August 16, 2022

Canadian Pastor Arrested For Holding Church Services During COVID Wins Legal Victory

Appeals court guidelines Alberta Health Agency’s order prohibiting “illegal public gatherings” was “not sufficiently apparent and unambiguous”

Most of the narratives surrounding the particular covid pandemic and the lockdowns were illogical and faulty, based in propaganda rather than technology and fear instead of reason.  

One key concern that was never addressed simply by lockdown proponents was the query of “ risk. ”   Doesn’t every individual have a natural right to consider whatever risks they discover as acceptable when it comes to their own health?   If a group of people want to go to a church service and take the risk they might get covid, don’t they have got the right to do that?

Of course , lockdown supporters may claim that those refusing in order to comply with mandates don’t have a right to put “ other people at risk, ” but how much danger from covid is there actually?

According to a large number of independent and peer evaluated studies from around the world, the actual “ risk” of death from covid is limited.   Studies indicate that the median Infection Fatality Rate (or Ratio) of covid is between  0. 23% and 0. 27%   of the population.   This is the contrary mainstream technology that the media rarely discusses.

So , 99. 7% of all people (according to the science) on average face no mortal risk in the worst variants of covid.   IFR is in most cases the most accurate statistic within the death rate of a virus because it accounts for asymptomatic situations.   Case Fatality Price (CFR), the stat usually used more by the mainstream media, does not.   However, World Health Organization  notes on its web site   that:     “ The true severity of a disease can be explained by the Infection Fatality Ratio… ”

When you compare covid to a virus like the Spanish Flu, which murdered over 50 million people worldwide  according to the CDC , one would think that there is a measure of apprehension with regards to violating the freedoms of the public.   Nope.   The relatively low level of risk associated with covid made no difference to governments or global institutions.   They charged forward such as bulls in a china shop breaking everything in their path and treating unilateral “ mandates” as if they were laws.  

Luckily, the tide has been slowly turning back and resistance to lockdowns and vaccine passports has been more pervasive than numerous officials seem to have anticipated.   In most conservative claims within the US, the lockdowns ended quickly, within a few months in many cases, once it was noticed that covid was not the population monster that the media, the CDC and the WHO had caused it to be out to be.   Leftist blue states and nations like Canada were not therefore lucky.  

Canadian Pastor Artur Pawlowski experienced the full brunt associated with medical authoritarianism first hand when, on May 9, 2021, he sought to hold the church service for his congregants only to be caught along with his brother Dawid Pawlowski for “ inciting a good in-person gathering. ”  

In Oct of 2021, a Determine ruled that the Pastor is at violation of a covid health order.   The consequence was bizarre and Orwellian; he was heavily fined, and whenever he talked publicly about covid he’d be required to recite a government-approved statement saying that “ the majority of medical experts support social distancing, face masks, and vaccines. ”   When the courtroom says “ most specialists, ” they are of course mentioning government paid “ specialists. ”   There are many medical experts that disagree with the effectiveness of the lockdowns and other requires.  

Experts, with over 18, 500 studies and after four levels of screening, found 24 papers that would provide a stringent evaluation of lockdown effects. They found that lockdowns decreased covid mortality in the United States plus Europe by  just 0. 2 percent   on average. They also looked at forced shelter-in-place, which reduced mortality by only second . 9 percent on average.

The researchers got this final conclusion:

“ While this meta-analysis concludes that lockdowns have had little to no general public health effects, they have imposed enormous economic and social costs where they have been adopted. In consequence, lockdown guidelines are ill-founded and should end up being rejected as a pandemic plan instrument. ”

This week an  appeals court ruled   that the Alberta Health Agency’s order prohibiting “ illegal public gatherings” was “ not sufficiently clear plus unambiguous” in connection to the particular Pawlowskis.

“ The Pawlowskis’ appeals are allowed. The finding associated with contempt and the sanction purchase are set aside. The fines that have been paid by choices to be reimbursed, ” the three-member panel proclaimed in the 16-page ruling.  

Pawlowski grew up under communist rule in Poland and this is likely the root associated with his refusal to comply.   He’s seen all of this before, including the typical religious persecution inherent in communist societies.  

The legal victory is really a clear reminder that the dread surrounding potential crisis activities is often exploited and abused by governments to remove personal freedoms and legal protections.   It is these moments in history when individual rights are MORE important, not really less, because whenever there is a crisis the worst forms of tyrants tend to come out of the woodwork.  

PRESS BOMBSHELL: Steve Bannon talks about the Great Reset with Alex Jones.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *