In the latest example of technology and health being overruled by woke nonsense, experts on obesity have required ‘ hurtful’ terms such as ‘ morbidly obese’ to become scrapped so as not to damage the feelings of fat people.
The Daily Mail reports that scientists published in the journal Unhealthy weight, which describes itself as ‘ the premier supply of information for people with obesity’, conducted a study on how often ‘ negative terminology’ was used in connection with obesity.
In an analysis of thousands of papers, the researchers found that 16. 8% used the term ‘ morbid’, while 2 . 4% contained the word ‘ fail’.
The researchers then asked a selection of fat individuals how they felt about that, and to no one’s surprise someone said it hurt their feelings and made them weep.
One participant described the use of the word ‘ morbid’ in connection with obesity as ‘ chilling’, while others recommended that using ‘ failure’ denotes that a lack of self control is to blame meant for obesity.
Huh? In the vast majority of situations it is.
The upshot of the study is that health professionals should watch their own language around sensitive fatties.
It concluded that rather than using ‘ morbidly obese’ they should say ‘ significantly obese’, and instead of ‘ weight loss or diet failure’ they should say ‘ ineffective/insufficient weight loss’ or ‘ secondary weight regain’.
Prospect author Richard Welbourn, a bariatric surgeon working on Somerset’s Musgrove Park Medical center, said “ All healthcare professionals should be aware of this research and consider their utilization of language when talking about obesity with colleagues and sufferers. ”
Welbourn added that “ Non-judgemental, standardised terminology may help sufferers feel safe to engage inside a conversation about weight and potential treatment options. ”
Commenting on the research, Joe Nadglowski, president of the Obesity Action Coalition declared that “ It’s time we prioritise better language around obesity, ” including “ Poor or outdated language hurts the provider/patient relationship and ultimately continues people with obesity from looking for or receiving care. ”
Nadglowski furthermore suggested that “ stays and stones may break my bones but words will never hurt me” would not apply to obese people.
Critics reacted to the study by observing that ‘ morbidly obese’ is a clinical term which sugar coating (not literally) obesity is dangerous.
Christopher Snowdon, from the Institute of Economic Matters thinktank noted that “ It is called morbid being overweight because a BMI of over 35 is associated with a greater risk of death, as opposed to being overweight and mildly obese. ”
Snowdon added, “ It is not crystal clear why an organisation the Obesity Society, writing in the journal called Obesity, considers people will be unnecessarily troubled by being described as morbidly obese, but are happy to become called obese. ”
“ Perhaps we ought to just go back to calling people fat? ” he suggested.
Two thirds of the people in both Britain and the U. S. are overweight plus obesity is imminently started surpass smoking as the greatest cause of cancer.
The strain on healthcare in both countries because of obesity is clear.
But for the lord’s sake don’t hurt their own feelings.
To the UK National Health Service’s website the words ‘ morbidly’ or ‘ morbid’ have been almost entirely scrubbed through guidance on obesity, replaced along with descriptions like a BMI over 40 being ‘ seriously obese’.
As we reported yesterday, the NHS has also changed its guidance pages on ovarian cancer, removing instances of the word “ women” within a move that they say will likely be more “ inclusive” towards trans, non-binary and intersex people.
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
ALERT! In the age of bulk Silicon Valley censorship It is vital that we stay in touch.
We need you to sign up for our free e-zine here .
Assistance our sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown.
Also, we urgently need your financial support here . — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —