Mercola: Are the COVID Shots Operating?

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

A current report details a SARS-CoV-2 Delta outbreak in an Israeli hospital where 238 from 248 (96%) of the exposed patients and staff have been fully vaccinated with Pfizer’s mRNA vaccine

Of the 238 fully vaccinated individuals, 39 (16%) were infected, as were 3 of the 10 unvaccinated individuals who got exposed

While all of the sickened staff members recovered, five infected patients died and nine changed into severe or critical cases. All of the dead and severe/critical cases were fully vaccinated. Two unvaccinated patients that got infected only experienced mild illness

This outbreak tells us that this COVID shots cannot develop herd immunity. It also suggests vaccinated people may be a lot more prone to serious and deadly infection than the unvaccinated

Of 41, 552 hospitalized patients in the Oughout. S., 73% of the unvaccinated, 71% of the partially vaccinated and 72% of the fully vaccinated received a diagnosis associated with COVID-like illness (CLI) among January 1, 2021, and June 22, 2021

As we enter the 10th month associated with COVID injections, what can we tell about their usefulness? Are they working? According to data from Israel — which is the best in the world at this point, thanks to the Israelis’ dedication to information collection and transparency — it seems the news is anything but great, and that is a profoundly serious understatement.

In an October 3, 2021, substack article, ¹ Alex Berenson dissects a recent Eurosurveillance report ² in regards to a SARS-CoV-2 Delta outbreak within an Israeli dialysis ward. Eurosurveillance is a journal published by European Centers for Condition Control.

Hospital Outbreak Reveals the Ineffectiveness of COVID Jabs

An unidentified dialysis patient came in for scheduled treatment with fever and cough. Over the course of several days, his condition continued in order to deteriorate, but he continued to be in the dialysis unit at the Meir Medical Center.

COVID measures at the hospital includes routine wearing of full protective equipment simply by all COVID unit staff members, including N-95 mask, encounter shield, gown, gloves and hair cover. Patients also wear surgical masks whenever in the same room an additional patient.

By the time the sick patient was tested and diagnosed with COVID-19, he had a PCR period threshold (CT) of thirteen. 6, which means he had a viral load approximately one million times higher than a person with mild infection. This communication … challenges the particular assumption that high general vaccination rates will result in herd immunity and prevent COVID-19 outbreaks… In the outbreak explained here, 96. 2% of the exposed population was vaccinated. ~ Eurosurveillance October 3, 2021

The infection spread rapidly among patients and staff, spreading from your dialysis ward to the COVID-19 ward and other units. At the time of the outbreak, 238 from 248 (96%) of the exposed patients and staff had been fully vaccinated with Pfizer’s mRNA vaccine. Of the 238 fully vaccinated individuals, 39 (16%) were infected, since were three of the ten unvaccinated individuals who got exposed.

Near-Maximum Vaccination Rate Yet No Herd Immunity

While all of the sickened staff retrieved, five infected patients passed away and nine turned into severe or critical cases. All of the dead and severe/critical situations were fully vaccinated. 2 unvaccinated patients who were infected only had mild sickness. As noted by the writers: ³

“ The particular calculated attack rate among all exposed patients and staff was 10. 6% (16/151) for staff plus 23. 7% (23/97) pertaining to patients, in a population with 96. 2% vaccination price (238 vaccinated/248 exposed individuals).

Moreover, several transmissions most likely occurred between two people both wearing surgical masks, and in one instance making use of full PPE, including N-95 mask, face shield, gown and gloves …

This nosocomial outbreak exemplifies benefit transmissibility of the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant among twice vaccinated and masked individuals. This particular suggests some waning of immunity, albeit still offering protection for individuals without comorbidities …

This communication … challenges the assumption that will high universal vaccination rates will lead to herd defenses and prevent COVID-19 outbreaks…

Within the outbreak described here, 96. 2% of the exposed populace was vaccinated. Infection sophisticated rapidly (many cases grew to become symptomatic within 2 days of exposure), and viral fill was high.

Another accepted view is that, when facing a possible mismatch between the SARS-CoV-2 variant and vaccine or even waning immunity, the combination of vaccine and face mask should provide the necessary protection.

Even though some transmission between staff members could have occurred without masks, many transmissions between patients and staff occurred between masked and vaccinated individuals, because experienced in an outbreak through Finland. ”

This case tells us a couple of important things. First, that even in a population where more than 96% are fully vaccinated, outbreaks will occur. This means the shots are clearly not even remotely creating any kind of herd immunity. Indeed, there have been outbreaks even in populations where the vaccination rate had been 100%. ⁴

Secondly, the unvaccinated who got sick and tired had only mild sickness, while the fully vaccinated all ended up with severe infection. The particular unvaccinated recovered without a issue while several of the fully vaccinated patients died.

Thirdly, it lets us know masks, face shields plus gloves provide little more than the usual false sense of protection. Altogether, this report is definitely evidence that everything jooxie is currently doing is mischief.

COVID-Like Illness Among the Vaccinated

In the U. S., the information are far more manipulated, that next section will disclose. The study ⁵ in question, “ Usefulness of COVID-19 Vaccines in Ambulatory and Inpatient Care Settings, ” was released September 8, 2021, in The New England Journal associated with Medicine.

The particular researchers identified a total of 103, 199 hospitalizations among January 1, 2021, and June 22, 2021. Of those, 41, 552 met the research criteria for inclusion (the real number is actually 41, 159, as there’s a numerical error ⁶ ). Included patients had been 50 or older, together “ COVID-like illness” (CLI), defined as COVID symptoms and also a positive PCR test.

Excluded hospitalizations that will did not meet the study requirements were patients younger than 50, patients without vaccination record, repeat admissions, patients that had no COVID test results, and those which had received their 2nd dose of mRNA shot (or first and only dose required of the Janssen vaccine) within the last 14 days and therefore were not considered fully vaccinated.

The exclusion of people who got the jab within 14 days of their hospitalization is more than regrettable plus designed to create real misinformation and fraudulent results skewed in favor of the jab. Researchers have determined that you’re in increased risk of contamination during the first 14 days, because you haven’t reached adequate antibody levels yet.

A Swedish study ⁷ posted April 21, 2021, discovered “ The estimated shot effectiveness in preventing contamination ≥ 7 days after 2nd dose was 86% yet only 42% ≥ fourteen days after a single dose. ” While maximum effectiveness genuinely reached until the 14-day mark, why shouldn’t hospitalizations that will occur within that two-week window count?

According to The New England Diary of Medicine report, the potency of the mRNA shots against lab-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, 14 or more days after shot, was 89%, on average. Efficiency among those 85 and older, those with chronic medical conditions, and also Black and Hispanic adults, ranged from 81% to 95%.

The effectiveness of the particular Janssen “ vaccine” towards lab-confirmed infection leading to hospitalization was 68%, and 73% against infection requiring crisis care. That sounds pretty good, but it doesn’t tell the entire story.

Digging Further Into the Data

In a Twitter twine, ⁸ Ben M. double-checked plus recalculated the vaccine effectiveness, taking into account all CLI admissions, not just those where the affected person had been vaccinated at least 14 days prior. When adding those previously excluded patients back in, Ben M. came up with a vaccine effectiveness rate of 13%.

This individual also discovered that if you look at how many people actually had a CLI clinical diagnosis code among the 41, 552 incorporated patients, the rate of medical diagnosis between the unvaccinated, the partly vaccinated and the fully vaccinated was nearly identical: 73% for the unvaccinated, 71% for the partially vaccinated and 72% for the fully vaccinated.

Here’s where this gets interesting. When you look into the rate of CLI, and add in the rate of positive PCR tests, all of a sudden, distinctions between the groups become apparent. Only 2% of the completely vaccinated had a positive PCR test, compared to 6% of the partially vaccinated and 18% of the unvaccinated.

Ben M. speculates that vaccinated patients may be tested less routinely (12. 5% less frequently to be exact), or even unvaccinated patients are examined more routinely (11% more frequently than the vaccinated). But there might be another explanation. The Oughout. S. Centers for Condition Control and Prevention actually has two different sets of testing criteria, with respect to the patient’s vaccination status.

Fully vaccinated individuals suspected of having contracted COVID-19 are to be tested using a COMPUTERTOMOGRAFIE of 28 or much less, whereas unvaccinated patients are to be tested using a CT associated with 40.

Something over 35 CTs has been shown to produce 97% false advantages, ⁹ so this biased testing assistance virtually guarantees that vaccinated patients are more likely to test detrimental, while unvaccinated patients may get a false positive.

Partially Vaxxed Are the Most Symptomatic for CLI

What’s more, whenever Ben M. looked at symptoms alone, he found that this partially vaccinated are the the majority of symptomatic for CLI (29. 2%), followed by the fully vaccinated (28. 1%) after which the unvaccinated (27. 4%).

When he then recalculated vaccine effectiveness depending on symptomatic CLI alone (i. e., with or without a positive test), it again came out undesirable: -6% in the partially vaccinated and -3% in the completely vaccinated. As noted simply by Ben M. “ which means that despite COVID-19 vaccination, individuals appear to get as unwell and hospitalized (if not even more! ), as before?! ”

He or she provides a whole series of helpful visuals in his Twitter line, so to get a clearer idea, I recommend reading through it plus looking through all the charts provided. ¹⁰ In summary, what Ben M. discovered is that:

• The speed of CLI admission, diagnosis and symptoms are nearly identical between the unvaccinated plus vaccinated, so there’s no indicator that the COVID shot reduces CLI.

• Sample exclusions distort the data, making the COVID shots appear more effective.

• Of the included hospitalizations for CLI, 53% were either partly or fully vaccinated, compared to 47% unvaccinated.

As of June 15, 2021, 48. 7% of Americans were fully “ vaccinated, ” ¹¹ so the distribution of unvaccinated and fully vaccinated individuals being admitted to hospital should have been close to 50/50 by June 22, 2021, which was the cut-off date in this study.

The rate of partly vaccinated has trended regarding 8% to 10% higher, which would put the vaccinated in order to unvaccinated ratio at close to 60/40. If you assume the number of vaccinated people over the age of fifty was the same as the number of unvaccinated, or just slightly higher, the fact that 53% of CLI situations were vaccinated and 47% were unvaccinated, it indicates the rate of CLI is nearly identical regardless of vaccination position.

• To tease out exactly why vaccinated people develop CLI at the same rate as the unvaccinated, we need all-cause hospitalization and death data by vaccination status, but even though the CDC has acknowledged to Ben M. that they have this data, they denied his Independence of Information Act request to obtain it.

Simply no Correlation Between Vaccination Rates and COVID Cases

In related news, Blaze Media recently documented the findings of Harvard researchers, who found “ absolutely no correlation between vax rates and COVID situations globally. ” ¹² The paper’s title tells you pretty much shows the whole story and everything you need to know: “ Increases in COVID-19 Are Unrelated in order to Levels of Vaccination Across 68 Countries and 2, 947 Counties in the United States. ” ¹³ Based on the authors:

“ … the story related to the ongoing surge of new cases in the United States (US) is argued to be driven by areas with reduced vaccination rates. A similar story also has been observed in nations …

We used COVID-19 data provided by the The world in Data for cross-country analysis, available as of September 3, 2021 … We all included 68 countries that will met the following criteria: got second dose vaccine information available; had COVID-19 situation data available; had inhabitants data available; and the final update of data was within 3 days prior to or on September several, 2021.

For the 7 days preceding September 3, 2021 we all computed the COVID-19 cases per 1 million people for each country as well as the percentage of population that is completely vaccinated … The proportion increase in COVID-19 cases was calculated based on the difference in the event from the last 7 days and the 7 days preceding them …

At the country-level, there appears to be no discernable relationship between percentage of population fully vaccinated and new COVID-19 cases in the last 7 days. Actually the trend line suggests the marginally positive association so that countries with higher portion of population fully vaccinated have higher COVID-19 instances per 1 million people.

Notably, Israel with over 60% of their population fully vaccinated had the highest COVID-19 cases per 1 mil people in the last 7 days. Deficiency of a meaningful association in between percentage population fully vaccinated and new COVID-19 instances is further exemplified, for example, by comparison of Iceland plus Portugal.

Both countries have over 75% of their inhabitants fully vaccinated and have more COVID-19 cases per 1 million people than countries such as Vietnam and S. africa that have around 10% of the population fully vaccinated.

Across the U. S. counties as well, the median new COVID-19 cases per 100, 500 people in the last 7 days is largely similar across the categories of percent population fully vaccinated … There also appears to be simply no significant signaling of COVID-19 cases decreasing with increased percentages of population completely vaccinated …

The sole reliability on vaccination as a main strategy to mitigate COVID-19 as well as adverse consequences needs to be re-examined … Other pharmacological plus non-pharmacological interventions may need to be put in place alongside increasing vaccination rates.

Such course correction, especially with regards to the policy story, becomes paramount with rising scientific evidence on real world effectiveness of the vaccines.

For instance, in a report released from the Ministry of Health in Israel, the effectiveness of 2 dosages of the BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) shot against preventing COVID-19 contamination was reported to be 39%, substantially lower than the trial efficacy of 96%.

Additionally it is emerging that immunity derived from the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine might not be as strong as defenses acquired through recovery from your COVID-19 virus. A substantial drop in immunity from mRNA vaccines 6-months post immunization has also been reported.

Even though vaccinations offers protection to individuals against severe hospitalization and death, the CDC reported an increase from 0. 01 to 9% and 0 to 15. 1% (between January to May 2021) in the rates of hospitalizations and deaths, respectively, between the fully vaccinated. ”

“ The Truth About COVID-19” exposes the hidden agenda behind the pandemic, showing the countermeasures possess nothing to do with public health insurance and everything to do with ushering inside a new social and economy based on totalitarian, technocracy-led manage. So , it’s not misinformation these people fear. It’s the truth they would like to prevent from spreading. Grab a copy of this best-selling book today before it’s actual too late.