The Death of the Ministry associated with Truth — What Will They actually Next?

All warfare is based on deception, and we are currently with war. This is why we’re constantly being bombarded with the concept that truth tellers are resting, and that liars are telling the truth


  • April 6 through April 8, 2022, the University of Chicago’s Institute of Politics and The Atlantic magazine cohosted the conference titled “ Disinformation and the Erosion of Democracy. ” The event revealed mainstream media is so beholden in order to Washington Democrats, they’re incapable of reporting the news
  • UC freshman Christopher Phillips, a writer for the University of Chicago’s paper, the Chi town Thinker, confronted CNN about several instances where the wall socket pushed proven hoaxes, misinformation and disinformation
  • The Atlantic editor-in-chief charged student reporters who requested probing questions of waging a “ disinformation campaign” at the conference
  • All warfare is based on deceptiveness, and we are currently at war. This is why we’re constantly being bombarded with the idea that reality tellers are lying, which liars are telling the facts
  • The Biden administration’s “ Ministry of Truth” has, for the time being, already been put on hold, and its chief, Nina Jankowicz, has resigned

April 6 through Apr 8, 2022, the University of Chicago’s Institute of Politics and The Atlantic mag cohosted a conference titled “ Disinformation and the Erosion of Democracy. ” 1

The three-day occasion explored “ the structured spread of disinformation plus strategies to respond to it. ” Speakers included former Chief executive Barack Obama, columnist Jonah Goldberg, Marxist history professional Anne Elizabeth Applebaum plus CNN anchor Brian Stelter, just to name a few.

But , as noted by Fox News point Tucker Carlson (video above), what they didn’t count on was the fact that not everyone has been brainwashed into oblivion. Several college students still have mental performance operating at full quickness. During one Q & A session, UC freshman Christopher Phillips, a writer for the University or college of Chicago’s paper, the particular Chicago Thinker, 2   asked the following question:

“ You’ve all of spoken extensively about Fox News being a purveyor associated with disinformation, but CNN is correct up there with them. They pushed the Russian collusion hoax, they pushed the Jussie Smollett hoax, these people smeared Justice Kavanagh as being a rapist, and they also smeared Chip Sandman as a white supremacist.

And indeed, they dismissed the Hunter Biden laptop as 100 % pure Russian disinformation. The mistakes of the mainstream media, plus CNN in particular, seem to magically all go in one direction. Are we expected to think that this is all just some sort of random coincidence, or is there something else behind it? ”

CNN — An Unchanging Chronic Offender

Stelter responded, “ I believe you’re describing a different approach than the one that I view. But I understand that that is a popular right-wing narrative regarding CNN. ” So , very first, he rejected the premise of the question in the first place, and then this individual discredited Phillips for asking the question.

04 8, 2022, Phillips appeared on Carlson’s show to discuss what prompted him in order to confront these self-proclaimed experts on disinformation. He pointed out that the conference was filled with legacy media personalities who have spent their entire professions spreading disinformation, and now could possibly be supposed to teach us regarding and protect us from disinformation?

Phillips said that while he did not expect Stelter to “ hand over the keys” to CNN and admit these kinds of are corrupt, he was expecting he’d admit that mistakes had been made and modifications had been issued. Alas, none of that happened. There was no remorse. No apology. Simply no retractions.

Rather, Stelter gave a rambling non-answer defense that produced little sense to anyone, basically proving CNN has no intention to live up to journalistic standards and expectations. Applebaum’s response to a question about the Hunter Biden laptop was maybe even worse (below).

All Warfare Is Based on Deception

At this point, it must be clear to everyone that we are at war, albeit undeclared, and as noted by Sunlight Tzu in “ The ability of War, ” all combat is based on deception. This is why jooxie is constantly being bombarded with all the idea that truth tellers are usually lying, and that liars are telling the truth.

We’re living in an inverted reality, where up will be down and left is right. Deception is the hallmark of the day, and the reason we’re bombarded with deception is because it is really an information war. Instead of shooting missiles at our heads, the attackers are shooting missives into our brains.

But the objective is the same as in any other war. The attacker always assaults with the intent of getting something, and in this situation, the technocratic transhumanist cabal hell-bent on world domination is intent on all of us surrendering to their ambitions.

Biden Administration’s Ministry of Truth

In late April 2022, we all discovered that the U. H. Department of Homeland Safety (DHS) had quietly, behind the scenes, created a Disinformation Governance Board. 3, 4   The particular backlash was immediate. The particular Orwellian connotations were just so blatant, few could dismiss them.

The woman chosen to lead this particular Ministry of Truth was Nina Jankowicz, 5   a “ Russian disinformation expert” most widely known for tweeting out right now well-recognized lies and performing made-up show tunes regarding disinformation and erotic Harry Potter songs 6   on TikTok.

In one example, she claimed the Hunter Biden laptop story was “ a Trump campaign product, ” 7   even though will be certainly not a shred of evidence to back up that declare. In another, she cleaned it off as a “ fairytale, ” 8   even though there exists plenty of evidence confirming its authenticity.

Jankowicz has also publicly opposed the very first Amendment of the U. S i9000. Constitution, saying free conversation is bad for “ marginalized communities. ” Yet in the next breath, she insisted that “ protecting free speech, privacy, civil rights and civil liberties” would be “ a HUGE focus” of the new disinformation board. nine

How can you protect free speech plus simultaneously combat it? Keep in mind that make sense, but then again, it’s not intended to make sense. People are more suggestible when confused, and irreconcilable double-speak is definitely confusing.

‘ Anti-Disinformation Expert’ = Propagandist

Independent journalist Glen Greenwald highlighted Jankowicz’s obvious insufficient real credentials in a Might 4, 2022, Substack article, noting that: ten

“ The concept of ‘ anti-disinformation expert’ is alone completely fraudulent. This is not a real expertise but rather a concocted title bestowed on propagandists to make them appear a lot more scholarly and apolitical compared to they are …

There is no conceivable circumstance where a domestic law enforcement agency like DHS should be claiming the power to decree truth and falsity … The purpose of Homeland Security agents is to propagandize and deceive, not enlighten and inform.

The level of historical ignorance plus stupidity required to believe that Oughout. S. Security State agents are earnestly devoted to revealing and decreeing truth is off the charts … That no one should want the U. S. Government let alone Homeland Security arrogating unto alone the power to declare truth and falsity seems self-evident. ”

Ministry of Truth Hits a Roadblock

Fortunately, the public mockery turned out to be too great to deal with, so the Ministry of Reality has, for the time being, been put on hold, 11   and Jankowicz has resigned. According to a DHS spokesperson: 12

“ The Board’s purpose has been grossly and intentionally mischaracterized: it was never about censorship or policing conversation in any manner … As the executive director, Nina Jankowicz was subjected to unjustified plus vile personal attacks and physical threats … ”

Threats against Jankowicz aside, the Board’s purpose was hardly mischaracterized, and clearly about censorship and policing speech on behalf of the government, within clear violation of the Cosmetic. The very title of the plank clearly informs us it turned out about the governance of disinformation.

“ Governance” is defined as “ the react or process of governing or overseeing the control and direction of something. ” Synonyms include “ expert, jurisdiction, regime” and “ rule. ” 13   So , “ Disinformation Governance” clearly means the board was meant to have the jurisdiction to guideline over information deemed to become false.

Jankowicz has even asserted that “ trustworthy, verified individuals, ” such as herself, must have the authority to edit other people’s tweets and social media posts! 14   “ Verified individuals can essentially start to modify Twitter the same sort of way that Wikipedia is, to allow them to add context to specific tweets, ” she mentioned. How is that not censorship? How s that not policing speech?

Define ‘ Governance’

Properly determining words and using them correctly have never been more important, mainly because in many respects, the very sanity of our society hinges on it. Every day, it seems, the enemy is trying to redefine or muddle the definition of phrases that have very clear and particular meanings, because without apparent definitions, we cannot possess a rational conversation, and without logical conversation, they win.

A 1981 quote widely attributed to former CIA director William Casey that seems well worth reiterating here was, “ We’ll understand our disinformation program will be complete when everything the particular American public believes will be false. ” fifteen

Although some doubt Casey ever stated this, Barbara Honegger, who at the time was the assistant towards the chief domestic policy agent to President Ronald Reagan, has publicly confirmed the girl was present when he or she said it. According to Honegger, Reagan asked Casey what his goal was because director of the CIA, which was his reply.

While the CIA, in 1981, was neck deep in a plot to destruction the government in Libya, that same year, an investigative reporter named Jack Anderson also revealed the CIA was waging a disinformation war against the American public. According to Anderson, Casey contended for the government’s “ directly to mislead the public by sowing phony stories in the push. ” But as Jones Jefferson noted, “ the people’s right to know much more important than the officials’ right to govern. ”

Casey was supposedly a patriot who saw laying as a means to gain the public’s support for political, economic and military measures. One could argue that little harm had been done to the American open public in the process, aside from breeding ignorance about geopolitical truths. The lies we’re being fed today, however , are in some cases a threat to life, and they’re most definitely a direct threat to liberty.

Liberal Obsession With Disinformation Will be Backfiring

In a May 20, 2022 Intelligencer article, Sam Adler-Bell records: 16

“ According to [Washington Post’s Taylor] Lorenz and her resources … Jankowicz was taken down ‘ by the very factors she dedicated her career to combating’ … To put it differently, the Disinformation Governance Panel was undone by a ‘ textbook disinformation campaign. ‘

This version of the story is abundantly ironic and tragic … [F]rom one more perspective, the right’s campaign against the Disinformation Board resembled any other successful advocacy effort to halt a government initiative …

I actually don’t see how a fully operational Disinformation Governance Board could have prevented this outcome — except via the very indicates conservatives (mistakenly? ) feared it would possess.

If, as Lorenz is certainly careful to note, ‘ nor the board nor Jankowicz had any power or even ability to declare what is correct or false, or force Internet providers, social media systems or public schools to take action against certain types of talk, ‘ then how would it not have prevented right-wingers through tweeting terrible, dishonest things about Jankowicz? …

[T]he some other pernicious problem with liberals’ fixation on ‘ disinformation’ is that it allows them to lie to themselves. Trump’s ascendance in 2016 posed a painful clairvoyant challenge to liberal elites.

It recommended the possibility that many millions of Us citizens were motivated by strong, venomous dissatisfactions with the globe they had helped create, which our cultural disagreements were outstanding, not superficial, and that our perspectives were practically irreconcilable inversions of each other …

‘ Disinformation’ was the liberal Establishment’s distressing reaction to the psychic injury of 2016. It provided an answer that evaded problem altogether, protecting them in the agony of self-reflection …

Like other pathological reactions to trauma, the disinformation neurosis tended to re-create the conditions that produced the affliction in the first place. ”

Bell goes on to discuss the University associated with Chicago’s Disinformation and the Erosion of Democracy conference, observing that “ gathering the best lights of liberalism for an auditorium at the University of Chicago — so that they with each other can decide which information holds true and safe to be consumed with the rabble outside — attacks me as a hollow exercise in self-soothing, more likely to aggravate the symptoms of our legitimacy crisis (distrust and cynicism) compared to resolve any of its impasses. ”

Indeed, Stelter’s response to Phillips’ question about CNN’s disinformation report does nothing to improve trust in the mainstream media. What’s more, I believe most people instinctively feeling that there’s something really fishy about the mis- and disinformation mania. As noted simply by Joseph Bernstein in his September 2021 article, seventeen   “ Bad News: Selling the Story associated with Disinformation”:

“ A quick scan of the institutions that submit most frequently and influentially regarding disinformation: Harvard University, the brand new York Times, Stanford University, MIT, NBC, the Atlantic Council, the Council on Foreign Relations, etc .

That the most prestigious liberal institutions of the pre-digital age are the most committed to fighting disinformation reveals a great deal about what they stand to shed, or hope to regain … However well-intentioned these professionals are, they don’t have exclusive access to the fabric of reality. ”

I think that explains why people intuitively don’t trust those who resort to screaming about “ disinformation” at every turn. Globally, people understand that no one person, and certainly no government company, has unfettered “ unique access to the fabric of reality, ” as Fossiles harz puts it.

The particular Privatization of Censorship

Government officials realize that while they long for overall information control, censorship is really a bad look. This, I believe, is why the Biden administration pulled the plug around the Ministry of Truth. It wasn’t that the Disinformation Governance Board was being mischaracterized and unjustly opposed.

It was that too many people comprehended that the board was about unconstitutional government-sanctioned censorship. That popular understanding has brought bad PAGE RANK on top of already record-low reputation. That doesn’t mean the censorship effort won’t continue, however. So far, they’ve been exceptionally effective at outsourcing the censorship to private companies. Taking direct ownership of it with a government-run board was simply too big a step at this time.

So , without doubt, we can expect Facebook, Twitter and the rest to continue censoring on government’s behalf, until or unless the U. S. judicial branch proves it’s not completely corrupt and does something about this. For the time being, we may have to turn to other venues for that type of justice.

Truth Checker on the Run

According to independent journalist Paul Thacker, 18   Emmanuel Vincent, chief executive of Science Feedback, a Facebook fact checking support, has been ordered to appear in court to answer with regard to it’s deceptive fact check out claims, and is now away from home.

In one so-called “ fact check, ” Science Feedback slapped a misinformation label on an essay by Johns Hopkins physician-researcher Marty Makary, in which this individual predicted that COVID-19 küchenherd immunity was imminent. Because noted by Thacker: 19

“ Below is the thing, you don’t need a Ph level. D. in epidemiology to comprehend that when experts analyze studies and make predictions they may be wrong. Duh. Predictions are opinions, not facts.

And while there’s nothing incorrect with Science Feedback posting a contrary prediction, marking their own opinion a ‘ fact’ just proves they fail at logic.

This inability to understand the difference between opinion and fact has made Science Opinions the butt of on-line scorn, but what got Vincent in a police train station and sent him fleeing from justice … will be colluding with Facebook as well as the federal government to deny people their First Amendment legal rights.

All whilst pretending to be an ‘ indie fact check’ … [T]he charge alone has sent Vincent running from address to address, throughout Paris. ”

Vincent evidently has been served multiple times, but has refused to indication for any of the documents, declaring it’s really a company called SciVerify, a Science Feedback subsidiary, that works in partnership with Facebook, not Science Feedback itself. What is he hiding from?

In short, he’s frantically trying to “ avoid general public accountability before a judicial system that is not (yet) rigged by Facebook, ” Thacker writes. We now know Fb and its outsourced fact checkers are colluding behind the scenes in order to censor on behalf of the government, 20   and that is blatantly unlawful.

The Erosion of Democracy Is Real

Getting back to where we started, with the University of Chicago disinformation conference, one of the greatest revelations from it was that the mainstream media is so beholden to Washington Democrats, most are incapable of reporting the news.

The Atlantic editor-in-chief even accused Phillips and other student reporters who questioned probing questions of waging a “ disinformation campaign” at the conference! 21   That’s how vulnerable they are, and how one-note their defense. They really have no defense when faced with truth, so they yell “ Disinformation! ” As documented by American Thinker: 22

“ It is important to understand that when liberals make use of words such as bias, partisanship, disinformation, distortions, and rewrite, they are exclusively directed at right-leaning media.

Notable members of conservative mass media such as Sean Hannity and Tucker Carlson and the past due Rush Limbaugh have adjectives such as ‘ right-wing’ … prefixed to their names. These are even called propagandists. However , the likes of Rachel Maddow and Anderson Cooper are called media; no adjectives are used.

Fox News will be called a right-wing news network, whereas MSNBC or CNN is merely known as a news outlet. For those who who wishes to study liberal echo chambers, the Disinformation Conference is the ideal forum.

There was not even a pretense to conceal biases … The views indicated are not similar, but identical. Their sanctimony has caused such levels of delusions they think of themselves as the singular custodians of facts, truths, and taste …

The forum as well as the utterances from Stelter plus Applebaum prove what very conservative have known for a long [time]: the mainstream mass media are the propaganda wing from the Democrat party.

There are adept wordsmiths plus disinformation strategists within the Democrat leadership who provides the press with buzzwords and talking points for the day which they thoroughly follow. This explains the reason why they have identical views and use identical words …

The Disinformation Conference demonstrates that there never will be any course modification simply because the propagandists usually do not think they have erred by any means. This truly is an chafing of democracy. ”

–   Sources plus References

Court Case Exposes Biden’s Fascist Ministry of Truth

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *