Davos Man Is at It Again: The 2022 Annual Meeting of the World Economic Forum

Today, we have “Davos man, ” who is ready to plan your life for you—your wishes notwithstanding

The annual meeting of the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos can be perhaps  the world’s most unpopular conference , and the WEF’s founder plus chairman, Klaus Schwab, one of the world’s most despised figures.

Often compared to “ Dr . Evil , ” the character Mike Meyers performed in the  Austin Powers   series, and routinely likened in order to a  James Bond   supervillain on the internet, Schwab is seen as a messianic megalomaniac leading a nefarious cabal of world leaders plus corporate heads into a future dominated by a globalist top notch.

A Twitter  poll   by TruthBoost asks, “ Does the World Economic Forum make the world a better place? ” As of this writing, 98. 4 percent of respondents said no .

What is it about this confab and its frontrunners that makes the WEF as well as meetings so despised? All things considered, the WEF is “ committed to improving the state of the world, ” or so states its slogan. As it turns out, most people don’t like having a group of unelected, self-appointed dictators issuing top-down decrees and suggesting policies that restrict their particular freedom and infringe their rights.

This particular year’s annual meeting continues to be billed as the most important in its fifty-year history, given the particular war in Ukraine and the postpandemic “ new normal. ” Schwab suggested as much in his  inviting remarks , adding, “ We have to reinforce our resilience against a new virus, possibly, or other risks  which we have on the global agenda ” (8: 30 mark, emphasis mine).

Given that Schwab’s collectivist rhetoric and plans have been so poorly received that he had to write an e book called  The Great Story   to warrant and recast the Great Reset as both necessary and benign, one would think that Schwab might choose his terms more carefully by not suggesting that a “ new virus” or “ various other risks” are part of the “ global agenda” that will “ we” (they) are usually undertaking— as if these were future events being planned. Yet Schwab and the WEF are usually naturals at generating conspiracy theories and conspiracy advocates. (Incidentally, the word “ collective” is used fifty-two times in  The Great Narrative . )

The annual meeting featured solar panel discussions on a number of issues, including  augmented reality ;   main bank digital currencies ;   climate transition in emerging economies ;   crypto’s carbon footprint ;   the digital economy ;   diversity, equity, and inclusion ;   economic sanctions ;   employment in the Fourth Industrial Revolution ;   energy changeover in China ;   environmental, social, and governance (ESG) indexing ;   geopolitics ;   a global tax ;   outbreak healthcare ;   responsible consumption ;   returning nature to cities ; and  Russia , as well a  special address   by the president of Ukraine, Volodymyr Zelenskyy.

The range of topics is staggering but also a sign of the hubristic central planning ethos of the WEF. Through centralized digital currencies in order to urban planning, the WEF’s concerns are reminiscent of plus likely have been  influenced by the Club of Rome   and they are replete with its  neo-Malthusianism . It seems that absolutely nothing is that the WEF does not claim to be expert in and nothing that it will not issue recommendations on. Yet mainstream mass media still deems the WEF’s Great Reset a conspiracy theory, despite Joe Biden’s  recent remark   that high gas prices are something to become celebrated as part of “ an amazing transition” to renewables. Quite simply, high gas prices have always been part of Green New Deal planning, and the Biden politburo admittedly has been party to their own rise.

The highlight of the 2022 meeting included Australian eSafety commissioner Julie Inman Grant  saying   during a panel titled Ushering inside a Safer Digital Future that “ freedom of talk is not the same thing as a totally free for all, ” and that “ we are going to need a recalibration of a whole range of human legal rights that are playing out online— from freedom of presentation, to, you know, to be free from online violence. ”

These ominous responses come on the heels associated with Australia’s slide toward totalitarianism during the pandemic and the Western Union’s recent approval of the  Digital Solutions Act , which bans “ hate speech” plus “ disinformation” and represents a major step toward one-world governance of the internet. In particular, the EU framework pertaining to digital communications will regulate speech regarding “ climate change, ” health problems like the coronavirus and other “ pandemics, ” and “ hate speech” or other “ illegal speech” because defined by the EU.   To meet the EU’s regulatory requirements and to streamline their efforts, search sites and social media platforms most likely only will apply one set of guidelines, the EU’s, to all on-line content.

In short, whether the WEF and its individuals are feckless central planners and globalists or, furthermore likely, powerful influencers impacting everything from government policies to corporate decision-making, this group has the temerity to claim that they are or should be in charge of the world. Never mind making people alone to pursue their life interests, including their economic and family lives. These master organizers must intervene against all of the individual, local, regional, and national plans. As Ludwig von Mises noted, this kind of central planners are always authoritarians who wish to overwrite the plans of individuals. They believe that these are indubitably right, despite the terrible track record of interventionism.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *