August 16, 2022

How Pfizer Profited From the Outbreak

Not only has pandemic doubled Pfizer’s annual revenue, it has also given the drugmaker distinctive weight in determining Oughout. S. health policy — something that concerns even staunch vaccine-pushers like Dr . John Offit

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

  • The COVID-19 pandemic has been a real boon in order to Pfizer. Not only has it bending Pfizer’s annual revenue, it offers also given the drugmaker unique weight in determining U. S. health plan — something that concerns actually staunch vaccine-pushers like Doctor Paul Offit
  • Pfizer’s revenue in 2021 was $81. 3 billion — approximately double that of 2020 — and the COVID shot accounted for $36. 78 billion of that
  • Pfizer’s COVID jab dominates 70% of the U. Ersus. and European markets, and Paxlovid, its COVID medication, has become a standard treatment selection in hospitals. This despite findings showing the photo doesn’t prevent infection or transmission, and that Paxlovid leads to severe rebound and supercharges mutations
  • The U. S. had disposed of 82. 2 million ended COVID jab doses since mid-May 2022, yet the Biden administration ordered another 105 million doses at the end of 06 2022 for a fall booster campaign that will cost taxpayers $3. 2 billion
  • Pfizer’s contracts are usually almost exclusively slanted within Pfizer’s favor. They’re assured payment while having no monetary liability for injuries plus deaths, and it appears this particular indemnification applies even if these were to be found guilty of fraud

According to Kaiser Health News (KHN), 1   the particular COVID-19 pandemic has been a true boon to Pfizer. Not just has it yielded “ outsize benefits” in terms of profits, but it has also “ given the particular drugmaker unusual weight within determining U. S. health policy. ”

“ Based on internal research, the company’s executives have frequently announced the next stage in the fight against the pandemic before government authorities have had time to study the matter, annoying many experts in the medical field and leaving a few patients unsure whom in order to trust, ”   KHN reporter Arthur Allen writes, adding: two

“ When last year Bourla suggested that a booster photo would soon be required, U. S. public wellness officials later followed, providing the impression that Pfizer was calling the tune.

Some public health experts and scientists worry these decisions were hasty, noting, for example , that although boosters with the mRNA shots made by Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech improve antibody protection initially, this generally doesn’t last.

Considering that January, Bourla has been saying that U. S. adults will most likely all need annual booster shots, and senior FDA officials have indicated since April that they agree … The company’s power worries several vaccinologists, who see the growing influence in a realm of medical decision-making typically led by independent experts …

When President Biden in September 2021 offered boosters to Americans — not long after [Pfizer CEO Albert] Bourla had recommended them — Dr . Paul Offit, director of the Shot Education Center at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia … wondered, ‘ Where’s the evidence you are at risk of serious condition when confronted with COVID if you are vaccinated and under 50? ‘

Policies on booster recommendations for different groups are usually complex and shifting, Offit said, but the CDC, instead of Bourla and Pfizer, ought to be making them. ‘ We’re getting pushed along, ‘ he said. ‘ The pharmaceutical companies are acting like public health agencies. ‘”

The truth that a vaccine-pusher like Offit — infamous for claiming a baby can safely tolerate 10, 000 vaccines at the same time 3   — is questioning plus pushing back against Pfizer’s influence over health plan reveals just how brazen, unethical and potentially dangerous which is.

Massive Earnings Made From Useless Products

According to Allen, Pfizer’s revenue in 2021 had been $81. 3 billion 4   — approximately double that of 2020 — and the COVID chance accounted for $36. 78 billion dollars 5   of that. For comparison, Lipitor, Pfizer’s previous top selling statin, generates roughly $2 billion dollars a year, 6   while their strep vaccine, Prevnar 13 rakes in $6 billion annually. 7

Its mRNA gene transfer injection against COVID now dominates 70% from the U. S. and European markets, and Paxlovid, Pfizer’s COVID drug, has become a regular treatment choice in private hospitals. This, despite researchers finding  Paxlovid (molnupiravir) causes severe rebound and supercharges mutations .

In a rational scenario, that finding would have put a stop to the use, but no . Within an official health advisory 8   towards the public, issued May 24, 2022, the U. S i9000. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention first warns that Paxlovid is connected with “ recurrence of COVID-19 or ‘ COVID-19 rebound, ‘” and then in the very next sentence stresses in bold print a narrative supporting its use and enriching Pfizer with guidelines saying:

“ Paxlovid continues to be recommended for early- phase treatment of mild to moderate COVID-19 among persons from high risk for progression in order to severe disease. ”

Allen also notes that, throughout an investor call, the Pfizer official highlighted reviews of Paxlovid’s failure, yet spun it into “ good news” for traders, as patients may require multiple courses! 9   Obviously the objective offers long ago shifted from helping humans to raping them for as much profit as possible.

Similarly, whilst Pfizer’s COVID jab clearly doesn’t prevent infection or spread, and Americans are rejecting the shots within growing numbers — 82. 2 million doses got expired and were chucked in the trash as of mid-May 2022 10   — the U. S. government still proceeded to go ahead and ordered another 105 million doses in late June 2022.

These are intended for a drop booster campaign, at a cost to taxpayers of $3. 2 billion. 11   The U. S. is actually paying about 50% more for each of such new jab boosters this time around — $30. 47 for each dose compared to $19. 50 per dose paid for the first 100 million doses.

The U. S. government has also promised to buy another 20 million courses of Paxlovid, at an eye-watering cost of $530 per five-day course. Basically, Pfizer is being financially rewarded for generating products that are useless at best and dangerous at most severe, and we’re all paying for it. In the event that you’re curious, that is another $10. 6 billion moved from U. S. taxpayers to Pfizer.

Future Boosters Won’t Go through Human Clinical Trials

After you likely thought it couldn’t ever obtain any worse, KHN also details on, but doesn’t explore, the fact that Pfizer suggested they will skip human trials as they move forward with jabs that are reformulated for newer versions. If this strikes you as crazy, you’d be right. It can sheer madness, but the U. S. Food and Drug Management — a clearly captured agency — has already surreptitiously agreed to this egregious losing the unborn baby of science.

How this wicked plan, known as the “ Future Platform, ” 12   was adopted from the FDA without formal vote is explained by Toby Rogers, Ph. D. — a political economist whose research focus is upon regulatory capture and Big Pharma corruption thirteen   — in the video above. He also explained it in a June 29, 2022, Substack article: 14

“ Yesterday [June 28], the particular FDA’s Vaccines and Associated Biological Products Advisory Committee approved a bivalent COVID-19 shot with the Wuhan strain and the Omicron variant … Wait, hold up, I thought the FDA was voting within the Future Framework yesterday?

The particular policy question was whether or not reformulated COVID-19 shots will be treated as new molecular entities (which they are) in which case they should be subject to official review or whether reformulated shots would be treated since ‘ biologically similar’ to existing Covid-19 shots and become allowed to skip clinical trials altogether.

Apparently the FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION did not have the votes to just pass this as a policy question. If you ask anybody whether reformulated mRNA signifies a new molecular entity, nicely of course it is, so that would require formal regulatory evaluation.

What the FDA did rather was to smuggle the policy question in disguised as a vote about reformulated ‘ boosters’ for the fall.

In essence, the FDA simply started doing the Future Framework (picking variants willy nilly, skipping clinical trials) and essentially dared the panel members to turn down the booster dose — knowing that all of the VRBPAC members are usually hand-picked because they’ve by no means met a vaccine these people did not like.

So of course only two people on the panel had the courage to turn down a booster dosage — even though it was depending on this preposterous process (that was never formally adopted) where there was literally simply no data at all … By stealth, the FDA changed a system based on evidence using a system based entirely upon belief. ”

Countries Held to Ransom

In 2021, secret information on Pfizer’s contracts came to lighting, showing they are essentially holding countries hostage to non-bargainable demands for payment completely AND freedom from liability. 15

In late February 2021, The Bureau of Investigative Journalism reported sixteen   that Pfizer was demanding countries set up sovereign assets as collateral for expected vaccine damage lawsuits resulting from its COVID-19 jab.

Many countries, including Brazil, Chile, Colombia, the Dominican Republic and Peru, agreed to this particular demand, putting up bank supplies, military bases and embassy buildings as collateral. To put it briefly, theses governments are guaranteeing Pfizer will be compensated for virtually any expenses resulting from injury lawsuits against it, so the organization won’t lose a penny if its COVID chance injures people.

Shockingly, these terms are usually binding even if those accidents are the result of negligent organization practices, fraud or malice!

“ Government purchasers must recognize that the effectiveness and safety of the shots are totally unknown, all while indemnifying Pfizer against any and all economic liability. ”

In October that will same year, Public Resident published the secret contracts 17, 18   between Pfizer and Albania, Brazil, Colombia, Chile, Dominican Republic, the European Payment, Peru, the U. H. and the U. K., additional revealing the extent to which these countries handed energy over to Pfizer. In almost all scenarios, Pfizer’s interests arrive first.

For example , government purchasers must acknowledge that the effectiveness and safety of the shots are totally unknown, all while indemnifying Pfizer against any and all monetary liability. This is the ultimate business maleficence, using their leverage in order to force the kill photo down these countries’ throats and avoiding any private responsibility for damages.

Even if Pfizer eventually is convicted of scams in the U. S. and loses all its legal responsibility protection from the COVID jabs because of it, that view would not impact these international contracts. These countries offered their souls to Pfizer and have absolutely no recourse yet to pay even if the shots destroy everyone.

The particular contracts for at least 4 countries also secure Pfizer’s intellectual property rights even if the company is found to have stolen intellectual property rights of others. In such case, the government purchaser becomes the liable celebration. As explained by Community Citizen: 19

“ For example , if another vaccine maker sued Pfizer for patent infringement in Colombia, the contract needs the Colombian government to foot the bill. Pfizer also explicitly says that it does not guarantee that the product does not violate third-party IP, or that it requirements additional licenses.

Pfizer takes no responsibility in these contracts for its potential infringement associated with intellectual property. In a sense, Pfizer has secured an IP waiver for itself. Yet internationally, Pfizer is combating similar efforts to waive IP barriers for all manufacturers. ”

Equally shocking is that countries are forced to follow through on their vaccine orders even though other drugs or remedies emerge that can prevent, deal with or cure COVID-19. 20   Is it any wonder, then, that will governments around the world have suppressed the use of safe and effective outpatient medicines like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin?

If these types of drugs were allowed to be taken and could be proven to function, the COVID injections will be completely unnecessary and their particular emergency use authorization would disappear, yet governments take the hook for billions of doses.

Pfizer Has ‘ Continual Offender’ Track Record

The fact that Pfizer has socialized like a criminal who works out a cover story for a planned murder before committing it is not surprising, considering its history. Pfizer, has been sued in multiple venues over dishonest behavior, including unethical drug testing and illegal marketing practices. 21

In his the year 2010 paper, 22   “ Tough upon Crime? Pfizer and the CIHR, ” Robert G. Evans, Ph. D., Emeritus Professor at Vancouver School associated with Economics, described Pfizer because “ a ‘ continual offender, ‘ persistently participating in illegal and corrupt advertising practices, bribing physicians plus suppressing adverse trial outcomes. ”

In between 2002 and 2010 on your own, Pfizer and its subsidiaries were fined $3 billion in criminal convictions, civil fees and penalties and jury awards. They may be recurrent criminal felons. None of these convictions has deterred their nefarious behavior.

In 2011, Pfizer decided to pay another $14. five million to settle federal costs of illegal marketing, 23   and 2014 they settled federal government charges relating to improper advertising of the kidney transplant drug Rapamune to the tune of $35 million, 24   as well as $75 million to settle charges concerning its testing of a brand new broad spectrum antibiotic upon critically ill Nigerian kids.

As reported by the Independent 25   at the time, Pfizer sent a team associated with doctors into Nigeria in the midst of a meningitis epidemic. For two weeks, the team set up right next to a medical station run by Physicians Without Borders and began dispensing the experimental medication, Trovan. Of the 200 children picked, half got the experimental drug and the other half the already licensed antibiotic Rocephin.

Eleven of the children treated from the Pfizer team died, and many others suffered side effects such as human brain damage and organ failing. Pfizer denied wrongdoing. Based on the company, only five of the children given Trovan passed away, compared to six who obtained Rocephin, so their medication was not to blame.

The problem was they never told the parents that their children were being given an experimental drug. What’s more, whilst Pfizer produced a authorization letter from a Nigerian ethics committee, the letter ended up to have been backdated. The particular ethics committee itself was not set up until a year after the trial had already taken place. Pfizer’s rap sheet furthermore includes bribery, environmental infractions, labor and worker security violations and more. twenty six

Baby wolves in Sheep’s Clothing

Now, despite Pfizer being one of the least ethical drug companies, we’re informed to trust them with our own very lives, and the lifestyles of our precious children. They’re going to put out booster shots this particular fall that have undergone absolutely no testing whatsoever, and we’re to simply throw caution to the wind because Pfizer — which has no liability whatsoever — says so.

In 2014, Pfizer experienced a surge of legal cases that accused it associated with hiding known side effects of its anticholesterol drug Lipitor. 27   They got off scot-free that period, as a federal judge terminated thousands of cases alleging the drug caused Type two diabetes. 28, twenty nine   But at least they had liability and could end up being sued.

With regards to the COVID jabs, wounded patients and family members of these killed by it won’t have the ability to sue for problems, as governments around the world possess indemnified them completely, also it looks as though they might not even be liable even if these people found guilty of fraud. But we will have to see what the courts rule on that certain. Still, that any country would agree to a contract like that is just mindboggling.

Meanwhile, mounting evidence displays the  COVID shots destroy immune function   over time, and  Pfizer’s own trial data reveal deaths and severe adverse events   numbering in the tens of thousands.

It’s hard to tell who’s more deserving of abuse — Pfizer or the equally captured federal agencies, the particular FDA and the CDC, that go along with them and do absolutely nothing to protect the lives from the youngest members of our community. Clearly, it’s up to all of us to protect ourselves and our own loved ones, because wolves within sheep’s clothing are ruling the roost — they’re making all the decisions, and captured agencies are simply carrying out their bidding.

This article first appeared at Mercola. com .

–   Sources plus References


The Vaccine Presentation Meeting


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *