There is a fundamental question that needs to be questioned when examining the vaccine passport issue, and what I actually find is that almost no 1 in the mainstream is tackling it directly.
The question is this particular:
Could it be legally and morally acceptable to constrict the legal rights and economic access of individuals in order to force them to send to an experimental “ vaccine”, or any other medical procedure for instance?
Moreover, who gets to decide what medical procedures are acceptable to enforce? Who gets to be the all powerful and good-hearted overseer of every human being’s health path. I find out because I don’t think many people realize the future repercussions of allowing governments or companies (the same thing these days) to dictate covid vaccinations. It doesn’t stop there; actually we have no idea where this particular stops once the Pandora’s container is opened.
For example , the primary argument from the covid cult and the business in favor of vaccine passports may be the “ social contract” fable. They claim that because we “ live in a society”, everything we do impacts everyone else in some way, and because all of us are interconnected in our “ collective” we are thus beholden to the collective. In other words, the collective has the “ right” to micro-manage the life of the individual because if the individual is allowed to make his/her own decisions they might potentially cause harm to the whole group.
In case you are not familiar with this philosophy it is action of socialism and social Marxism, and it stands in the very core of shot passport propaganda. I have actually had public debates with pro-socialist people in the past who have tried to defend the worth of socialism and every individual time the argument comes down to one singular disconnect – I say that if a group want to go off and start their own little socialist community they have every right to… provided that it is VOLUNTARY. Then if it fails and collapses it because it doesn’t affect me personally or anyone else who failed to want to participate.
The problem is that these Socialists/communists/Marxists/collectivists just do not grasp the notion associated with voluntarism. They believe that people need to be forced into doing the right thing or helping others, and they are the people that will get to decide what the right thing is and which gets the help. They are the people that get to decide what freedoms are acceptable and what freedoms are inconvenient to their agenda. When they say “ We all live in a society… ”, what they really mean can be “ You live in OUR culture, and WE will determine what is best for a person. ”
After i argue that a socialist community should be voluntary, they certainly argue that people will not commit to such a system voluntarily so that they must be forced to do what exactly is best for the “ better good”.
With regards to vaccine passports, the collectivist social contract is a key factor. They claim that being unvaxxed is not a personal freedom since the unvaxxed are a risk towards the lives of everyone else. The particular social contract is as a result violated because by making a private life choice you are endangering the rights of others.
It’s interesting though how the covid cult consists of people that do not apply the same logic to other health issues such as abortion. I mean, there is absolutely no substantiated evidence to support what he claims that unvaccinated people are anymore of a threat to the lifestyles of others than vaccinated individuals are, and we will get into that in only a moment. But , when we talk about an abortion, we are referring to a personal medical decision leading to the direct and visible death of another blameless human being with his/her own rights. Abortions end the lives of over eight hundred, 000 unborn people per year in the US, far more than covid supposedly does.
“ My body my choice” apparently only applies to killing babies, but not to people which do not want to become guinea pigs for a mRNA cocktail with no long term testing to prove its safety.
Imagine though if we reversed the scenario plus applied the broad interpersonal contract argument to something like children and population? The collectivist/leftist member of the global heating cult could also argue that child killingilligal baby killing should be legally mandated, due to the fact having a child or “ too many children” increases co2 emissions and this puts society “ at risk” even more (again, with no proof to support the claim). By permitting the social contract narrative to go unchecked, we open the door to horrific brand new oppressive measures and a total erasure of our autonomy.
I think it’s secure to say that the “ interpersonal contract” ideology is highly selective and hypocritical. The covid cult does not care about saving lives, they only value their ideological narrative and the power to make people post to it. But let’s get even further into the reasoning at the rear of the social contract declare. Who is actually dying due to unvaccinated individuals, which according to state vax statistics make up around 50 percent of the US population ?
The average Infection Fatality Rate (IFR) associated with covid is a mere 0. 26% according to dozens of studies and the government’s own figures. Meaning, unvaxxed people are not really a remote threat to 99. 7% of the population. Around 40% of all covid deaths are made up of people in nursing homes with preexisting conditions, which means that all of us do not know if they actually died of covid or because of the health problems they were already suffering from. The pool of people that might be affected by the unvaxxed grows smaller and smaller…
And what regarding the ridiculous contradiction that occurs when we talk about the require narrative verses the passport narrative? If masks plus vaccines actually work, then how is an unvaxxed or even unmasked person a risk to a vaxxed person? When the vaccines and masks avoid work, then why use them at all, and why need forced vaccinations through passport measures?
Popular propaganda asserts that the unvaxxed will somehow become petri dishes for new mutations which will harm vaccinated people. There is absolutely no evidence to support this declare. In fact , there is more evidence that suggests it is vaccinated people that will trigger mutations and variants. The press says that this is not trigger for any concern, but if decades then neither should all of us be concerned about mutations that gestate in the unvaxxed population, when there are any.
The fact of the matter is the fact that more and more scientific evidence is definitely proving that the experimental vaccines are NOT effective and that the unvaxxed are actually safer from covid regardless of the variant or mutation.
The real infection numbers within the US are impossible to know because up to 59% of people that capture covid and spread it are asymptomatic according to the CDC. They never know that they have it so they are unlikely to try for it. That said, it is apparent that many millions of Americans have dealt with the virus and now possess a natural immunity to it (I happen to be one of them). Organization elitists like Anthony Fauci refuse to acknowledge natural immunity as a factor, and they declare ONLY people who are vaccinated are usually qualified to receive a passport. Why?
Several studies are being released from countries with high vaccination rates like Israel that completely contradict Fauci’s narrative on natural immunity. His home country of israel has a vax rate associated with around 63% according to authorities stats, but scientific evidence they have released shows that vaccinated people are 13-27 times very likely to contract covid and 8 times more likely to be hospitalized when compared with people who have natural immunity. It almost appears as though the mRNA vaccines make people MORE susceptible to the virus rather than less susceptible.
Recent data launched from the state of Massachusetts supports this concern. In the month of July, MA reported at least 5100 covid infections, all people who were fully vaccinated . Over 80 of them died, which is a much higher death price than among the unvaccinated. In my county of 20, 500 people, which has a low vaccination rate and no mask mandates, there were only 17 overall covid deaths in the very first year year of the outbreak.
This begs the question: Why take the mRNA cocktail at all? What is generally there to gain? Well, there is nothing to get in terms of health safety. Even though you happen to be part of the 0. 26% of people at risk from covid, you are better off in the long run obtaining your chances with natural immunity than getting the jab.
The answer to the question is not about health, yet about denial of entry. Government’s and their corporate partners are trying to make it therefore you MUST take the vaccine in order to participate in normal social routines, or even to keep a job. Not just that, but the process goes on permanently because every year there will be new variants and new booster shots. The only reason to take the vaccine is to keep at least a handful of your freedoms and to avoid poverty plus starvation.
The following is where we must go back to the initial query presented at the beginning of this article:
Is certainly this legally and morally acceptable to constrict the rights and economic access of people in order to force them to distribute to an experimental “ vaccine”?
The particular covid cult will declare private business rights trump individual rights so businesses should be allowed to discriminate towards employees based on their vaccination status. But then again, what we are facing in most cases are NOT personal businesses but conglomerates that are funded by government bailouts and that are colluding leading with governments to impose the passport agenda. And so i would have to say no, these businesses do not have a legal right to prey on public tax dollars and after that claim they are private entities that have the freedom in order to invade the medical personal privacy of employees and clients.
And since when do collectivists actually worry about private business rights, anyhow? More hypocrisy…
If we are talking about little and medium business without government stimulus then the issue gets more tricky. In many states and other countries the businesses are only enforcing passports if they don’t they will be punished from the government. In this case the personal business rights argument is out the window. The covid cult respects business independence only when it suits all of them.
Frankly, it really is small businesses that are being hurt probably the most by the covid mandates and the extra costs involved simply in enforcing the given in their own establishments will probably bury them. Any small company owner that voluntarily supports the particular passport rules must have economic death wish.
In terms of government, the covid cult will claim that there are Supreme Court precedents to get legal enforcement of vaccines. Honestly, I don’t treatment, and neither do numerous other Americans. A bunch of high priests in black attire do not get to dictate the independent health decisions; We make those decisions and there’s nothing that they can do about this. This is where we have to come to terms with the particular morals and principles involved – The lives more are in no way affected by my decision to refuse to adhere to vaccine passports. And just just because a group of people have irrational worries about the threat of covid does not mean people with more discernment about the facts should be necessary to make them “ feel better” or feel safer.
The bottom line is this: Our freedoms are more important compared to your paranoid fears, and we’ll not comply. We do not subscribe to your false social contract, and you are in simply no position to dictate the terms of our “ society”. Don’t like it? You are more than welcome to leave the country and begin a vaccinated Utopia somewhere else. We’ll see how that works out for you in the long run.
Greg Reese reports about how the QR Code will be used to indicate every human being on Earth!