August 18, 2022

Nederlander Farmers Rise Up Against Foods System ‘Reset’

The decision in order to decimate cattle farming in the name of environmental protection rings hollowed out in the face of looming food disadvantages and potential famine worldwide.

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

  • Holland intends to halve its nitrogen and ammonia air pollution by 2030. To reach that will goal, the Finance plus Agriculture Ministry now would like to reduce the number of livestock by 30%. As a result, many farmers will be driven out of company. As with current energy shortages, the resulting reductions in farming are said to be a good “ unavoidable” part of the Green Agenda to improve air, soil and water quality
  • Cattle are given nitrogen in the form of crude protein. While protein is an important nutrient for cows, nitrogen is not efficiently broken down simply by cattle, so a lot of it really is excreted in the urine plus feces as urea. When urine and feces get mixed together, the urea is converted into ammonia
  • Since the amount of ammonia produced is related to the crude protein the animals are fed, one suggested method to lower the ammonia is to reduce the amount of crude protein in the animals’ diet. A potential problem with that idea is that cattle have protein specifications just like humans do. If they don’t cut crude proteins, they’ll have to downsize their own herds, and if smaller herds aren’t financially feasible, might have to shut down altogether
  • The decision to decimate cattle farming in the name of environmental protection rings hollow in the face of looming food shortages and potential famine worldwide. It appears they’re intentionally trying to create meat so scarce plus expensive that regular people still cannot afford it. They can after that introduce synthetic meat options and insect protein, each of which are part of The Great Reset’s food plan
  • While the notion of a pollution-free world is an attractive 1, ultimately, the Green Agenda isn’t about the environment — it’s about creating a manage system in which the world’s assets are owned by the richest of the rich, while the remaining population is controlled through the allocation of those resources, such as the allocation of foods

The Netherlands is currently in an uproar on the government’s decision to reduce the amount of livestock by 30% in an effort to halve its nitrogen plus ammonia pollution by 2030. 1   As a result of this “ green” policy, many farmers will be driven out of business. 2   As with current energy shortages, the particular resulting reductions in farming are said to be an “ unavoidable” part of the Green Agenda to improve air, soil plus water quality. a few

The Dutch government has actually appointed a new Minister associated with Nature and Nitrogen in order to oversee the climate goals. 4   Provincial authorities now have 12 months to work out how they’re going to meet the emission reduction targets.

In a public declaration about the new emissions targets, the Dutch government accepted that “ The sincere message … is that not every farmers can continue their particular business. ” five   Those who do continue will have to come up with creative solutions to meet the new emissions restrictions.

Just how do Cows Contribute to Nitrogen plus Ammonia Pollution?

Cattle are fed nitrogen in the form of crude protein. Whilst protein is an essential nutritional for cows, nitrogen is just not efficiently broken down by cattle, so a lot of it is excreted in the urine and waste as urea. When pee and feces get combined together, the urea can be converted into ammonia. 6, 7

Since the amount of ammonia produced is related to the crude proteins the animals are fed, one suggested way to reduced the ammonia is to reduce the amount of crude protein within the animals’ diet. (Other factors such as season also effect ammonia production, but farmers have no control over that. )

A potential problem with that idea is that cattle have protein requirements exactly like humans do. It’s particularly crucial for healthy development, muscle growth and lactation. As noted in a yr paper 8   by Jane Parish, a beef cattle professional in Mississippi, “ Delivering adequate protein in meat cattle diets is important pertaining to animal health and productivity as well as ranch profitability. ”

Responsible farmers give their cattle just the right amount, so cutting crude proteins could impact both the animals’ health and farm productivity. If they don’t cut crude protein, they’ll have to downsize their particular herds, and if smaller herds aren’t financially feasible, they will have to shut down altogether. Obviously, many are outraged, as skyrocketing fertilizer and feed costs have already cut profits just for farmers and raised prices for consumers.

Curious Timing

As noted in a This summer 1, 2022, report simply by Peter Imanuelsen, an independent journalist in Sweden, the timing of this brazen attack upon cattle farmers is a interested one, and one that can only really be explained as an deliberate strategy to force us to the Great Reset by production a food crisis: 9

“ We are going to likely see even more expensive food next year, and however probably famines in some areas of the world. So , what do the particular genius politicians in Europe do? They want to shut down facilities because of climate change obviously! That will surely help! The particular cows are farting too much!

That’s not a tale by the way. In New Zealand, they want to implement a tax on cow farts plus burps! I really don’t get this. We are facing a food crisis and they want to shut down farms in the name of climate alter? I guess they really want you to eat the bugs and be happy. They are working on making meat so expensive the common people won’t be able to afford it. Are you enjoying The Great Reset? ”

In response to the new nitrogen and ammonia limitations, an estimated 40, 000 Nederlander farmers have gathered in protest, arguing the assault on farming is irrational and unfair, as other industries responsible for far greater amounts of pollution — such as transport, construction and aviation — aren’t facing the same limitations.

They’ve clogged a number of highways with tractors and even sprayed manure on the town hall in Lochem. 10   Nearby police have reportedly replied by shooting at some from the farmers. Jimmy Dore evaluations the situation in the video over.

What’s Wrong With Nitrogen?

As explained by And so are News, 11   nitrogen makes up about 78% of the earth’s atmosphere and it is essential for life. However , in excess, and in the wrong areas, it may damage the ecosystem. Nitrogen runoff from concentrated pet feeding operations (CAFOs) and farms using synthetic pesticides and fertilizers can leach into and contaminate drinking water supplies.

Nitrogen runoff can also cause algae blooms when it enters lakes or oceans. This depletes the water of oxygen and creates dead zones where no aquatic life can be sustained. This is why I’ve lengthy advocated against CAFOs plus conventional industrial farms that will rely on chemicals to grow food.

That doesn’t indicate livestock are a blight around the eco system, however. Quite the contrary. Livestock raised in accordance with regenerative agriculture concepts will heal and enormously improve soil quality and help stabilize the weather. So , it’s not cows per se that are the problem. It’s the industrialization of cattle ranching that triggers it to have a negative impact. The answer, then, is not to get rid of meat production. The answer is to transition into a regenerative program.

Since the changeover can take a few years, during which revenue may be marginal or absent, many farmers hesitate to consider this step on their own. Government could facilitate the transition simply by subsidizing farmers that make the switch, but none have got opted to do so. Why? Could it be because regenerative farming may be the converse of what The Excellent Reset is all about?

Dutch Climate Rules Can Cut Meat Availability Across EU

Within 2019, the highest administrative court in The Netherlands, the Council of State, ruled the particular Dutch government was in breach of European Union law that will called for stark cuts within nitrogen emissions. twelve

Following that ruling, some 18, 000 infrastructure projects had been abandoned in an attempt to meet the EUROPEAN restrictions. The Dutch authorities also lowered the maximum day time speed limit on highways to 100 kilometers one hour (61 mph). All of that still wasn’t enough though, therefore now the Finance and Agriculture Ministry wants to reduce the number of livestock by 30%.

The Netherlands has a significant number of farmers. In different given year, they increase some 4 million meat cattle alone. But decreasing the number of cattle by 30% will not only have ramifications for that Dutch, but all of the EUROPEAN, because The Netherlands is the biggest meat exporter in the EUROPEAN. 13

While the thought of a pollution-free world is definitely an attractive one, ultimately, the particular Green Agenda isn’t in regards to the environment — it’s about creating a control system in which the world’s resources are owned by the richest of the wealthy, while the rest of the population is controlled through the allocation of those resources, and that includes the share of food.

In September 2021, Rudi Buis, a spokesperson for the Dutch agriculture ministry, told The Guardian: 14

“ We are a relatively small country using a lot of inhabitants, industry, transport and agriculture, so we are reaching the limits of what nature can take. There exists a high level of urgency for all of us to tackle the nitrogen compounds problem. This means that in the near future, choices must be made. ”

Apparently, the option they’ve chosen is starvation and nutritional deficiencies for all. The saddest element of it is that eliminating meats production is not going to have the fantastic impact they say it will have. That is a fraudulent  greenwashing enterprise   that will destroy humanity instead.

While the notion of a pollution-free world is an attractive a single, ultimately, the Green Agenda isn’t about the environment — it’s about creating a manage system in which the world’s sources are owned by the richest of the rich, while the remaining population is controlled with the allocation of those resources, and that includes the allocation of meals.

The Global Food Reset Foretold by the Rockefeller Foundation

While looming food shortages are now blamed on climate modify and the Russia-Ukraine conflict, the particular Rockefeller Foundation discussed arriving food shortages as an inevitability back in July 2020, and called for a revamping from the food system to address this. Seeing how true prophets are few and considerably in between these days, it seems more reasonable to suspect that paper has been delineating a known, intentional plan.

The document in question, titled “ Reset the Table: Conference the Moment to Transform the particular U. S. Food Program, ” 15   was published Come july 1st 28, 2020. It details how the COVID pandemic had caused “ a hunger and nutrition crisis” within the U. S. “ unlike any this country has seen in generations. ”

Mind you, COVID was declared a pandemic Mar 11, 2020, so by the time this Rockefeller report was published, the pandemic experienced only existed for four months, and while certain high-risk groups did experience meals insecurity, such as children whose primary meal is a school lunch, widespread food disadvantages, in terms of empty shelves, were not widely prevalent or especially severe in the U. T.

The title itself is also revealing, as it’s a clear play for the Great Reset, which was formally announced by the World Financial Forum (WEF) and the Prince of Wales in early 06 2020. 16   The title on your own tells us that the Rockefeller Foundation’s call for a food system totally reset is part and parcel of the WEF’s Great Totally reset. Many of the contributors to the Foundation’s paper are WEF associates, which further strengthens this particular connection.

Within the foreword, 17   Rockefeller Foundation president Dr . Rajiv Shah furthermore stresses that “ a comprehensive playbook” to address the food system will also need to address some other issues, “ such as residing wages, housing and transportation, ” and that “ all of us” — meaning the self-proclaimed designers of the future — “ need to write that playbook together over the arriving year. ” What better way to predict the future than to actually create it?

All of those things — wages, housing and transportation — are all facets that will undergo dramatic revision underneath the Great Reset’s Fourth Industrial Revolution, as artificial intelligence, robotics, surveillance, social engineering and transhumanism (the merger of man with machine) take over.

Summary Take-Home of ‘ Reset the Table’

In summary, “ Reset the Table” describes how they intend to seize control of the food supply and the supply chain beneath the guise of “ equity, ” “ fairness” and “ environmental protection. ” As noted by ThreadsIrish on Substack: eighteen

“ The document is very much framed in the Hegelian dialectic of problem, reaction, solution. Here is the problem that they have created (COVID) and today they want to implement the solution (Transforming the global food supply). Naturally this is all ties into lands being destroyed, environment change and trying to proceed people back into smart metropolitan areas (Page 5). Surprise, surprise. ”

One key to this enterprise is data collection. They want to collect data on everyone’s spending and ways of eating, and to facilitate that data collection, they want to shift every thing into an online environment, which includes education, medicine and the obtaining food.

Another key to success is “ changes to guidelines, practices and norms. ” The goal is to focus control of the food supply into one executive office, which is correct in line with the idea of a “ one world government. ” As WEF member Henry Kissinger once said, “ Who controls the food provide controls the people; who settings the energy can control whole continents; who controls cash can control the world. ”

From Meat to Crickets

Getting back to the issue of Dutch beef production getting strangled, the reason global market leaders seem so unconcerned along with dwindling meat production is probably because they don’t want us to eat meat.   They intend for us to consume lab grown synthetic meats   that can be patented, and insects, 19   which can effortlessly and inexpensively be manufactured in mass quantities using hardly any land.

Since noted in a July 2021 WEF article titled, “ Why We Need to Give Pests the Role They Deserve in Our Food Systems, ” 20   insects are “ a credible and efficient alternate protein source requiring fewer resources than conventional mating, ” and “ a healthy ingredient” that is highly digestible and particularly suitable for senior nutrition.

Insect farming also requires couple of natural resources, such as drinking water, and could reduce agricultural air pollution by nearly 99%. The content points out that the last hurdle to making insect burgers the norm is “ preconceived concepts about insects as a supply of food and legislation with regard to the utilization and consumption of proteins produced from insects. ”

There are indications that “ Reset the Table” is promoting a diet of bugs as well, because while it tensions the need for a “ healthful diet” and “ lasting agriculture, ” the words “ organic” and “ lawn fed” do not appear just one time, and the word “ natural” is only used in mention of the “ natural disasters. ”

In other words, their particular versions of “ healthy diet” and “ sustainable agriculture” do not include what we know are basic requirements for a healthy, nutritious, eco friendly and regenerative food supply. The particular Foundation’s call for changes to “ policies, practices and norms” also indicates the diet they’re talking about involves something that is outside the tradition.

Both lab-grown meat and insects are usually outside the norm of what most people are willing to put in their own mouth, and thus policies as to what constitutes “ food” have to be changed, as do food creation practices and social norms about what’s acceptable to eat and what’s not.

Scientists Question Basic safety of Lab-Grown Meat

While venture capitalists see lab-grown meat alternatives as the cash cow for the future, many scientists are hesitant. In mid-June 2022, the middle for Food Safety (CFS) held a webinar where a panel of experts tackled a number of questions surrounding lab-grown meats, including safety plus regulatory issues. 21

One of the panelists was Michael Hansen, Ph. D., a older staff scientist with Customer Reports. He raised worries about cell-cultured meats, where biopsied cells from an animal are grown in fetal bovine blood (extracted from the live, aborted baby calf).

His priority revolves around the use of manipulated DNA segments, as that could have unforeseen consequences, but he pointed out that we also provide no data on the dietary composition of this kind of meats. As reported by The Defender: 22

“ According to Hansen, the piece of flesh biopsied from the animal is an undifferentiated stem cellular. The products use bio-engineered healthy proteins in a nutrient solution to generate the cells to differentiate into muscle for meat. This really is done in bio-reactor vats comparable to those used to make beverage.

While scientific papers possess covered topics related to cell-cultured meat, Hansen said, not one has actually analyzed the nutritional characteristics of the finished product, and academics have never received samples. This implies ‘ problems behind the scenes, ‘ Hansen said, adding, ‘ We doubt this technology will work. ‘”

Tom Neltner, chemical substances policy director at the Environmental Defense Fund (EDF), seemed to be part of the panel. Neltner mentioned that while sustainable protein resources are needed, lab-grown meats is going to be proprietary, meaning the full components list and how they’re produced is a trade secret, therefore “ We won’t understand their effect or what exactly they are. ” The Defender additional: 23

“ The concept of proprietary foodstuffs … led the panelists to address the regulation of cell-cultured meat and the role from the U. S. Food and Medication Administration (FDA), which one panelist called a ‘ captured’ agency.

Neltner said he worried cell-cultured meat might be ushered into the food supply underneath the FDA’s Generally Recognized As Safe program. Under the program, a company simply tells the FDA its product is safe, based on the company’s own documentation, plus bypasses the public comment process. ‘

Neltner, whose principal focus at the EDF is definitely food additive safety, said he preferred companies be required to submit to the FDA the ‘ food additive request, ‘ which includes a ‘ right to challenge. ‘

Panelists also raised concerns about the results novel ingredients may have upon aspects of the human microbiome. Hansen pointed out that 10 years ago, we’re able to not culture and study microbiome components. But now we can, and it’s important that we know these effects.

For example , Hansen said, it is now known that the genome and genes themselves could be affected by epigenetic changes without even touching the DNA …

Hansen said biopsied cells of an animal used in cell-cultured meat do not contain the immunity actions from the animal’s immune system, which could leave bio-reactor vats susceptible to bacteria such as salmonella, fungi and worse unless antibiotics are used. Cell-cultured meat producers claim they may not have to add antibiotics, although even alcohol distillers need to add them to their vats, Hansen said. ”

Get ready for Food Shortages

Everything now points in order to food shortages and starvation becoming a reality in many parts of the world, including the U. H. and Europe. 24   As yet, shops are still fairly well filled with essentials, but that will change come winter plus into 2023. This means you may only have another six months approximately to stock up.

This past Monday, I published an article with suggestions for methods to prepare. That article, “ Get Prepared Along with Shelf-Stable Foods , ” will be made available for free on Substack, so if you missed it, you can review it at this point.

–   Sources and Recommendations


The Crucial Difference Between the Drop of Sri Lanka and the Nederlander Uprising

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *