BREAKING: 92 State Legislators Indication Letter Demanding 50-State Selection Audit, Decertification
“We call on each state in order to decertify its electors exactly where it has been shown the elections were certified prematurely and inaccurately. “
92 state legislators from all across America have issued a requirement letter calling for a 50 state-wide 2020 election audit and decertification following the explosive Arizona audit that revealed how “ our representative republic suffered a damaged 2020 election. ”
After the comprehensive Az audit of Maricopa County was completed, Arizona Senator Wendy Rogers unveiled what she called the “ new Declaration of Independence” by which 41 state legislators throughout America called for a 50-state wide 2020 election audit, and should those audits recommend a flawed election, bulk decertification of the original 2020 election results, National File previously reported .
“ This is our new Declaration of Independence. This is our manifesto of freedom, ” Rogers announced.
This comes after the forensic audit associated with Arizona’s Maricopa County uncovered thousands of discrepancies and issues with EV32 and EV33 ballot forms, along with a number of other serious election integrity problems, as National File reported .
Today, the number of condition legislators that have signed onto the letter has more than doubled – with 92 signatories joining in calls for political election integrity.
Since National File Senior Media reporter Patrick Howley documented on September 28, the number of voters within the 2020 Presidential election within Maricopa County, Arizona “ with no record” of their living far outnumbers the perimeter of “ victory” that Joe Biden supposedly achieved last year, thus putting immense pressure on Arizona United states senate President Karen Fann to do this and move to decertify the final results of the 2020 election, because the true results of the 2020 political contest appear to be unidentified.
“ All voters within the Last Voted File, or VM55, was cross-checked against a commercially available data source given by Melissa called Personator and 86, 391 individuals had been found with no record within the database for either their name, or anyone with exactly the same last name at the address in the VM55 file, ” according to page 56 of the survey entitled “ Maricopa County Forensic Election Review: Volume III: Result Information. ”
However , constitutional professionals across America have pointed out that decertification would be audio legal recourse for a corrupted election after-the-fact.
“ We are in uncharted territory, but there are a handful of things to point to, ” began Eastman. “ We can point out the Hawaii Election of 1960, when the Governor subsequently certified another slate associated with electors after they discovered error in the initial certification. ”
“ We can point to Section 2 associated with Title 3 of the United States Code that says when a condition has had an election, and it has failed to make a choice on the day recommended by law, which is, you know, the choice that was made. The presumption was that it was fraudulently provided because of illegal votes. The electors may be appointed on the subsequent day in such manner as the legislature of this kind of state may direct, ” Eastman continued. “ To ensure that recognizes the authority from the Legislature to fix a problem. ”
“ We all also have a backdrop of Common Law, which is, if you have a fraud, the actions taken pursuant to the fraud, are unraveled after discovery of the fraud. If the evidence does indeed come in as definitive, which the election and the electorals throw from Arizona were fraudulently given, and they should have been given in the other direction, i quickly think there is ample specialist to fix this problem, ” Eastman said. “ We don’t have to live with a fraudulent political election. ”
The first demand letter to Maricopa County was sent from your Arizona Attorney General’s workplace asking for multiple documents associated with the election, in what appears to be the start of the investigation from the recently created Elections Honesty Unit following the Arizona review report being released to the Arizona Senate, National File reported . The evidence included in the AG office’s request includes:
- Hard copies of all documents and other electronically stored details.
- Electronic communications, including emails and the gadgets used for messaging.
- Electronic data from computers, election systems, spreadsheets and databases, among others.
- Telephone logs and network access information.
- All the equipment used in the election, such as voting machines.
- All physical records, including ballots and voter registration forms.
- All video footage from Maricopa County’s election center.
- Access information for all buildings maintained from the county during the election.