Former Intel Officials Beg Congress To Preserve Big Tech Monopoly Power To Combat Russia ‘Disinformation’

Several of these Heavy Staters were behind the 2020 letter falsely declaring that the Hunter Biden notebook story was “Russian disinformation. “

A familiar group of former intelligence officials composed a letter calling on Congress to protect Big Tech’s monopoly power over the flow associated with online information in the name of national security, namely to fight against Russian “ disinformation. ”

The particular letter, signed by Obama-era DHS, CIA, and DNI officials on Monday, warns that pending legislation seeking to break up Google, Facebook, and Amazon’s monopoly would endanger national security and weaken US policy to fight back against Russia and China’s “ digital authoritarianism. ”

“ In the face of these growing threats, U. S. policymakers must not unintentionally hamper the ability of Oughout. S. technology platforms in order to counter increasing disinformation and cybersecurity risks, particularly because the West continues to rely on the particular scale and reach of those firms to push back around the Kremlin, ” the authorities wrote.

“ But recently proposed congressional legislation would unintentionally curtail the ability of these platforms to target disinformation efforts and safeguard the security of their users in the U. S. and globally. ”

These Deep State authorities then call on numerous congressional committees with close ties to the national security condition to review all legislation that will seek to break up Big Tech or promote marketplace competition in the social media area.

“ We all call on the congressional committees with national security legal system – including the Armed Services Committees, Intelligence Committees, and Homeland Security Committees in both the House and Senate – to conduct a review of any kind of legislation that could hinder Many key technology companies in the fight against cyber and national security risks emanating from Russia’s and China’s growing digital authoritarianism. ”

Journalist Glenn Greenwald noted in his SubStack upon Wednesday that these officials possess a vested financial and politics interest to protect Big Tech’s “ stranglehold on political discourse”, and their notice is a blatant “ react of desperation. ”

Needless to say, the U. S. safety state wants to maintain the stranglehold on political talk in the U. S. as well as the world more broadly. They want to be able to impose propagandistic narratives without challenge and endorse for militarism without refuse. To accomplish that, they need a little handful of corporations which are subservient to them to hold in their fingers as much concentrated power on the internet as possible.

If a free plus fair competitive market would be to arise whereby social media platforms more devoted to free talk could fairly compete with Search engines and Facebook— as the different pending bills in Our elected representatives are partially designed to create — then that brand new diversity of influence, that diffusion of power, would certainly genuinely threaten the ability of the CIA and the Pentagon as well as the White House to law enforcement political discourse and suppress dissent from their policies plus assertions. By contrast, by maintaining all power in the hands of the small coterie associated with tech monopolies which manage the internet and which have long proven their loyalty to the U. S. security state, the ability of the U. H. national security state to keep a closed propaganda program around questions of war and militarism is guaranteed.

It’s critical to note that will several of these officials, including previous National Security Agency main James Clapper, former CIA/Pentagon director Leon Panetta, plus former acting CIA chief Mike Morell were among the 50 intelligence officials who falsely stated in Oct 2020 that the Hunter Biden laptop story was “ Russian disinformation. ”

But the Hunter Biden story was so thoroughly documented and verified simply by numerous news outlets that even The brand new York Times eventually had to admit Hunter’s laptop was authentic.

The 50 intel officials have still refused to apologize for deceptive the American people designed for claiming without evidence that will Hunter’s laptop was Ruskies disinformation.

That alone is smoking gun evidence that these former cleverness officials don’t give a riff about “ disinformation, ” rather they’re worried that will Big Tech’s ability to improve the Deep State’s censorship and propaganda policies domestically and abroad is now vulnerable.

See the Deep State letter:

Twitter: @WhiteIsTheFury

Gab: @WhiteIsTheFury

Minds: @WhiteIsTheFury

Gettr: @WhiteIsTheFury

Elon Musk Inside a No Lose Situation Since Big Tech Oligarchs Scramble To Stop His Purchase Associated with Twitter

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *