Any doubt that many progressives have abandoned their dedication to free speech has been erased by the hysterical a reaction to Elon Musk’s effort to purchase Twitter and return the business to its roots like a free speech zone. Previous Labor Secretary Robert Reich and “ woke” neocon Max Boot fretted that will Musk’s commitment to totally free speech threatens democracy. Those confused by how totally free speech threatens democracy ought to remember that for neoconservatives and many progressives democracy means allowing the people to choose between two largely identical supporters from the welfare-warfare state. In this version of “ democracy, ” those whose views are outside the welfare-warfare mainstream — such as libertarians — are marginalized.
More ominous than the griping of ex-government officials and pundits was the threat associated with prominent Democratic politicians in order to haul Musk before Our elected representatives. These politicians likely want an opportunity to smear Musk and other supporters of free speech as promoters of hate and Russian (and/or Chinese) disinformation.
Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Dick Durbin and other Senate Democrats, nothing of whom seem to have read the First Amendment, are also checking out whether it would be “ appropriate” for Congress to pressure tech companies to “ moderate” content on their systems.
President Biden is not waiting for legislation in order to ramp up the attack upon free speech. His administration has created the Disinformation Governance Board located in the Section of Homeland Security. The particular board’s purpose is to coordinate government and private sector efforts to combat “ disinformation, ” with a concentrate on Russia. The focus on The ussr is not surprising since “ Russian disinformation” has became a member of racism and sexism like a go-to justification to smear and silence those whose views (and factual information) contradict the political plus media establishment’s “ party line. ”
Biden’s choice to mind the Disinformation Governance Table, Nina Jankowicz, is a spreader of disinformation herself. In 2020, for example , Jankowicz parroted the lie that Russia created the damning materials found on Hunter Biden’s notorious laptop. Jankowicz’s ré sumé also includes stints being an advisor to the Ukraine govt and a manager of National Democratic Institute programs in Russia and Belarus. Jankowicz’s background suggests she will never ever call any lie peddled by the US war celebration “ disinformation. ”
The Disinformation Governance Board may not directly censor social media. However , by “ encouraging” tech companies desperate to maintain good relations with all the federal government to remove “ unapproved” opinions from their platforms, it could achieve the same results. For this reason anyone who values free talk, which should include everyone whom cherishes liberty, should not discover the claim that tech companies’ behavior is nothing to be concerned about since it does not involve federal government censorship.
Sadly, some misguided conservatives have got joined progressives in promoting legislation imposing new regulations upon big tech. Increased regulation will only empower Nina Jankowicz and her ilk to help pressure tech companies to restrict free speech. It will also harm consumers by reducing the ability to find affordable goods and services on the internet. The only way to protect free talk on the internet is to make on the internet platforms truly private by way of a complete separation of tech and state.
The drive to censor is driven by the woke mob and authoritarian establishment’s fear that their insurance policies could not maintain majority support if forced to compete in a free market of suggestions. This shows that even foes of liberty sense that the days of the welfare-warfare condition are numbered.