August 9, 2022

Up-date: United Nations Touted ‘Benefits of World Hunger’ — Today Contrived Food Shortages Threaten Civilization

“Hungry people are the most productive individuals, especially where there is a requirement for manual labour, ” creates political science professor George Kent.

Revise 2: 00 PM CST: The United Nations has clean its 2009 op-ed “ The Benefits of World Hunger” moments after this article was published.

The United Nations Share has not yet responded to Infowars’ request for comment as of this writing.

An aged version is available in the original story below:

Decades before global food disadvantages have emerged as a result of globalist “ green” policies, the Ukraine conflict, and a series of food plant disasters, an op-ed in the United Nations Explain touted the “ advantages of world hunger. ”

The 2009 op-ed titled, “ The advantages of World Hunger , ” claims that contrary to the particular “ naï ve view” that widespread hunger is in fact bad for humanity, it actually has “ great positive value” to workers plus their employers.

“ We sometimes discuss hunger in the world as if this were a scourge that all of us want to see abolished, seeing it as comparable with the plague or aids. Yet that naï ve view prevents us from coming to grips with what causes and sustains hunger. Hunger has great positive value to a lot of people, ” wrote professor George Kent of the College of Hawaii.

“ Certainly, it is fundamental to the functioning of the world’s economy. Hungry people are the most productive people, especially where there is a need for manual labour. ”

Kent goes on to say that with no “ threat of craving for food, ” the global economy would certainly cease to exist.

“ How many of us would sell our services if it were not for the threat of craving for food? More importantly, how many of us would sell our services therefore cheaply if it were not for your threat of hunger? ” Kent wrote. “ Whenever we sell our services cheaply, we enrich others, people who own the factories, the machines and the lands, and ultimately own the people who work for all of them. For those who depend on the availability of inexpensive labour, hunger is the foundation of their wealth. ”

“ No one works harder than hungry individuals. Yes, people who are well nourished have greater capacity for successful physical activity, but well-nourished individuals are far less willing to do that work, ” he added.

If that was not psychotic enough, Kent point-blank admitted that the elites really view food scarcity as an “ asset, ” declaring that efforts to end worldwide hunger “ would be a disaster. ”

“ For those of us at the luxury of the social ladder, closing hunger globally would be a tragedy. If there were no food cravings in the world, who would plow the fields? Who would harvest the vegetables? Who would work in the particular rendering plants? Who would clean our toilets? We would need to produce our own food and thoroughly clean our own toilets. No wonder people at the high end are not hurrying to solve the hunger problem. For many of us, hunger is not a problem, but an asset. ”

There you might have it: the global power framework must actually be pleased to view the emergence of food shortages as a result of a suspicious spate of foods distribution plant disasters , “ green” initiatives , regional conflict , supply chain malfunctions , and rampant inflation .

Prepare accordingly.

Twitter: @WhiteIsTheFury

Truth Social: @WhiteIsTheFury

Gettr: @WhiteIsTheFury

Gab: @WhiteIsTheFury

Thoughts: @WhiteIsTheFury

Foods Wars Have Begun

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *