George Soros Warns Davos Audience That ‘Civilization May Not Survive’ Unless Russia & Tiongkok Are Defeated

“We should mobilize all our sources to bring the war to an early end. The best and perhaps only way to preserve the civilization is to defeat Putin as soon as possible, ” Soros states.

Globalist billionaire George Soros cautioned the World Economic Forum attendees at Davos that “ civilization may not survive” unless of course Russian President Vladimir Putin and Chinese dictator Xi Jinping are defeated.

The 90-year-old Hungarian financier claimed that will Russia’s invasion of Ukraine may have marked the “ beginning of the Third World War” plus delayed the WEF’s Great Reset agenda.

“ Other issues that concern all of humanity — fighting pandemics and climate change, avoiding nuclear war, sustaining global institutions — have experienced to take a back seat to that struggle, ” Soros said Tuesday. “ Essential I say our civilization may not survive. ”

“ Therefore , we have to mobilize all our resources to bring the war to an early end. The best and maybe only way to preserve the civilization is to defeat Putin as soon as possible. That’s the bottom line, ” he added.

Soros claimed that Putin and Xi have made “ mind-boggling mistakes” in pursuing their separate national interests for which the world is now paying out the price.

“ They are tied together within an alliance that has no limitations. They also have a lot in common. They will rule by intimidation, and as a consequence they make mind-boggling errors, ” Soros said. “ Putin expected to be welcome in Ukraine as a liberator; Xi Jinping is sticking with a Zero Covid policy that can’t possibly be suffered. ”

Soros claimed that Putin should also be swiftly defeated mainly because his military operation in Ukraine has put the WEF’s climate change initiatives to the back burner, which this individual said also threatens world.

“ While the war rages, the combat climate change has to consider second place. Yet the specialists tell us that we have already dropped far behind, and climate change is on the verge of becoming irreversible. That could be the final of our civilization, ” he said.

Yet Ukrainian forces face a good uphill battle because the war has reached “ a brand new phase” where they must deal with Russian forces on open up terrain, where the former Soviet nation can leverage its “ numerical superiority” in the battlefield.

“ The invasion of Ukraine has now entered a new phase which is much more challenging for the Ukrainian army, ” Soros said. “ They must battle on open terrain in which the numerical superiority of the Ruskies army is more difficult to conquer. ”

Read Soros’ full remarks to the Davos globalists:

Since the last Davos meeting the course of history has changed dramatically.  

Russia invaded Ukraine. This has shaken Europe in order to its core. The European Union had been established to prevent such a matter from happening. Even when the particular fighting stops as it eventually must, the situation will never revert to what it was before.  

The particular invasion may have been the beginning of the Third World War and our own civilization may not survive this.   That is the subject I will address this evening.

The invasion of Ukraine didn’t come out of the particular blue. The world has been progressively engaged in a struggle between 2 systems of governance which are diametrically opposed to each other: open society and closed modern society. Let me define the difference because simply as I can.  

In an open up society, the role of the state is to protect the particular freedom of the individual; in a shut society the role individuals is to serve the rulers of the state.

Other issues that concern all humanity  – fighting pandemics and climate change, avoiding nuclear war, maintaining global institutions  – have had to consider a back seat to that struggle. That’s why I state our civilization may not survive.  

I became engaged in what I call political philanthropy in the 1980s. That was a time when a large part of the world was under Communist rule, and I desired to help people who were outraged and fought against oppression.  

As the Soviet Union disintegrated, I established 1 foundation after another in rapid succession in what was then the Soviet empire. The effort turned out to be more successful than I expected.  

Those were exciting times. They also coincided with a period of personal financial success that will allowed me to increase our annual giving from $3 million in 1984 in order to more than $300 million 3 years later.  

After the 9/11 attacks within 2001, the tide began to turn against open communities.   Repressive regimes are now in the ascendant and open societies are under duress. Today China and Russia present the greatest threat to spread out society.  

I have pondered long plus hard why that should have happened. I found part of the answer in the rapid development of digital technology, especially artificial intelligence.

In theory, AI ought to be politically neutral: you can use it for good or bad. However in practice the effect is asymmetric. AI is particularly good at producing instruments of control that will help repressive regimes plus endanger open societies.   Covid-19 also helped legitimize instruments of control because they are really useful in dealing with the virus.  

The rapid development of AI went hand in hand with the rise associated with social media and tech platforms. These conglomerates have come in order to dominate the global economy. They are multinational and their achieve extends around the world.

These developments have had far-reaching consequences. They have sharpened the particular conflict between China and the United States. China has converted its tech platforms in to national champions. The United States has been more hesitant because it has worried about their effect on the freedom of the individual.  

These different attitudes shed new light at the conflict between the two different systems of governance that this US and China represent.  

Xi Jinping’s China, which collects personal data for the surveillance and control of its residents more aggressively than some other country in history, ought to take advantage of these developments. But , as I shall explain later tonight, that is not the case.  

Let me now turn to recent developments, Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping met on February 4th  in the opening ceremony of the Beijing Winter Olympics.   These people issued a long statement announcing that the cooperation between them has “ no limits”. Putin informed Xi of a “ special military operation” within Ukraine, but it is not clear whether he told Xi that he had a full-scale assault on Ukraine in mind.   US and UK army experts certainly told their particular Chinese counterparts what was in store. Xi approved, but questioned Putin to wait until the bottom line of the winter Olympics.  

For his part, Xi resolved to keep the Olympics in spite of the particular Omicron variant that was simply beginning to spread in Cina. The organizers went to great lengths to create an airtight bubble for the competitors as well as the Olympics concluded without a problem.

But Omicron established itself in the community, initial in Shanghai, China’s biggest city and commercial centre. Now it is spreading to the rest of the country. Yet Xi continues with his Zero Covid policy. That has inflicted great challenges on Shanghai’s population, simply by forcing them into makeshift quarantine centers instead of letting them quarantine themselves at home. It has driven Shanghai to the verge of open rebellion.  

Many people are puzzled by this seemingly irrational approach, but I can give you the explanation: Xi harbors a guilty secret. This individual never told the Chinese people that they had been inoculated with a vaccine that was designed for the original Wuhan variant and offers very little protection against new variants.  

Xi can’t afford in the future clean because he is at a very delicate moment in his career. His second term in office expires in the drop of 2022 and he wants to be appointed to an unprecedented third term, eventually producing him ruler for life.

He has carefully choreographed a process that would allow him to satisfy his life’s ambition, and everything must be subordinated to this goal.  

In the meantime, Putin’s so-called “ special military operation” failed to unfold according to plan. He expected his army to become welcomed by the Russian speaking population of Ukraine since liberators. His soldiers carried with them their dress outfits for a victory parade. But that is not what happened.  

Ukraine put up suddenly strong resistance and caused severe damage on the invading Russian army. The military was badly equipped and badly led and the soldiers became demoralized. The United States and the European Union rallied to Ukraine’s support and supplied it with armaments. With their assist, Ukraine was able to defeat the particular much larger Russian army in the battle for Kyiv.  

Putin could not afford to accept defeat and changed his plans accordingly. He put General Vladimir  Shamanov,   well known designed for his cruelty in the siege of Grozny, in charge plus ordered him to produce a few success by May 9th  when Victory Day has been to be celebrated.  

But Putin got very little to celebrate.   Shamanov  concentrated his initiatives on the port city of Mariupol which used to have 400, 500 inhabitants. He reduced this to rubble, as he acquired done to Grozny but the Ukrainian defenders held out for 82 days and the siege cost the lives of thousands of civilians.

Moreover, the hasty withdrawal from Kyiv revealed the heinous atrocities that Putin’s army had committed at the civilian population in a suburb of Kyiv, Bucha. They may be well-documented, and they have outraged people who saw the pictures on tv. That did not include the individuals of Russia who had been held in the dark about Putin’s “ special military operation”.

The invasion of Ukraine has now entered a new phase which is much more difficult for the Ukrainian army. They have to fight on open surfaces where the numerical superiority of the Russian army is more difficult to overcome.  

The Ukrainians are doing their best, counterattacking and penetrating Ruskies territory. This has had the added benefit of bringing home towards the Russian population what is really going on.  

The US has also done the best to reduce the financial distance between Russia and Ukraine by getting Congress in order to allocate an unprecedented $40 billion in military and financial aid to  Ukraine. Constantly predict the outcome, but Ukraine certainly has a fighting chance.  

Recently, European leaders went even more. They wanted to use the intrusion of Ukraine to promote higher European integration, so that exactly what Putin is doing can never take place again.  

Enrico Letta, leader of Partito Democratico, proposed a strategy for a partially federated Europe. The federal portion would certainly cover key policy locations.  

Within the federal core, no associate state would have veto strength. In the wider confederation member states could join “ coalitions of the willing” or perhaps retain their veto energy. Mario Draghi endorsed Letta’s plan.

Emmanuel Macron, in a significant broadening of his pro-European method, advocated geographic expansion, as well as the need for the EU to prepare for it. Not only Ukraine but additionally Moldova and the Western Balkans should qualify for membership within the European Union. It will take a long time to exercise the details, but Europe seems to be moving in the right direction.   It has responded to the invasion  of Ukraine with greater speed, unity and energy source than ever before in its history. Following a hesitant start, Commission President, Ursula von der Leyen, also has found a strong pro-European voice.  

But Europe’s dependence on Russian fossil fuels remains excessive, due largely to the mercantilist guidelines pursued by former Chancellor Angela Merkel. She had produced special deals with Russia for that supply of gas and produced China Germany’s largest foreign trade market. That made Australia the best performing economy within Europe but now there is a weighty price to pay. Germany’s economy needs to be reoriented. And that will take a long time.

Olaf Scholz was elected Chancellor because he promised to continue Merkel’s policies. But events pressured him to abandon this promise. That didn’t come easy, because he had to crack with the hallowed traditions from the Social Democrats.  

But when it comes to maintaining European unity, Scholz always seems to do the right part of the end. He abandoned Nordstream 2, committed a 100 billion euros to protection and provided arms in order to Ukraine, breaking with a long-standing taboo. That is how the Western democracies responded to the Ruskies invasion of Ukraine.  

So what do the two dictators Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping have to show for themselves? These are tied together in an alliance that has no limits. They also have a lot in common. They guideline by intimidation, and as a result they make mind-boggling mistakes. Putin expected to be welcomed in Ukraine as a liberator; Xi Jinping is sticking to the Zero Covid policy that will can’t possibly be sustained.  

Putin seems to have recognized that he produced a terrible mistake when this individual invaded Ukraine and he has become preparing the ground for negotiating a cease fire. But the cease fire is unattainable because he cannot be trusted. Putin would have to start peace negotiations which he will never perform because it would be equivalent to resigning.  

The problem is confusing. A army expert who had been opposed to the particular invasion was allowed to embark on Russian television to inform the general public how bad the situation is usually. Later he swore allegiance to Putin. Interestingly, Xi Jinping continues to support Putin, but no longer without limits.  

This begins to explain why Xi Jinping is bound to fail. Offering Putin permission to launch an unsuccessful attack against Ukraine didn’t serve China’s best interests. China ought to be the mature partner in the alliance along with Russia but Xi Jinping’s lack of assertiveness allowed Putin to usurp that place.   But Xi’s worst mistake was to double down on his Absolutely no Covid policy.  

The particular lockdowns had disastrous implications.   They pushed the Chinese economy right into a free fall. It were only available in March, and it will continue to gather momentum until Xi reverses course – which he can never do because he are unable to admit a mistake. Coming on top of the real estate crisis the damage is going to be so great that it will impact the global economy. With the disruption of supply chains, worldwide inflation is liable to turn straight into global depression.

Yet, the less strong Putin gets the more unforeseen he becomes.   The member states from the EU feel the pressure. These people realize that Putin may not wait around until they develop alternative sources of energy but turn off the taps on gas while it really hurts.  

The RePowerEu program announced last week displays these fears. Olaf Scholz is particularly anxious because of the unique deals that his precursor Angela Merkel made with Russian federation. Mario Draghi is more courageous, although Italy’s gas dependency is almost as high as Germany’s. Europe’s cohesion will face a severe test  but if this continues to maintain its unity, it could strengthen both Europe’s power security and leadership on climate.

What about China?   Xi Jinping has many enemies.   Nobody dares in order to attack him directly as they has centralized all the devices of surveillance and clampdown, dominance in his own hands, but it is well known that there is dissention within the Communist Party. It has become so sharp that it offers found expression in content that ordinary people can read.

Contrary to general objectives Xi Jinping may not obtain his coveted third term because of the mistakes he has made. But even if he will, the Politburo may not provide him a free hand to select the members of the next Politburo. That would greatly reduce his energy and influence and make it less likely that he will become leader for life.

As the war rages, the fight against climate change has to get second place. Yet the experts tell us that we have already dropped far behind, and environment change is on the brink of becoming irreversible. That could be the finish of our civilization.  

I find this prospect particularly frightening. The majority of us accept the idea that we must ultimately die but we get it for granted that our civilization will survive.  

Therefore , we must mobilize all our resources to bring the war to an earlier end. The best and perhaps just way to preserve our civilization is to defeat Putin as soon as possible. That’s the bottom line.

Thank you.


Twitter: @WhiteIsTheFury

Gab: @WhiteIsTheFury

Minds: @WhiteIsTheFury

Gettr: @WhiteIsTheFury

BREAKING: Mike Adams Lays Out the Next Phase of Global Collapse and New Lockdowns

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *