I want to stress a very important point first and foremost, because I don’t think the political left and the typical gun grabber understands the particular gravity of the situation and so they need to be educated:
Liberty advocates can never give up their guns. It will not happen. We have drawn a line in the sand with regards to the 2 nd Amendment and we are not going to move, not even an inch. It does not matter what legislation or executive orders Joe Biden promotes, and it does not matter if there are future criminal events involving firearms. There is no situation in which we are going to hand over the ability to defend ourselves and rely on the government alone. All of the indignant wailing and preaching from anti-gun leftists is perfect for naught; they will get absolutely nothing.
Gun rights are integral to a free society because they act as the deterrent to potential authorities over-reach and authoritarianism. Tyrants might infiate politics and take over governments, and they may even THINK they have the ability to oppress the public, but they will never end up being quite sure they can escape with it as long as the public has the means to “ reach out and touch them” from a distance. They will always have doubts and this is vital for freedom – When tyrants have uncertainties, liberty prevails.
I covered the issue of inbound gun bans in the latest issue of my newsletter, The Crazy Bunch Dispatch , yet I wanted to examine here the particular wider implications of disarmament; including what the consequences will be if we were to comply, and exactly what the establishment should concern when most of us don’t.
You will find said for many years now that I am certain that anti-gun interests WILL try to disarm the American people before 2030, simply because they must. They cannot achieve the implementation of the “ Great Reset” or the “ ” new world ” Order” (their terminology using their own mouths) without initial taking away our ability to fight back. They know that if they usually do not disarm Americans they will eventually fail. It’s really that easy to understand; if we keep our guns we will win. If we let our guns be taken, we are going to lose.
One thing must be made abundantly crystal clear in this debate: Gun offences are irrelevant to weapon rights. They do not matter in terms of the constitution, nor should they issue. Our rights supersede the opportunity of abuse by bad people, and they supersede the whims of government.
The political left seems to think that gun crime is that matters. They obsess over every single tragedy not really because they actually care about the particular victims or the families involved, but because they assume that every gun crime is a type of currency that they can use to buy the eventual purchase of the 2 nd Amendment. They think they can buy the option to erase our gun rights utilizing the lives of shooting victims as a trade.
I’m sorry I have to inform them, but that’s not how it works. That’s not how it will EVER function. And if they think they could force the issue, then you will find millions of us in the liberty movement that will teach them a painful lesson in humbleness. There will come a day when they’ll wish they had been more modest and not turned to authoritarianism.
In the meantime, they will attempt every trick in the book in order to con the public into thinking that incremental measures or executive orders are needed as a means to save lives. They won’t save lifestyles, they’ll only lead to the disarmament of the population, making it easier to subjugate us and eliminate resistance. The key to understanding gun control laws and regulations is to accept the reality that gun grabbers have NO INTENTION of staying satisfied with “ typical sense” gun control; they are going to only be satisfied with gun confiscation. This is why no quarter could be given to them. No compromises. No diplomacy. Nothing.
It’s important to clarify exactly where gun rights advocates are coming from, because leftists don’t get it. They are perfectly prepared to give up their freedoms in return for false security. Allow me to put it this way:
History shows us that disarmament of any people or subset of a human population is eventually followed by the oppression and often genocide of that same population. Statistically, disarmament has led to some of the worst mass murders in the good humanity. We risk dropping far more lives by giving upward our guns than all of us risk by keeping our guns.
By extension, a common argument among gun grabbers is that various other western nations have intensive gun restrictions and they you do not have tyranny. I beg in order to differ. As we recently witnessed with the covid mandates and the attempted vaccine passports, a lot of governments from the EU in order to Australia and New Zealand took the mask away (pun intended) and demonstrated their true totalitarian colors to the point that they even created covid camps where people were locked up without due procedure.
I would argue that had it not already been for the growing opposition amongst conservatives in the US and in parts of Canada, the covid requirement agenda would still be energetic today and most of our freedoms would be erased. The opposition in the US is the reason why medical tyranny was scrapped through most of the world. For if we could be free despite the existence associated with covid, then so may everyone else.
And how were conservatives able to beat the mandates? Ultimately, it is because we have guns.
But what about the fatalities of children in Uvalde plus elsewhere? Don’t they matter? Of course they do, and every pro-gun person out there agrees. What we don’t agree on is the concept that government should have a monopoly on security and on pressure. When government has a monopoly on force, millions of people perish instead of dozens.
In reality, the events within Uvalde prove once again that defenders of the 2 nd Modification are right. Reports in the scene of the shooting now indicate that will police actually failed to cease the shooter (Salvador Ramos) from entering Robb Primary School and they were ordered to stay outside and do absolutely nothing as the shooter moved freely for over an hour. Ramos was finally stopped by a single Border Patrol agent which went in on his own.
Adding insult to injury, police used drive to prevent parents and community members from going in plus doing the job they refused to do. I want to point out that the undeniable fact that the police were “ ordered” to stay out and keep individuals out is no excuse – Some orders should be disregarded and if you don’t ignore them then you are partly responsible for the consequences.
I suggest that two simple solutions could have saved lives in Uvalde without erasing our constitutional rights.
1st, if public schools removed their “ gun free zone” status and allowed teachers to conceal have, then Ramos likely might have been dead before harming a single child. Or, he’d have at least faced opposition and been cornered.
Second, if local community militias still existed in the US as the Constitution demands, then parents could have organized a much faster response and strolled right over any police that refused to go in and do what needed to be carried out. Parents are allowed to risk their particular lives for their children, and anyone that says otherwise ought to be ignored or trampled.
The answer to crime of all kinds (not just crimes that involve guns) is more community involvement plus a visible armed presence. We need more people to be equipped and more individual responsibility for the security of those that cannot defend themselves.
A gun ban will not guard us from crime, this only encourages tyranny. Additionally, it doesn’t matter because annoying that Biden or the political left can do to take the guns anyway. Other options need to be tried, and there exists a reason why gun grabbers refuse to acknowledge any alternatives – Because they don’t care about safeguarding the innocent, they only care about eliminating a portion of the constitution that has long avoided them from gaining good luck.
I’ve stated it before and Items say it again, more encroachments on the 2nd Modification will lead to war. Leftists might welcome this within the assumption that they have the government as well as the military on their side. They may not realize that many in the military are also gun rights supporters. They also might have overlooked the results of asymmetric wars in places like Afghanistan, and frankly, many Us citizens have far better gear and far better training than the Taliban. This will not end nicely for anti-gun authoritarians.
If you would like to support the work that Alt-Market does while also receiving content on advanced tactics for defeating the globalist agenda, subscribe to our unique newsletter The Wild Bunch Dispatch. Learn more about it HERE .