- In recent times, the pandemic narrative has undergone a remarkable number of U-turns
- January nine, 2022, CDC director Doctor Rochelle Walensky sent out the tweet saying “ We should protect people with comorbidities from severe COVID-19, ” put simply, focused protection, which is exactly what tens of thousands of doctors have been contacting for since the creation from the Great Barrington Declaration at the begining of October 2020
- January 10, 2022, Walensky admitted that the COVID pictures cannot prevent transmission
- The CDC is now saying you should not retest once you have recovered from COVID, because the PCR can provide false advantages for up to 12 weeks following the infection has been resolved. Most are also cutting the remoteness requirement from 10 in order to five days — probably because the failing economy is hurting Biden’s approval rating so they need people to work
- The narrative is also changing on what makes for a COVID case and exactly how deaths are counted. Walensky recently admitted about forty percent of “ COVID patients” tested positive but have no symptoms and are hospitalized to get something else. She has also promised to deliver data on how many people have actually died “ from” COVID and how numerous died “ with” it
Because noted by Dr . Ron Paul in the January ten, 2022, Liberty Report above, U. S. authorities have got suddenly started to change their particular tune with regard to COVID and the COVID shots.
“ The opposition to our position are starting to awaken, ” Paul says, as some shreds of truth are in fact starting to be acknowledged. The good news, John says, is that “ Maybe some of the things they’ve been stating are not quite accurate, and maybe what we’ve been saying can be closer to the truth, and maybe could possibly be starting to recognize that. ”
CDC Director Now Calls for Focused Protection
Indeed, in current days, the U. T. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has made an extraordinary number of U-turns, completely curing course on several story points.
For example , in a January 10, 2022, CNN interview, CDC movie director Dr . Rochelle Walensky really admitted that “ what [the COVID shots] aint able to do anymore is prevent transmission, ” 1 whereas before, the narrative was that in case you get the jab, you have absolutely nothing to worry about anymore. In Come july 1st 2021, President Biden promised that if you get vaccinated, “ you’re not going to get COVID. ” 2 Well, it wasn’t true. Many knew that, but were censored whenever pointing it out.
A day earlier, January 9, Walensky also sent out a tweet saying “ We must protect people with comorbidities from severe COVID-19, ” which is what tens of thousands of doctors have been calling for since the creation of The Great Barrington Declaration in early October 2020. It called for focused protection of high-risk individuals, such as the elderly, rather than blanket lockdowns.
It was recently revealed that Dr . Anthony Fauci, director of the Nationwide Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) great former boss, now retired National Institutes of Wellness (NIH) director Francis Collins, colluded behind the scenes to quash the declaration. several For whatever reason, Fauci and Collins were hell-bent on pushing economy-destroying lockdowns instead. In an October 6, 2020, email to Fauci, Collins wrote: 4, 5, 6, 7
“ The particular proposal from the three edge epidemiologists who met with the Secretary seems to be getting a wide range of attention … There needs to be a quick and devastating published take down of its premises … ”
“ Don’t get worried, I got this, ” Fauci replied. Later, Fauci delivered Collins links to recently published articles refuting the particular focused protection solution, which includes an op-ed in Wired magazine, and an article within the Nation, titled “ Concentrated Protection, Herd Immunity as well as other Deadly Delusions. ”
CDC Follows Politics Strategy, Not Science
Now, all of a sudden, Walensky is onboard with the “ deadly delusion” of concentrated protection. Her about-face would be confusing were it not for the fact that COVID countermeasures were never about protecting the public from a virus. From the beginning, the pandemic had politics goals, and it still really does.
The pressure is now on to prove the Biden administration has made some form of progress with the pandemic. Biden made a lot of promises, none of which have come to fruition, therefore now the political business is scrounging to come up with a few plan that can make them seem as though they’re getting somewhere.
The problem is that will cases are now exploding, each time a successful vaccine campaign should have brought the situation under control. Therefore , they now need a method to minimize the number of cases, while before, they used every single trick in the book to overcount them, 8 in order to scare individuals into complying with COVID restrictions and getting the jab.
New Assessment Guidance Aims to Lower Situation Rates
One simple way to cut down cases is to limit testing, and that’s an additional U-turn we’re now seeing. The CDC is now stating you should not retest once you’ve recovered from COVID. If you check positive, just quarantine intended for five days and don’t retest to confirm that you’re negative, since the PCR can provide false positives for up to 12 weeks after the infection has been resolved.
Well, we’ve recognized this for nearly two years already. From the start, experts warned which the PCR cannot be used to detect an active infection, as it can pick-up RNA from dead, noninfectious viral debris.
Health authorities are now rotating the tale that these revisions in guidance are because we have two years’ really worth of data, and they’re simply following the science. But that is pure baloney, seeing the way the data never supported their own COVID restrictions in the first place.
The CDC’s decision to revise quarantine guidelines down from 10 days to just five days also appears politically motivated. Polls show the economy is really a primary concern of voting Americans right now, so they need to strike a balance between the desired demolition of the economy and maintaining people at work — a minimum of until the 2022 elections are usually over.
There seems to be a LOT of sudden momentum surging in the direction of closing the pandemic. If Now i am right, we’re going to see a lot more of this, and pretty quickly, since Biden has to cover it up in time to declare victory on March 1 . ~ Jeff Childers
In short, I actually suspect most if not all the recent changes in COVID guidance is to build a narrative that the Biden administration has successfully brought the outbreak under control and reestablished a working economy. The change in narrative is based on political strategy, not science.
CDC Highlights Role of Comorbidities in Vaxxed COVID Deaths
As observed by Paul in the Freedom Report above, Walensky lately stated that 75% associated with COVID deaths had 4 or more comorbidities, “ So , really, these are people who were unwell to begin with. ” The particular admission went viral and was cited as proof that COVID is a lethal risk for none however the sickest among us.
The CDC quickly stepped in, clarifying that the lady meant “ 75% associated with COVID deaths among those who may have received the COVID jab, ” not COVID fatalities overall. 9 You can see the unedited segment above, where that will context is made clear. Still, we know that COVID poses hardly any risk for healthy unvaccinated people as well, and that comorbidities are a primary risk element regardless of your COVID jab status.
COVID Death Risk Has Always Been Low — Vaxxed or Not
For example , a 2020 study 10 found 88% associated with hospitalized COVID patients within New York City had two or more comorbidities, 6. 3% had a single underlying health condition and 6. 1% had none.
In late August 2020, the CDC published data showing only 6% of the total death count had COVID-19 listed as the only cause of death. The remaining 94% had had an average associated with 2 . 6 comorbidities or preexisting health conditions that added to their deaths. 11 So , indeed, COVID is a lethal danger only for the sickest in our midst, just as Walensky said, yet that’s true whether occur to be “ vaccinated” or not.
As for the study 12 Walensky discussed in that “ Good Morning America” segment, it discovered that of the 1 . 2 million COVID jabbed topics, only 0. 0033% passed away of COVID between Dec 2020 and October 2021. (And of those, 77. 8% had four or more comorbidities. ) This study, Walensky claims as evidence the COVID shot works miracles to reduce the risk of death.
But does it actually? Recall studies 13 showing the noninstitutionalized infection fatality rate is on average just 0. 26% to begin with, and people beneath the age of 40 have merely a 0. 01% risk of dying from COVID. 14
When we’re talking about a fraction of a percentage stage risk, we’re talking about a risk that is close to statistical zero. So , does lowering your risk of death from 0. 01% to 0. 003% really translate into something worthwhile? And, more importantly, is the fact that reduction worth the risks associated with taking the jab?
Clearly, it’s not a free of risk decision. OneAmerica, a national mutual life insurance company, recently warned that all-cause deaths among working age Americans (18 to 64) are up 40% over prepandemic norms, 15 and they cannot be related to COVID.
So , what’s causing these fatalities? What potentially deadly thing did tens of millions of Americans do in 2021 that they’ve never done before? I am going to let you ponder whether Walensky’s claim that the COVID jab is saving lives is an accurate one.
CDC Admits Large Part of ‘ COVID Patients’ Do not get
In another recent media appearance, Walensky stated that: sixteen
“ In some hospitals that we’ve talked in order to, up to 40% of the sufferers who are coming in with COVID-19 are coming in not because they’re sick with COVID, but because they’re coming in with something else and have experienced … COVID or the Omicron variant detected. ”
This, again, is something that we have been highlighting since the start of the pandemic. Most so-called “ COVID patients” simply weren’t, but still aren’t. They’re hospitalized designed for something else entirely, and just occur to get a positive test result upon admission — which usually very possibly is a fake positive. Either way, voila, they may a COVID patient, despite the fact that they’re hospitalized for a damaged leg or a heart attack.
As noted simply by Delta News TV, “ Comments like these have forged doubt on the severity of the current COVID surge even while the Supreme Court views legal challenges to Biden’s sweeping private sector mandates on that very concern. ” 17
Is the Politics Pandemic in Its Final Loss of life Throes?
In the January 10, 2022, post, 18 Jeff Childers, an attorney, and the president and founder of Childers Law firm, presents a hypothesis for why we might be looking at the end of the outbreak, as the Biden administration provides “ no reasonable alternative but to wrap this whole thing up in the next over 8 weeks or so. ”
“ There’s an interesting political dynamic framing up, a kind of political vice grip that might just be generating federal COVID policy toward authenticity and an end to the pandemic … a lot of reality has been breaking through lately, ” Childers writes. 19
He or she points out how a federal assess recently ordered the U. S. Food and Drug Administration to release all the Pfizer COVID jab data that the agency wanted 75 years to release. The bulk of that data is now due March 1, 2022, the day of Biden’s State of the Union address. Childers suspects the Pfizer paperwork will contain plenty of counternarrative fodder and politically uncomfortable details.
Exactly why We’re Seeing a U-Turn in the Narrative Now
Biden needs some good news by his State of the Union address, as it will probably be his last chance to “ help move the needle back toward blue, ” and the way he can accomplish that is by declaring the pandemic over. He can then claim to be the great liberator who ended the outbreak measures for good.
“ If they handle this right, they could give their voting bottom and sycophantic media real estate agents all the necessary talking points to boost Dem prospects for your midterm elections, ” Childers writes. 20
But to pull off that U-turn with any semblance of credibility, they need to start cutting the case price now, and that’s precisely what we are going to seeing. For example , the CDC recently changed its guidelines so you don’t need to retest after you have recovered from COVID, so no more false positives from recovered people.
Florida’s official policy has become to only test high-risk individuals and those who are symptomatic. Childers points out that the left-leaning Sun Sentinel even ran a write-up highlighting the fact that despite surging case rates, Florida has the lowest COVID death rate in the nation, second simply to the sparsely populated Ak. “ What incredibly powerful force could make the Sun Sentinel downplay the pandemic like this? ” he asks.
Will We Finally Get a More Accurate Death Rely?
The CDC also appears poised to improve the definition of COVID death to what it should have been all of the along. Childers notes:
“ Fox News … Bret Baier … asked [Walensky] ‘ how many of the 836, 000 deaths in the U. S. linked to COVID are FROM COVID or how many are WITH COVID? ‘
Director Walensky said … ‘ those people data will be forthcoming. ‘ Until about 10 minutes back, the CDC said it didn’t HAVE any way to track that kind of information … But now, apparently, CDC plans to release information about deaths through and with. What do you want to bet they’ll be REDUCING total COVID deaths shortly? By a great deal. ”
They’re also beginning to accurately count only those people who are actually sick with COVID rather than including people hospitalized for other reasons who simply happen to test positive.
“ Yesterday, New York Governor Hochul announced that almost HALF of patients are hospitalized for ‘ non-COVID reasons, ‘ scattering the rotting corpse from the Narrative.
You might recall that just last week she purchased hospitals to start breaking down the reported figures and displaying how many folks ACTUALLY are sick and tired with COVID versus simply testing positive in the medical center. We’ve been yelling about overcounting hospitalizations for two years right now and they just noticed? ” 21
Exact same Narrative Switch Seen in European countries
The same sudden switch in narrative can be seen in Europe. Childers proceeds: 22
“ Yesterday, the Guardian UNITED KINGDOM ran a story headlined, ‘ End mass jabs and live with COVID, says ex-head of vaccine taskforce. ‘ It says Dr . Clive Dix — former chief of the UK’s vaccine taskforce — has called for a ‘ major rethink’ from the UK’s COVID strategy, in effect reversing the approach of the past two years and returning to a ‘ new normality. ‘
Shocking the cores the oft-maligned authors from the Great Barrington Declaration, Doctor Dix — without obtaining cancelled — said this particular:
‘ We need to analyze whether or not we use the current booster campaign to ensure the vulnerable are protected, if this is seen to be necessary … Mass population-based vaccination in the UK should now end. ‘ Ending bulk vaccinations? Suddenly that concept is okay to discuss within the corporate media? Wow. ”
In a January 3, 2022, interview with the Daily Telegraph, professor Andrew Pollard, mind of the U. K. ‘s Committee on Vaccination and Immunization who helped develop the Oxford-AstraZeneca shot, furthermore made a previously verboten statement: “ We can not vaccinate the planet every 4 or six months, ” he or she said. “ It’s not environmentally friendly or affordable. ” 23 Plus, like Dix, Pollard had not been canceled, censored or deplatformed.
January eleven, 2022, Bloomberg also reported that “ European Union government bodies warned that frequent COVID-19 booster shots could negatively affect the immune response and could not be feasible. Repeat booster doses every four months could eventually weaken the particular immune response and tire out people, according to the Euro Medicines Agency. ” 24
Marco Cavaleri, the EMA’s head of vaccines technique, said during a January eleven, 2022, press briefing: 25
“ Whilst use of additional boosters can be part of contingency plans, repetitive vaccinations within short periods would not represent a lasting long-term strategy. [Boosters] can be done once, or possibly twice, but it’s not something that we can think should be repetitive constantly. We need to think about how we can transition from the present pandemic setting to a more endemic setting. ”
That will same day, the World Health Organization’s Technical Advisory Group on COVID-19 Vaccine Structure (TAG-CO-VAC) also issued the statement 26 saying that “ a vaccination strategy based on repetitive booster doses of the unique vaccine composition is improbable to be appropriate or eco friendly. ”
They also stated that COVID vaccines that actually prevent infection plus transmission need to be developed. The particular timing of all these statements is nothing if not outstanding. It shows just how matched this plandemic narrative is, all around the world.
Justice Sotomayor Called Out
Perhaps the best example that the narrative is definitely undergoing a radical overhaul, Childers says, is Best Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor being fact checked plus called out as a liar by The Washington Post:
“ You’ll recall that Sotomayor confidently told the lawyers during oral argument Friday that ‘ 100, 000′ children were in vital care and on ventilators along with Omicron. The lawyers didn’t challenge her even though presently there aren’t that many total ICU beds in the whole country.
But on Saturday — the next day! — the Washington Post ran an article headlined, ‘ Sotomayor’s false declare that ‘ over 100, 000′ children are in ‘ serious condition’ with COVID. ‘ FALSE CLAIM?? What?? Here’s how the fact-checking article finished:
‘ It’s important for Supreme Court justices to make rulings based on correct data … But Sotomayor during an oral argument offered a figure — 100, 500 children in ‘ serious condition … many upon ventilators’ — that is absurdly high. She earns 4 Pinocchios. ‘ It might be unparalleled for a major liberal paper to call out the liberal Justice. What might be going on? …
There seems to be considered a LOT of sudden momentum surging in the direction of ending the outbreak. If I’m right, we’ll see even more of this, and pretty quickly, since Biden has to wrap it up with time to declare victory upon March 1 . Which would describe why they pushed the particular SOTU back a month. They require the time to get the pandemic covered up. ” twenty-seven
As most of you know, I’ve been forced to remove quarter of a century of free health information from the website under threats of the technocratic elite.
By well-known demand, I am pleased to share with you an exciting update — the entire Censored Library offers finally returned! Through Substack, an information sharing platform, I am once again able to share with you all of the valuable research I have collected through the years.
My everyday newsletter is still free plus content will be released upon Mercola. com before somewhere else. After 48 hours the particular articles will be transferred to our Censored Library on Substack. To view any missed content material, a private membership is available to get a very minimal amount with a portion of proceeds going toward our health partners who are helping in the fight to protect the freedom of speech and your right to take control of your health.