The authorities State’s Reign of Fear Continues – With Assist From the Supreme Court

Along with each passing day, it becomes significantly clear that Americans can no longer rely on the courts in order to “take the government off the shells of the people. “

“ Rights generally are not rights if someone may take them away. They’re liberties. ” — George Carlin

You think you’ve got legal rights? Think again.

All of those freedoms we cherish— the ones enshrined in the Cosmetic, the ones that affirm our directly to free speech and set up, due process, privacy, bodily integrity, the right to not have got police seize our property or home without a warrant, or lookup and detain us without probable cause— amount to absolutely nothing when the government and its providers are allowed to disregard those people prohibitions on government overreach at will.

This is actually the grim reality of life in the American police state.

In fact , in the face of the government’s ongoing strength grabs, our so-called rights have been reduced to simple technicalities, privileges that can be granted and taken away, all using the general blessing of the legal courts.

This is what you might call a slow loss of life by a thousand cuts, only it’s the Constitution being inexorably bled to death by very institution (the judicial branch of government) which is supposed to be protecting it (and us) from government mistreatment.

Court pundits,   fixated on a handful of politically charged cases   before the U. S. Supreme Court this term dealing with abortion, gun rights and COVID-19 mandates, have failed to recognize that the Supreme Court— and the courts in general— sold all of us out long ago.

With each passing day, it becomes increasingly clear that Us citizens can no longer rely on the legal courts to “ take the government off the backs of the people, ” in the words associated with Supreme Court Justice Bill O. Douglas. When given an opportunity to loosen the government’s noose that keeps obtaining cinched tighter and stronger around the necks of the American people, what does our present Supreme Court usually perform?

It ducks. Prevaricates. Remains  noiseless . Speaks to the narrowest possible concern.

More often than not, it gives the government as well as its corporate sponsors the benefit of the doubt, seemingly more focused on establishing order and protecting government interests than with upholding the rights of the people enshrined in the U. S. Constitution.

Rarely do the concerns from the populace prevail.

Every so often, the justices toss a bone to those whom fear they have abdicated their particular allegiance to the Constitution. Many times, however , the Supreme Court tends to march in lockstep with the police state.

As a result, the police along with other government agents have been generally empowered to probe, stick, pinch, taser, search, seize, strip and generally manhandle anyone they see slot in almost any circumstance.

In  recent years , for example , the Court has ruled that police officers can use lethal force in car chases without fear of lawsuits; police officers can stop cars dependent only on “ anonymous” tips; Secret Service providers are not accountable for their activities, as long as they’re done in the “ security”; citizens just have a right to remain silent if they assert it; police possess free reign to use drug-sniffing dogs as “ research warrants on leashes, ” justifying any and all police queries of vehicles stopped over the roadside; police can intentionally take your DNA, whether or not might been convicted of a criminal offense; police can stop, search, question and profile citizens and non-citizens alike; police may subject Americans to digital strip searches, no matter the “ offense”; police may break into homes without a bring about, even if it’s the wrong house; and it’s a crime to not identify yourself when a policeman asks your name.

Moreover, it was a  unanimous   Supreme Court which determined that police officers might use drug-sniffing dogs to perform warrantless searches of cars   during schedule traffic stops. That same Court gave police the particular green light to taser defenseless motorists, strip search non-violent suspects arrested for minor incidents, and break down people’s front doors without proof that they have done anything wrong.

The situations the Supreme Court  refuses to hear , permitting lower court judgments to stand, are almost because critical as the ones these people rule on. Some of these cases have delivered devastating blows to the rights enshrined within the Constitution.

By remaining silent, the Court has affirmed that: lawfully owning a firearm is enough in order to justify a no-knock raid by police; the army can arrest and detain American citizens; students can be put through random lockdowns and mass searches at school; police officers who don’t know their activities violate the law aren’t guilty of breaking the law;   problems understanding police orders constitutes resistance   that will justifies the use of excessive drive; and the areas immediately adjacent to one’s apartment can be  subjected to warrantless law enforcement surveillance   and arrests.

Create no mistake about it: whenever such instances of abuse are usually continually validated by a judicial system that kowtows to every police demand, no matter how unjust, no matter how in opposition to the Metabolic rate, one can only conclude the system is rigged.

By  refusing to simply accept any of the eight or so certified immunity cases before this last   12 months that strove to hold law enforcement accountable for official misconduct, the particular Supreme Court delivered the chilling reminder that within the American police state, “ we the people” are in the mercy of law enforcement officers who have almost absolute discretion to decide who is a threat, what constitutes level of resistance, and how harshly they can cope with the citizens they were designated to ‘ serve and protect. ”

This is how qualified immunity helps to keep the police state in energy.

Lawyers tend to offer a lot of complicated, convoluted explanations for the doctrine of qualified immunity, which was  intended to insulate government officials from frivolous legal cases , but the real reason for qualified immunity is to rig the system, ensuring that abusive brokers of the government almost always earn and the victims of authorities abuse almost always lose.

How else would you explain a doctrine that requires victims of police assault to prove that their own abusers knew their behaviour was illegal because it had been deemed so in a almost identical case at some before time?

May setup for failure.

A review of critical court rulings over the past several years, including rulings affirming qualified immunity protections for authorities agents by the U. H. Supreme Court, reveals a startling and steady pattern towards pro-police state rulings by an institution worried more with establishing purchase, protecting the ruling course, and insulating government agencies from charges of wrongdoing than with upholding the particular rights enshrined in the Constitution.

Indeed, because Reuters reports, qualified defenses “ has become a  nearly failsafe tool in order to let police brutality proceed unpunished   and deny victims their constitutional rights. ”

Worse, as Reuters came to the conclusion, “ the Supreme Court has built qualified immunity straight into an often insurmountable law enforcement defense by intervening within cases  mostly in order to favor the police . ”

For those looking for a reminder of all the ways in which the Supreme Court has made us sitting ducks at the mercy of the American police condition, let me offer the following.

As a result of court rulings in recent years, police can claim  qualified immunity meant for warrantless searches . Law enforcement can claim  certified immunity for warrantless busts   based on simple suspicion. Police can claim  qualified immunity to get using excessive force towards protesters . Police may claim  qualified defenses for shooting a running suspect in the back . Police can claim  qualified immunity for capturing a mentally impaired individual . Police officers can  use lethal force within car chases   without fear of lawsuits. Police can  stop, detain and search citizens with no reasonable suspicion   or probable cause.   Police officers can  prevent cars based on “ anonymous” tips   or for “ suspicious” actions such as having a reclined car seat or driving too meticulously. Police  can forcibly take your DNA , whether or not you’ve been convicted of a crime.   Police  can use the “ anxiety for my life” explanation as an excuse for capturing unarmed individuals . Police have  free rule to use drug-sniffing dogs since “ search warrants on leashes. ”   Not only are police generally protected by qualified immunity, but  police canines are also off the hook designed for wrongdoing .

Police can  subject Americans to strip searches, no matter the “ offense. ”   Police  can break into houses without a warrant, even if it is the wrong home . Law enforcement can  use knock-and-talk tactics as a means of sidestepping the Fourth Amendment . Police can  carry out no-knock raids if they believe announcing themselves would be dangerous . Police can  recklessly open fire on anyone who might be “ armed. ”   Police can  destroy a home during a SWAT raid , even if the owner gives their consent to enter and lookup it. Police can  suffocate someone, deliberately or even inadvertently, in the process of subduing them .

To sum it up, we are dealing with the nationwide epidemic of court-sanctioned police violence carried out along with impunity against individuals appearing little or no real threat.

So where does that leave us?

For those deluded enough to believe that they are living the American dream— where the government represents individuals, where the people are equal in the eyes of the law, where the courts are arbiters associated with justice, where the police are usually keepers of the peace, plus where the law is applied equally as a means of protecting the rights of the people— it’s time to wake up.

We no longer possess a representative government, a principle of law, or proper rights.

Liberty has fallen to legalism. Freedom has fallen to fascism.

Justice is becoming jaded, jaundiced and just basic unjust.

As well as for too many, as I make clear inside my book  Battleground America: The War around the American People   and in its imaginary counterpart  The Erik Blair Diaries , the American imagine freedom and justice for everyone has turned into a living nightmare.

Given the turbulence of our age, with its govt overreach, military training drills on American soil, domestic surveillance, SWAT team raids, asset forfeiture, wrongful convictions, profit-driven prisons, corporate corruption, COVID mandates, and community-wide lockdowns, the need for a guardian of the people’s rights has never been greater.

Mike Adams Joins Alex Jones to expose the collapse of society taking place as provide chains are disrupted.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *