After major backlash at the possibility of big brother-esque monitoring of everything you do – ironically juxtaposed against an entire advertising technique of ‘ privacy’ – Apple has, for now, deserted its plans to install Child Sex Abuse Material (CSAM) tools.
Tech experts had cautioned the Apple’s targeting of handsets and iPads, as opposed to images already stored in the iCloud, created the blueprint for a ‘ back door’ surveillance system that would bypass end-to-end encryption undermine user privacy.
In a statement, the giant tech company said this is taking “ more hours over the coming months to collect input and make improvements before releasing these critically important child safety features. ”
“ Last month we introduced plans for features intended to help protect children through predators who use communication tools to recruit and exploit them, and restrict the spread of Child Sexual Abuse Material, ” Apple said in a statement.
“ Based on feedback from customers, advocacy groups, researchers and others, we have decided to take additional time within the coming months to collect insight and make improvements just before releasing these critically essential child safety features. ”
As the old saying goes: If you not necessarily doing anything illegal, then you have nothing to fear from surveillance.
So why would Apple abandon this plan? It appears the company’s privacy brand name is worth more than virtue-signaling in regards to a tool to catch child abuse predators (or people taking photos of the Capitol? ).
Many warned when Apple very first announced this plan that the strategy is only a few steps removed from ‘ 1984′-style surveillance. Alec Muffett, a security researcher and personal privacy campaigner who formerly proved helpful at Facebook and Deliveroo, said Apple’s move had been “ tectonic” and a “ huge and regressive step for individual privacy. Apple company are walking back personal privacy to enable 1984. ”