Infants Riddled With Microplastics, Study Discovers
Shocking new research has shown that babies have up to 15 times more microplastics inside their bodies than adults
Shocking new studies have shown that babies have up to 15 times a lot more microplastic in their bodies than adults.
This worrying brand new evidence will only add to concerns that microplastic pollution has got totally out of hand and will have serious effects for years to come, even if we begin to introduce measures to control it right away.
In recent months, as part of our ongoing spotlight on the dangerous industrial and natural chemicals that are playing havoc with our health , we’ve discussed microplastics on a number of occasions.
Microplastics – tiny pieces of plastic that are either designed to be of that or become so through weathering – act as vectors for harmful xenoestrogens , as well as causing actual damage to organisms, especially organisms and juvenile organisms like baby fish.
The scale of the problem is already mind-boggling. Scientific models now suggest that microplastics are so ubiquitous that they are circulating like a ‘ force of nature’, reaching the most remote locations – even places people have never set foot before.
Experts at the New York University College of Medicine compared stool samples through newborns, infants and grown ups to ascertain concentrations of 2 different kinds of plastic in them. All of the subjects were from Nyc State.
The particular team were looking for two typical kinds of microplastic, polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and polycarbonate (PC).
First of all, they will noticed that all of the samples contained at least one of the two sorts of microplastic they were looking for. This particular shouldn’t be surprising, given what we already known about the ubiquity of these substances.
The real shock came whenever they compared the baby samples to those of the adults. In the child samples, there were at least 10 times as much microplastic. Indeed, that’s right: TEN times.
So how could this particular be happening?
The researchers believe that the way babies are consuming this kind of high levels of microplastics is usually through chew-toys like idiot’s and from crawling close to on carpets that contain microplastics.
It’s really worth noting, too, that microplastics have already been found in the placentas of mothers , raising the prospect that some of the microplastics found in the babies in the sample could have been approved to them by their mothers.
Although scientists as soon as believed microplastics would just pass through the gastrointestinal tract without causing any damage, recent research suggests the smallest pieces are able to cross cell membranes and enter the circulation.
It is really an obvious cause for issue, and all the more so mainly because research on microplastics within lab animals has triggered cell death, inflammation and metabolic disorders.
Human research is also beginning to substantiate these potential causes harm to. A new study has shown, for example, that microplastics can alter the form of human lung cellular material and affect their working.
As being a press release for the research notes: “ After only a few days, the man of science began to observe some strange changes take pace, discovering that the plastic particles caused the particular cells’ metabolism to decrease and hampered their expansion and growth. ”
The microplastics did not kill the lung cellular material, but they did alter their particular function and integrity in ways that are seriously worrying and suggest that people with lung circumstances could be at elevated risk of harm from these microscopic pieces of plastic.
Microplastics and xenoestrogen pollution
It’s already well known, too, that microplastics are carriers of toxic xenoestrogens, commercial chemicals that have disastrous gender-bending effects. These chemicals are believed to be one of the principal factors behind a calamitous decline within fertility that could bring about the conclusion of human reproduction as we know it.
By 2045, according to Professor Shanna Swan, the majority of men might no longer be able to reproduce because of the effects of harmful chemicals from a variety of common household sources.
“ We’re about 40 years behind global warming, in terms of awareness, ” she says – yet the threat to human survival is just as great as, if not greater than, our concerns about greenhouse gas emissions.
According to Swan’s projections from the available data, by 2045 the sperm count of the median man will reach zero – meaning that one half of all men will have no sperm at all, and the other half will have a sum that is barely more than zero. Functionally, all men will soon be infertile.
The implications should be obvious: no sperm, no babies. This type of scenario has already been dubbed ‘ Spermageddon’ .
But it’s not just xenoestrogens that are responsible for the precipitous decline in male fertility we’re witnessing. Swan also points to a variety of other factors that seem to be at the job, including the use of contraceptives, obesity, smoking and ‘ cultural shifts’, a rather vague term which would have deserved further explanation.
Can it be that as men behave – or are given less room to behave – in less stereotypically manly ways, they may actually become so? There may be other biological factors at work too, she suggests, pointing to the collapse in testosterone levels in western men over the last half century.
While a reduction in testosterone levels is a fact of life for all men while they age – after the age of 30, a man can expect to lose 1% of his natural testosterone every year for the rest of his life – this natural reduction pales in comparison with the society-wide collapse in T levels that has occurred on the second half of the twentieth and the first quarter of the twenty-first century.
Men today have considerably less T than men of the same age even a single generation ago. A 2007 study in the Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism showed an important reduction in the T degrees of men since the 1980s. A 60-year-old American man in 2004, for example , had 17% less testosterone than a 60-year-old American man in 1987.
While the collapse of testosterone is likely to be from the ubiquity of the xenoestrogenic chemicals Swan warns about, sedentary lifestyles and the consumption of phytoestrogens are also likely to be playing a large role.
All in all, it adds up to a witch’s brew of environmental, social and biological factors that are making it ever harder for men to maintain their masculinity and fulfil their biological purpose.
And this new evidence, that babies appear to be suffering disproportionately at a time when their developing bodies are most susceptible, should only steel us to tackle this problem at once. Only time will tell if we have the good sense, and the courage, to do this.
Mike Adams joins Alex Jones to expose the collapse of society taking place as supply chains are disrupted and how that fits squarely into the globalist agenda to swoop in and take control.
