IMF Director Admits “We Imprinted too Much Money”

Basically, she’s saying, “Oops! Our bad! All of us messed up because we did not consider the unintended consequences. But we’re going to do better next time because our focus will be right on point. ”

Mainly we get lies, spin and obfuscation from main bankers, politicians and bureaucrats. But every once in a while, one of these people accidentally wanders to the truth.

IMF Director Kristalina Georgieva did just that during a recent panel discussion hosted by CNBC. She conceded that central banks globally “ printed too much money and did not think of unintended consequences. ”

I think we are not paying enough attention to the law of unintentional consequences. We take choices with an objective in mind plus rarely think through what can happen that is not our objective. After which we wrestle with the influence of it.

“ Take any decision this is a massive decision, like the choice that we need to spend to support the economy. At that time, all of us did recognize that maybe too much money in circulation and too little goods, but didn’t really quite think through the result in a way that upfront would have well informed better what we do. ”

Exactly how this economic brain rely on missed failed to consider that will injecting trillions into the economic climate would cause prices to increase is a bit of a head-scratcher. This really is economics 101. Expanding the money supply pushes prices more than they otherwise would be. I actually knew this would happen. Philip Schiff knew this would occur. Heck, you probably knew this could happen. But the people billed with running the global economic climate didn’t?

This type of person either wildly incompetent, or even they are lying to you.

Either way, they are “ bad economists” as described by Fré dé ric Bastiat.

‘ Between a good and a bad economist this constitutes the whole difference — the one takes account of the visible effect; the other takes accounts both of the effects that are seen, and also of those which it is necessary to foresee. ”

Good on Georgieva, I guess. It is said admitting your problem is the initial step on the road to recovery. Therefore , you might think this confession is a step forward. But I guarantee you, it’s not.   The ego, arrogance, and hubris   that make these people think they can micromanage the global economy remain strongly in place. They just think they need to try a little bit harder.

Although Georgieva confesses a mistake, the rest of her comment reveals she hasn’t learned the lesson.

We act occasionally like eight years old playing soccer. Here is the ball, we are all at the ball. And we avoid cover the rest of the field.

“ Our ability to deal with more than one crisis in the past is very, very limited. and we need to zero in on the actually big things that could determine the future and keep our interest on them. ”

Basically, she’s stating, “ Oops! Our bad! We messed up because all of us didn’t consider the unintended effects. But we’re going to do better the next time because our focus will be right on point. ”

Georgieva, Powell, Biden, LaGarde, and the whole lot of these central planners don’t understand that it is impossible for them to take into account all the unintended consequences of a given policy prescription. That’s why main planning is always doomed to failure.

Economist F. A. Hayek have got to the root of the problem in the seminal paper,   “ The Use of Knowledge in Society. ” In summary, Hayek concluded that central planning will always fail because it is difficult for the central planners to enjoy all of the information necessary to aspect in all of the ramifications of any given policy.

“ The knowledge of the circumstances of which we must make use never ever exists in concentrated or integrated form, but solely as the dispersed bits of imperfect and frequently contradictory knowledge which all the separate individuals possess. ”

Or as FEE put it in its introduction to Hayek’s function:

“ Hayek points out that properly allocating scarce resources needs knowledge dispersed among many people, with no individual or number of experts capable of acquiring it all. ”

Simply put, unintended consequences are usually inevitable in central planning. No matter how hard the main planner try, they are going to miss stuff. No matter how smart an individual or a group of individuals may be, they don’t have all of the knowledge they need. They can’t have it. It’s impossible.

The problem is that people like Georgieva miss this. They they their own crew is smart enough, smart enough and that they care sufficient to get the job done. If the make a mistake, they will just need to try harder.

And that’s where these people wrong. They need to quit attempting, get out of the way and let the marketplace function.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *