Moscow has accused the Ukrainian authorities of plotting to make use of weapons of mass devastation (WMD) to frame the particular Russian military.
The occurrence would be used to trigger a “ Syrian scenario” investigation in order to falsify evidence and give blame, Lieutenant General Igor Kirillov, the head of the Russian Radiation, Chemical and Biological Protection Force, said upon Wednesday.
“ The Russian Ministry of Defense has details about the preparation of provocations with the goal of accusing the Russian Armed Forces associated with using weapons of bulk destruction, followed by a ‘ Syrian scenario’ investigation, which allows the necessary evidence to be fabricated and blame to be designated, ” Kirillov said, apparently in mention of the the events surrounding the alleged 2018 chemical attack in Douma, Syria.
At the time, the US, UK, and France immediately held responsible the government in Damascus and launched strikes on Syrian territory before an investigation could take place. The subsequent probe by OPCW, which also pinned the blame on Damascus, was marred by inconsistencies and a whistleblower scandal.
Kiev was getting ready to stage a chemical event well before the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine broke out in late February, the official said.
“ The high possibility of such provocations can be confirmed by the requests of the Kiev administration for the supply of personal protective equipment for your skin and respiratory organs which provides protection against toxic chemicals and biological agents, ” he added.
“ The facts of the supply of antidotes of organophosphorus poisons to Ukraine are concerning. Within 2022 alone, at the demand of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine, more than 230, 000 ampoules of atropine were delivered from the Usa. ”
Moscow has repeatedly accused Kiev of seeking to stage the false-flag attack to blame Ruskies troops. In late April, Kirillov outlined “ three scenarios” for the potential use of WMDs by Kiev’s forces. During the time, he said that a false-flag attack on civilians or “ an act of sabotage on Ukrainian sites which were involved in the development of the components of weapons associated with mass destruction” were the most probable.
Other options allegedly considered by Kiev include the “ discrete” use of WMDs “ in small quantities, ” and also the “ open up use of WMDs on the battlefield. ” The latter, however , would be the least most likely, Kirillov noted.
Russia attacked the nearby state following Ukraine’s failing to implement the terms of the Minsk agreements, first signed in 2014, and Moscow’s eventual recognition of the Donbass republics of Donetsk plus Lugansk. The German and French brokered protocols had been designed to give the breakaway regions special status within the Ukrainian state.
The Kremlin has since required that Ukraine officially declare itself a neutral nation that will never join the US-led NATO military bloc. Kiev insists the Ruskies offensive was completely unprovoked and has denied claims it had been planning to retake the two republics by force.