August 16, 2022

When Government Can Take From One Group, It Can and Will Take Through Everyone

Whilst governments have been assaulting private property rights for many years, they will now are ramping up the pressure. Nothing less than the civilization is at stake

It didn’t be an exaggeration to dispute that private property legal rights, as understood by traditional liberal thinkers, by those who embrace Austrian economic theory, and by all members of the enlightened society, are not only the cornerstone, but also the last defense of human civilization as well as the Western way of life in particular.

Nothing stands a chance without this particular premise. No prosperity may ever come about or even be maintained, none of the city liberties and human freedoms we so often take for granted these days, no innovation in business, technologies or science.

The respect of the individual’s property is at the heart on most of our freedoms, and when their state or any other central power crosses this big crimson line, it causes a massive domino effect.

This erosion of liberty might be slow, but it certainly is steady, and many citizens only realize the potential risks they’re facing only when they have too late to do anything about this.

The Relentless Campaign

States’ incursion to their citizens’ lives, businesses, cost savings, and fundamental human liberties, like free speech, is certainly nothing new.

In fact , it is a concerted campaign that has been going on arguably since the first form of central government emerged.

Even without the (rather safe) assumption that megalomania and a pathological thirst regarding power and control over other people were the core inspiration behind this, there will always be those among us that believe they what’s best for others and are only too eager to “ help” and “ save” them.

However , this press toward centralization has observed a significant acceleration over the past number of decades.

Right after mostly unelected European Union bureaucrats and technocrats consolidated strength in Europe and condition powers were eroded in favor of federal authorities and countless agencies in the United States, the needle really moved, and even though nothing happened from one day time to the next, this shift definitely set the West to the path of more and more centralization.

Poisonous ideologies and misanthropic worldviews, like those promoted by Frankfurt school and their long march through the institutions, were of considerable help along the way.

Window-dressing state control and massive wealth redistribution policies as “ welfare” and advertising them as citizens’ “ duty” to “ give back” aided in hiding what was really taking place. Home rights became conditional.

If a thief shop lifts your money, you have every directly to complain, and he’ll visit prison.

But if the state does exactly the same thing, then only a sociopath might complain, because the state is providing you and your neighbors with all kinds of “ free” stuff.

Only a self-responsible person and the enlightened group understand that government can only provide what it has stolen just before. Most of the citizens still have confidence in the nanny-state myth and in free lunches.

The concept of “ free” along with “ public goods” in particular appears to have stuck more than anything else.

Particularly in Europe and in much of the particular Commonwealth, there is to this day not just a clear understanding, but an expectation in the minds on most citizens that things like education and learning and healthcare are and must always be “ totally free. ”

Hardly anyone stops and questions what this means, and how services that obviously cost amazing amounts of money can be totally free.

Every time there might be an election around the corner, the particular incumbent governments start tossing all kinds of subsidies and extra well being benefits from helicopters.

The recipients of those checks, even when they are people themselves, still perceive these payments as government assistance, as though their prime ressortchef (umgangssprachlich) or president and all their particular cabinet members had just reached into their own wallets given gifts, out of the kindness of their hearts.

Of course , once wealth redistribution became established as the tradition, it also became much easier to press a much more aggressive agenda.

Once again, with all the aforementioned ideological and politics “ packaging, ” a fierce hatred started to get root, dividing our communities in extremely dangerous ways, but also really expediting the particular concentration of power in the hands of the few.

We have observed a huge escalation of this within the last twenty-five years.

The “ rich, ” the “ 1 percent, ” the “ privileged” and the “ greedy capitalists” are all terms that attempted to explain some largely mythical group of people that had their footwear on the throats of everyone else.

In the beginning, it was just money that will made some people instantly evil and thereby justified making use of state force to dispossess them. However , this soon expanded to success generally.

Just being better than one’s peers, working harder, cultivating a specific talent, it all became reason enough for anyone to become a member of that hated group.

Naturally, this is just about all part and parcel of the wider “ divide and conquer” strategy that most politicians still use today— perhaps more than ever.

And once politicians legitimized the particular penalization of job makers and innovators by encroaching upon their property rights, it had been much easier to deny these people their own other rights too.

And as for those who may still find that idea instead pleasing, mainly due to jealousy and under the assumption that they will never count themselves one of the members of this “ elite, ” it always useful to remember that when the state says it is only targeting the “ 1 percent, ” this is always a pure sit.

The particular “ 1 percent” is just not the actual percentage that is struggling the tax hikes, and it also most certainly is not just those that are usually better off who pay the cost.

Policy makers are always trying to maximize the profit they get out of every power and money get they sign into law.

Thus, the newest tax that is supposed to target “ evil multinationals” almost always affects much smaller enterprises as well, local businesses and mom-and-pop shops.

But what is even more important is that, unlike governments, most private companies operate under rational, basic economic dynamics.

“ Profit-driven” has turned into something of a curse word these days, yet profit still is what makes the whole world go round, what pays wages and stocks the grocery store shelves.

And so, large plus small businesses alike consider the tax burden part of their expenses, and if taxes squeeze their particular bottom lines, these costs are simply passed on to clients. Therefore , everyone pays for this particular property rights violation, not simply its stated targets.


This article is the first of a two-part series. Continue to  part 2 .

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *