Leftists Hate Free Speech Because They Fear Dissent, Not “Disinformation”

There is absolutely no such thing as a “center” in our society anymore, either you lean conservative and you support freedom, or you trim left and support authoritarianism.

I think one of the most bizarre social developments of the past 10 years in the US has been the slow but steady shift of the political left since supposed defenders of free speech to enemies of free conversation.

The level of mental gymnastics on display by leftists to justify their attacks on independence and the 1 saint   Amendment will be bewildering. So much so that I begin to question if liberals and leftists ever actually had any respect for 1 st   Amendment rights to begin with? Or even, maybe the only freedom they will cared about all along was the freedom to watch pornography…

One can view the steady progression of this battle on speech and ideas, and the end game will be predictable: Is anyone really that surprised that the Biden Administration is implementing a Ministry of Truth by means of the  DHS Disinformation Governance Board ? Can we just accept the truth at this point that leftists are evil and their efforts feed into an agenda associated with authoritarianism? Is there any proof to the contrary?

Before I get into this issue, I think it’s important to point out it’s far becoming tiresome to hear quarrels these days suggesting that conference leftists “ somewhere in the middle” is the best and most appealing option. I see this attitude all over the place and I think it comes from the certain naivety about the situation we are facing as a country. Moderates and “ normies” along with people like Costs Maher and Russell Brand name are FINALLY starting to realize how bag-lady-crazy leftists are usually and the pendulum is moving back slightly. But , it had been conservatives that were calling away the social justice cult and their highway to hell for years.

While everyone else was blissfully ignorant, we were fighting the battles that stalled the leftist advance. This is not to express I’m not happy to have moderates and reformed liberals on board, it’s a great thing. However , the time for diplomacy and meeting leftists halfway is long dead.

There is absolutely no such thing as a “ center” in our society any more, either you lean conservative and you support freedom, or else you lean left and assistance authoritarianism. There is no magical and Utopian in-between that we need to achieve to make things right. We are not required to endure leftist authoritarianism because of “ democracy. ” Sometimes particular ideologies and certain groups are mutually exclusive to freedom; meaning, they cannot coexist within a society that values liberty.

We need to be clear about in which the lines are drawn, due to the fact sitting on the fence is just not an option. Walk in center of road? Get squished like grape.

To understand how leftists got to the point of enthusiastic hate of free speech rights there are some psychological and philosophical aspects that need to be addressed. These include specific ideals that leftists value that are disjointed or simply just irrational:

Hate Speech Is True And Must Be Censored?

First, when i have argued for many years, there is absolutely no such thing as “ hate speech. ” There is speech that some people don’t like and speech they are upset by. That is all.

Constitutionally, there is no dislike speech. People are allowed to say any offensive thing they will wish and believe however they wish as long as they are not slandering a person’s reputation with lies or threatening them with direct bodily harm. If you are upset by criticism, that is your problem.

Leftists believe the opposite. Instead of growing the thicker skin they believe that “ hate speech” ought to be illegal and that they should be the people that determine what hate speech is usually. This is a kind of magical door to power, because if you can declare yourself the arbiter of hate speech you give yourself the expert to control ALL speech. That is to say, as the thought police all you have to do is label all you don’t like as hate talk, no matter how factual, and you now dictate the course of modern society.

No one is capable of this kind of objectivity or benevolence. No person alive is able to determine what speech is suitable without bias. Like the One Ring in the Lord of The Rings, there is no individual or group capable of wielding this kind of power without being corrupted because of it. Either there is no hate presentation, or everything becomes hate speech.

Free Speech Is Negated By Property Rights?

This is within direct reference to social media web sites and it’s an oversimplification of the issue of free speech and large social media platforms. Right here is the conundrum or “ false paradigm” if you will:

Leftists argue with regard to private property rights, yet only when it comes to vast corporate big tech platforms such as Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, etc . They like private home rights for companies which they think are on their side politically; they hate private property rights for everyone otherwise. Just look at their response to Elon Musk’s recent Twitter buyout; the leftists are demanding that Musk be stopped at all costs, and they need that the SEC and FCC step in to disrupt the sale because they claim Musk’s purchase  is a “ threat to democracy. ”

The media itself is clamoring to disrupt Musk’s takeover of Twitter. Whether or not you trust him, Musk’s purchase of the platform has at least uncovered the totalitarian attitudes of mainstream journalists for everyone to see. They are now even acknowledging on air that  THEY control public conversation ; that it is “ their job, ” and they discover Musk as a threat to that monopoly.

Why are Elon Musk’s private real estate rights less important or protected than the original shareholders of Twitter (Vangaurd, BlackRock, Morgan Stanley and a Saudi Prince)? Because Musk does not claim to represent leftist styles and interests? Leftists have zero principles, they only value manufacturing consent. Their method of winning requires that they never ever restrict themselves within the limitations of values or morals. Again, this is the epitome of natural evil.

Further than that irony, though, is the deeper issue of authorities intervention vs business legal rights. Many people seem to think that federal government power is supposed to balance out business power when the truth is that governments and corporations function hand in hand; they are often one within the same entity.

Twitter and other Big Tech platforms receive billions on billions of dollars in government stimulus and tax bonuses every year. Corporations as a concept are essentially a socialist creation. They enjoy restricted liability and corporate personhood along with other special protections under government charter. With all these types of protections, incentives, bailouts plus stimulus measures it is almost impossible for small and brand new businesses to compete with all of them. They represent a monopoly through cartel; they control the marketplace by colluding with each other and colluding with the federal government.

A perfect example of this would be the coordination between multiple Big Tech companies to bring down Parler, the conservative leaning competitor in order to Twitter. This required some of the biggest companies in the world doing work in unison along with the blessing associated with government officials to affect the ability of a new organization to offer an alternative, and all due to the fact Parler was getting too large.

In the case of a private person’s home or their particular small business or small web site, it’s true that there are no free speech rights. They could kick you out and they don’t have to give a reason. But when it comes to massive conglomerates that will receive billions in OUR taxes dollars in order to stay alive, no, they do not deserve private property rights. They have now made themselves into a open public utility, and that means they may be subject to constitutional limitations just like public schools and educational institutions are.

This is a concept that leftists just don’t grasp. They view corporate power as sacrosanct… as long as it serves their interests.

Think about global corporations like The disney produtcions and their open intention to undermine the passage of Florida’s anti-grooming costs; this represents Disney’s singing support for the sexualization plus indoctrination of children in California schools. Leftists cheered the particular announcement and claimed that will without Disney, Florida’s economic climate would be wrecked. Instead, their state turned the tables plus took away incentives they had been giving to The disney produtcions for decades. Leftists responded by accusing Governor DeSantis of being a “ fascist” plus attacking free speech.

But let’s split this down: Leftists gladly supported Disney, a massive conglomerate, and their efforts in order to undermine the will from the voters in Florida. Their state government stops them from undermining the voters by taking away the money and special incentives that belong to the particular voters. In turn, leftists claim this is a violation of Disney’s rights?

The disparity between leftist arguments on Elon Musk’s takeover of Twitter vs . Disney’s attempted sabotage of Fl law could not be more puzzled. When it comes to Twitter they love the idea of censorship and respond with panic when the simple prospect of free speech (within the confines of US law) is presented. When it comes to Disney, they say they love the idea of free speech, and anyone that wants to limit the businesses influence within Florida, regardless of how criminal, is accused of fascism.

The is obvious – Musk appears to be an uncontrolled component, while Disney is an “ ally. ” Free presentation and property rights are just allowed for one side from the cultural divide. Leftists attacking freedom is free speech; defending ourselves against individuals attacks is a threat in order to democracy. It’s absurd.

Disinformation Is A Threat And Censorship May be the Solution?

The holy grail of censorship is not website filters and algorithms, because as we have observed with Twitter, those platforms could be built or purchased by someone that does not share in the leftist agenda. Rather, government intervention and the ability to define what is proper plus improper discourse is the supreme goal. The end game associated with authoritarians is always to write mass censorship into law, as though it is justified once it really is codified.

Corporate elites and political puppets like Biden pontificating regarding the threat of “ disinformation” is hilarious for a number of factors, but mainly because it is the energy brokers and the media which have been the main purveyors of disinformation for a long time. Suddenly today they will care about the spread of lies?

I think it is obvious that such people are far more worried about the spread of facts, evidence and truth. They cannot argument on fair ground simply because they will lose, so , the only additional option is to silence us. The institution of the Disinformation Governance Board is a apparent indication that the establishment as well as the useful idiots on the politics left are becoming DESPERATE.

Their grip in the public mind is slipping, and we saw this throughout their recent attempts to enforce medical tyranny across the country in the name of covid. Luckily, conservatives within at least 20 red declares fought against the implementation of covid lockdowns, mandates plus vaccine passports which would have got annihilated our constitutional legal rights forever.

For years I heard the disagreement that when the jackboots showed up conservatives would do nothing, and now we know this is nonsense. Some of the few free places on the planet during two years of outbreak fear mongering were red-colored states in America, which somehow also have the highest concentration of conservatives.

If you want to know what our country would certainly look like had conservatives not stopped the tide of tyranny, just take a gander at China today. They have some of the strictest covid mandates on the planet and yet they are once more locking down millions of residents due to “ high illness rates. ” Not only that, however they are starving their own individuals in the process.

It can madness, and it’s exactly what leftists were arguing in favor of only a few months ago. The US is mainly open today, just as reddish states like mine are free for almost the whole of the pandemic, and what has changed? Half the country is still unvaccinated – Is there mass dying in the streets? Nope. Absolutely nothing has changed in terms of covid. The mandates made no difference whatsoever, other than to affect the economy and reduce householder’s freedoms.

Recently, pointing out this truth was considered “ disinformation” that needed to be silenced to be able to “ save lives. ” The Hunter Biden laptop computer story was called disinformation. The Wuhan Lab story was called disinformation. Fauci’s gain of function research on covid at the Wuhan lab was called disinformation. The fact that vaccinated people nevertheless contract and die through covid was called disinformation. In other words, what the government and corporate oligarchs call “ disinformation” today is ultimately called reality tomorrow.

I would be pleased to enter into a fair debate with White House Press Admin Jen Psaki on any of the above issues and her views of what comprises “ disinformation, ” yet she would never do this kind of thing because she knows she would be crushed like a bug. It is not the government’s job to protect the public from information, whether real or even fake. It is not their work to filter or censor data or ideas. They may not be qualified to do this. No one is certainly.

Leftists function from a collectivist mentality which makes them believe that society is really a singular entity that needs to be managed and manipulated to achieve the desired outcome. They have simply no concept of individual responsibility plus discernment, but that is a side note to the real issue. They support information control because facts and concepts outside of their narrative probably will damage that narrative. And, if the narrative is broken they lose their feeling of power, which is just about all they really care about.

If your narrative is so fragile that it does not hold up to scrutiny or option viewpoints then it must not be worth much of a damn. If you have to drive people or manipulate individuals into believing the way you do, then your ideology must be fundamentally flawed. The truth speaks quantities for itself and eventually benefits without force. Only lies need to be forced into the group consciousness. Only lies require tyranny.

Eventually reality wins over propaganda, unless total censorship plus totalitarianism can be achieved. Nothing is promoting in the 200+ years because the creation of the Bill of Rights. Free speech remains integral to a functioning community. Without it, society crumbles. They will claim that today details are different and that society needs to be “ protected from itself. ” This is what tyrants consistently say when trying to grab power.

Most people reading this know by now that this is a war. It’s not a political debate that requires give-and-take, but a full-bore winner-take-all conflict. A DHS faction which is mandated to monitor our own speech and propagandize the general public is unacceptable and must be eliminated. Leftist and globalist monopoly of social media communications platforms is unacceptable plus must be eliminated. The imposition of leftist and globalist ideology into the media story while censoring any opposite information is unacceptable and must be eliminated. This is regarding saving the remaining embers associated with American culture. If we tend not to take an aggressive stand now, the next generation might never know liberty. Everything all of us hold dear is at risk.


2000 Mules: Smoking Gun Video Shows 2020 Was Stolen Through Trump

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *