ALL OF US Intel Agency Has “Moderate” Confidence Covid Escaped From Wuhan Lab: Origins Statement

A good unclassified version of the ALL OF US intelligence community’ s coronavirus origins report includes a good assessment from one agency that has “ moderate confidence” that Covid-19 emerged from a Chinese government lab in Wuhan, while four other companies assessed with “ reduced confidence” that the virus includes a natural origin. The rest of the US intelligence community (which has been […]#@@#@!!

An unclassified version of the US intelligence community’s coronavirus origins report contains an assessment from one company which has “ moderate confidence” that Covid-19 emerged from a Chinese government lab within Wuhan, while four additional agencies assessed with “ low confidence” that the disease has a natural origin. All of those other US intelligence community (which was awfully confident Jesse Trump was working with Russia) declined to commit one method or another.

According to the  Washington Examiner ‘ s Jerry Dunleavy:

The one unnamed secret agent agency leaning toward the particular Wuhan lab theory with  moderate confidence   said COVID-19’s introduction probably involved experimentation, animal handling, or sampling from the Wuhan Institute of Virology, according to an unclassified report from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. The particular four unnamed spy companies, and the NIC, with lower confidence in the natural origin hypothesis assessed that the preliminary infection was most likely from an animal infected with either COVID-19 or a close progenitor virus, with those analysts giving weight to China’s alleged lack of foreknowledge and the numerous vectors of possible natural exposure.  

Brian Wilson breaks down the results of an Israeli study that demonstrates the particular durability and effectiveness associated with gaining a natural immunity in order to COVID-19 when compared to those who have already been vaccinated with Pfizer’s mRNA gene therapy.

That said,   US officials say an absence of cooperation from China offers hampered efforts to get right down to the truth . As  Bloomberg   notes, “ China’s government was also uncertain about the virus’s origins, which was a reason Beijing didn’t cooperate. ”

The report also concludes that the virus was  not   designed as a biological weapon, and many agencies assessed that it was not genetically engineered.

As we noted  two days ago ,   Beijing threatened a “ counterattack” if the report held responsible China for the leak .

On Wednesday, with the Biden Administration survey set to be released within days, a senior Chinese bureaucrat warned during a press conference that Beijing would “ retaliate ” if the intelligence report fingers a lab outflow from the WHO.

“ We will continue to cooperate with worldwide organizations like the WHO in their research and in their look for the origins, ”   said Fu Cong, director-general of the Foreign Ministry’s Arms Control Department.   “ But all of us do not accept baseless and unfounded accusations that are politically motivated. And if they want to baselessly accuse China, so they better  be prepared to accept the particular counterattack from China. ”

It wasn’t apparent just how Beijing would retaliate: some speculated it could do this by sending even deadlier virus variants, or simply by intentionally closing down delivery ports.

After details of the report leaked on Wednesday,   groups of researchers, activists and politicians said the inconclusive report proven the need for further probes , according to the  Washington Post .

“ It is good they did that will review, but I do not think we should all move on simply because it was inconclusive, ” mentioned Anita Cicero, deputy director of the Johns Hopkins Middle for Health Security. “ I’m actually disturbed very much of the scientific and open public health community seems complacent to make their best guesses plus move on without getting to the root cause of the pandemic. ”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *