Powerful: Michigan Doctor Slams Labor force Vaccine Mandates

PhD in cellular and molecular biology breaks down faulty science behind experimental mRNA jabs.

The Michigan doctor gave full-throated support for HB 4471 , a bill which would prohibit businesses in the state from requiring shots as a condition of employment.

Testifying before the Michigan House last week, Dr . Christina Parks shipped powerful expert analysis explaining it’s unethical for the federal government to mandate vaccines which usually, not only don’t prevent transmission, but actually appear to be deterioration the human immune system.

“ … This is incredibly complex science that has been oversimplified in the media to fundamentally take away our freedom of choice, ” Dr . Parks says.

Dr . Parks breaks down how the shot isn’t going to attenuate symptoms related to the particular Covid Delta variant, and says the “ CDC is blaming anti-vaxxers for your limitations of this vaccine design. ”

“ I suggest that they be clear and tell parents that will, although it is preventing severe disease in their children, it is not preventing transmission because we have created a whole class of asymptomatic pertussis carriers who are increasing the disease, ” Doctor Parks says.

She goes on to explain that will PHds are among the most extremely skeptical of the vaccine, in addition to African Americans who have an unvaccinated rate of seventy percent.

“ Why? Because they don’t trust their government. Do they have reason not to trust their government? ” Parks requests rhetorically, before building the girl case.

“ Well, between the years of 1930 in 1970 the CDC conducted the Tuskegee test where they took untreated males with syphilis and they refused to treat them. Even after antibiotics became available, they nevertheless did not treat them and they also did not tell them that they had syphilis. They told those people that they were there to secure their health and they did not protected their health. They abused them. You say, ‘ Well that was in the past, ‘ although I don’t think 1970 was that long ago. ”

Dr . Parks concludes her remarks by evaluating the discrimination faced by unvaccinated people in the workforce to the racial segregation of olden days.

“ … You’re telling me that my boy will not be able to be educated in the event that, based on the history of African Americans in this country, that he is not going to want to be vaccinated? ”

“ So I will certainly leave you with that question: that are we going to exclude from the workforce? Are we going to continue with discrimination and segregation in the United States of America? ”

Read through a transcript of Dr . Parks’ comments below:

Hello. My name is Dr . Christina Parks,

I received my PhD in cellular and molecular biology right here in the state of Michigan from University or college of Michigan Medical College, and so I’m very well qualified in the science of both these mRNA gene therapy vaccines, this kind of technology, as well as what a vaccine is designed to do in your body, what it can do, what it cannot do, and the fact that this is extremely complex science which has been oversimplified in the media in order to basically take away our freedom of choice.

What I want to tackle today in this limited period is the fact that vaccine requirements plus mandates are based on the defective assumption that the vaccines under consideration prevent transmission of the pathogen. Right? Does the vaccine for DTAP prevent transmitting? No . Does the vaccine for flu prevent transmission? No . Do the vaccines meant for covid prevent transmission? Number In fact , they were never designed to do that.

All right, so occur to be asking, ‘ What about this 95 effectiveness? ‘ If you look at those clinical trials, they do not say that they avoid transmission; they expressly declare they’re measuring whether they attenuate symptoms. So they’re 95 percent effective based on their particular clinical trials at attenuating symptoms for the first version, which is essentially gone within our population.

Right? Now the predominant variant is the Delta and CDC Director Walensky basically said that these vaccines have no ability to prevent irritation by and transmission of the Delta variant.

So the policy needs not to be built on the hope associated with what we think something we want it to do, but the actual data actually tell us. So do these… vaccines prevent the virus from infecting and replicating in the nose and nasopharynx? No . They’ve only been shown to prevent that replication in the lungs. They’re different — the mucosa is very different than the lungs. It’s very different than the blood. You provide it to the blood, you make antibodies in your blood. The virus isn’t infecting your own blood, it’s infecting your mucosa and you don’t create any IGA to reduce the effects of it.

In fact , recent studies have shown that the vaccinated, especially with the Delta variant, and the unvaccinated have similar levels of virus in their nose and throat.

In Barnstable, Massachusetts, the CDC tracked a good outbreak of 469 situations of Covid, 74 percent occurred in fully-vaccinated plus 4 out of five of those hospitalized were vaccinated.

Correct, so maybe they are mandating this because they just failed to know with the Covid… and so my main complaint is by using our health agencies and the CDC who basically know better and are misleading the public.

So , let’s look at DTAP which the scientists in the CDC have known since 2014 that the acellular pertussis vaccine will not prevent people from obtaining infected with the pertussis bacterias and passing it to others.

In fact , it was never designed to do that. The vaccine was created to neutralize the pertussis toxin. Pertussis, we know this as whooping cough; it could be fatal for children under six months, so neutralizing this toxin saves lives. Very well?

I’m not going to debate that will, but what it doesn’t do is neutralize the bacterias. So what happens is fully-vaccinated children go to daycare, they pick up that bacteria, and so they come home, and they give it to their newborn brother, or sister, they get deathly ill and they go to the hospital. Ideally our medical professionals are able to save them, but who perform they blame? Now the particular CDC is blaming anti-vaxxers for the limitations of this shot design.

I suggest that they end up being transparent and tell mothers and fathers that, although it is stopping severe disease in their children, it is not preventing transmission mainly because we have created a whole course of asymptomatic pertussis carriers who are increasing the disease.

Today, the old DTP vaccine that many of you who are the age or older got, did prevent transmission. Whenever we switched to the safer acellular version they knew that it was never designed to prevent transmitting. It was safer, it got less adverse advance, yet pertussis cases have gone through the roof. There’s a resurgence in pertussis because of the design of the vaccine and the vaccinologists understand this. They’re trying to deal with it, and so we can not mandate that something that does not prevent transmission.

What about the particular flu vaccine? Well, they have shown that basically body fat difference, there’s no statistical difference if you’re vaccinated, or unvaccinated whether you get the flu or not — but is actually even worse, because although that first year it is fairly effective, it’s about sixty-five percent effective at preventing signs and symptoms in you, after that it in fact has negative efficacy, and I want to address this since it’s very important.

Vaccines are made to a specific variant and when that will variant mutates the shot no longer recognizes it, therefore it’s like you’re viewing a completely new virus, and because that’s so you actually get more severe symptoms when you’re vaccinated against one variant and then it mutates and then your entire body sees the other variant; therefore there’s the potential, and the technology shows, that in fact using the flu, if you get vaccinated in multiple years you are more likely to get severe illness, you are more likely to have more viral replication, and you are more likely to be hospitalized, both in adults and in children.

We are seeing the same thing in Covid with the Delta variant, and so we are mandating that people get a vaccine which could actually make them more sick and tired when they’re exposed to herpes.

In fact , this week a papers came out and what it demonstrated is that with this Delta variant when you’re vaccinated your body can make antibodies that are supposed to neutralize the virus, but they were meant to neutralize the old variant. Whenever they see this new version what they’re doing is certainly they’re actually… the antibodies are taking the virus and helping it infect the cells. Alright?

That science was just published this week. We need to be looking at the science, and we need our policy to reveal the science, and we likewise require it to reflect our own rights.

And so, as a PHd who knows the science, Now i am in the category of the most shot hesitant group.

Yes, PHd’s are the most vaccine cautious, followed by people who have less than a senior high school degree because they know what imply know and they don’t trust their government and many people, the other group that is extremely vaccine hesitant are African-Americans. 70 percent of African Americans have not taken this particular vaccine. Why? Because they have a tendency trust their government.

Do they have reason not to believe in their government?

Well, between years of 1930 in 1970 the CDC conducted the particular Tuskegee experiment where they took untreated males along with syphilis and they refused to deal with them. Even after antibiotics came out, they still did not deal with them and they did not inform them that they had syphilis. They told those people that they were there to secure their health and they will did not secure their health. They abused them. A person say, ‘ Well that was in the past, ‘ although I actually don’t think 1970 was that long ago.

While in 2012, whistleblower Bill Thompson came forward and said we published research that said MMR does not result in autism, but we lied.

In fact , we shredded information that showed that when black boys are vaccinated on time they have increased rates of autism diagnosis, and we disposed it and we left this out of the paper.

As an African-American and a PHd, I want to request each of you: are we going to exclude 70 percent of African-American people from the workforce and from education? Our ancestors did not work this particular hard — I show up from a family that worked very hard and I’m very aware that my privileges are dependent on the work of my grandmother and the great-grandmother and I have excellent respect for these people that place me where I am, however you’re telling me that will my son will not be able to be educated if, based on the great African Americans in this country, that he doesn’t want to be vaccinated?

So I will leave you with that question: who are we likely to exclude from the workforce? Are we going to continue along with discrimination and segregation in the United States of America?

Thank you.


CHINA ATTACKED THE UNITED STATES: Top Chinese Whistleblower Unearths COVID-19 As An Unrestricted Warfare Bioweapon


BREAKING: Top Scientists/Doctors Confirm COVID Vaxx Causing Brain Damage and Bloodstream Clots

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *