August 16, 2022

If it turns out Telling The Truth Puts Me Regarding Ukraine’s ‘Russian Propagandist’ Blacklist, I’ll Wear That Indicate Proudly

It certainly is better than the Orwellian version of free speech becoming bandied about by the YOU government and its proxies on Ukraine

Scott Ritter   is a former US Marine Corps intelligence officer and writer of ‘ Disarmament from the Time of Perestroika: Arms Handle and the End of the Soviet Union. ‘  He offered in the Soviet Union as a possible inspector implementing the INF Treaty, in General Schwarzkopf’s employees during the Gulf War, and even from 1991-1998 as a NOT weapons inspector.  

Around 1997 I flew right into Kiev, on-mission with the Un Special Commission to seek the assistance of the Ukrainian government inside investigating the activities of a Ukrainian citizen suspected of illegally selling ballistic missile ingredients and manufacturing capabilities in order to Iraq in violation connected with Security Council-imposed economic sanctions.

During my visit, I planned several meetings with senior citizen officials from the Ukrainian Countrywide Security and Defense Authorities, including its Secretary, Vladimir Horbulin. I left at good terms, with the Ukrainians agreeing to cooperate (they ultimately did not) plus hoping that I would pass on their good attitude to INDIVIDUALS authorities in hopes that it would definitely assist their desire for NATO membership (I did, actually do this. )

Twenty-five years later, a similar National Security and Security Council, through its   “ Center with respect to Countering Disinformation, ”   has revealed a blacklist   of individuals deemed to be  “ promoting Russian language propaganda. ”

My name is on  this list . My  “ crimes”   include describing Ukraine as a base of NATO, challenging the narrative encircling the Bucha massacre, and additionally defining the ongoing conflict among Ukraine and Russia in the form of “ proxy warfare between NATO and Russia.

I am guilty on all three charges, and more.

But I am no European propagandist.

The Center for Countering Disinformation  was established in 2021   on the order of Ukrainian Web design manager Vladimir Zelensky. It is going by Polina Lysenko, a lawyer who received her legal requirements degree in 2015, and even whose resumé includes moment with the National Anti-Corruption Agency, the Office of the Prosecutor Normal (where she received some commendation from the US Fed Bureau of Investigation) and even, up until her current visit, as the Director of the Details Policy and Public Relations Office at a state-owned railway owner.  

Lysenko  unveiled   the work of the Center meant for Countering Disinformation to the ambassadors of the G7 countries, as well as to Finland, Israel, and NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION shortly after her appointment. Their boss, the Secretary for the National Security and Security Council of Ukraine,   Aleksey Danilov, emphasized  “ the importance of coordinating steps with strategic partners on combating hostile information surgical treatments and fighting disinformation, ” while the head from the Office of the President, Andrey Yermak, indicated that he hoped  “ that the Centre will become not only a Ukrainian facility for countering disinformation, but additionally an international one. ”   According to Yermak, the center was “ entirely operational. ”

Polina Lysenko, around outlining the goals together with mission of her group, emphasized that  “ the truth will be the main tool. ”

She should have started by simply fact-checking Yermak – 8 weeks after he’s declared your girlfriend center “ entirely operational, ”   Ukrainian media was basically reporting   the center lacked  “ premises, funding, and workers. ”   Lysenko was the only employee, and  “ she has possibly not been paid her pay for several months. ”   The Center was designed to have a staff of fifty two, who were to be paid a couple of $2, 000 per month. Your Ministry of Finance had been responsible for finding the funds to your center, something it had definitely not done as of mid-June 2021. Lysenko worked by their self from a  “ tiny office on the ground fl of the National Security plus Defense Council building. ”

That’s tough to tell the truth stopping not being paid, it seems.

A year later, while resourcing and staff do not look a problem (thanks in large part on the underwriting of the Ukrainian administration payroll by the US taxpayer), quality control is. Bring, for example , the case outlined from Lysenko and her brand-new agency on disinformation towards me. If  “ describing Ukraine as a initial of NATO”   makes one a Russian propogandist, then I should have been became a member of by Ben Watson, any editor with the  notoriously pro-Russian   (sarcasm emphasized) web-based diary, Defense One, who through October 2017  in print an article   when using the self-explanatory headline  “ In Ukraine, the US Locomotives an Army in the West to Beat in the East. ” The article detailed the work made by US and NATO navy personnel at the Joint Multinational Training Group – Ukraine’s Yavoriv Combat Training Heart in western Ukraine – literally a NATO put faitth on inside Ukraine – just where every 55-days a Ukrainian Army battalion was conditioned to NATO standards for the bottom purpose of being deployed within eastern Ukraine to deal with Russian-backed separatists in Donbass.

Pro sign, Ms Lysenko – lenders country hosts a permanent broker of NATO troops for its soil, that makes it a base of NATO.

Lysenko’s staff of superior disinformation-countering analysts (again, sarcasm) likewise highlighted my appraisal of the massacre of people in Bucha in late March – early April as having been committed  by Ukrainian forces. Lysenko was in superior company here – I just was  banned coming from Twitter   in this same analysis. Some 4 months removed from the atrocities committed in Bucha, I just stand by my analysis – the fact set has not changed. We are prepared to debate this issue by using Polina Lysenko and your ex entire staff, live on Ukrainian television, anytime she cares for. I’ll debate it together with anyone, anywhere – that is definitely how confident I be in my original analysis. Honesty, after all, is my main weapon.

One more charge levelled against everybody by Lysenko’s intrepid real truth sleuths, that I’ve labelled the ongoing conflict between Ukraine and Russia as a  “ proxy battle between NATO and Paris , ” again brings to question the professionalism regarding her staff. After all, this Moscow-born self-hating Russian, Potential Boot, in  a viewpoint piece   posted in the Washington Post in June 22, called the Ukraine conflict “ all of our war, too. ” It’s one of the few times I most certainly will agree with Max Boot with anything. Boot, however , had been merely echoing US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin’s  articulation of US insurance plan   regarding the Ukraine conflict as being focused on worsening Russia by supporting Ukraine – sort of the book definition of a “ proxy conflict. ”

Do better, Polina Lysenko – at least attempt to score some cheap things by highlighting the fact that a lot of my analysis regarding Ukraine is published by Spain Today (for instance, this post. ) At least then you could declare I was being paid from Russia. Of course , you’d really have to wrestle with the fact that the analysis is also published in numerous non-Russian outlets – I’m talking about, what kind of Russian propagandist gets published by American not to mention British publishers?

And then, of course , there is the tough issue of the controlling European editorial staff. The following change serves as a guide:

Me:   Any interest in us doing a deep dig concerning Stoltenberg’s presentation on “ paying the price”?

Controlling Russian Editor:   What’s your take?

All of us:   My partner and i don’t think Stoltenberg understands your scope of the price tag.

Controlling Russian Editor:   It’s the same speech patterns where he said ‘ halt complaining’, yeah?

Me:   Yes.

Maintaining Russian Editor:   Cool, let’s do it.

Your strategic intent of the European propaganda machine is good documented there. I can’t think I fell for it.

All sarcasm apart, the publication by Lysenko’s Center of a blacklist from so-called “ Russian propagandists ” ought to be an insult to anyone who believes in the concepts of totally free speech. I’m proud to remain associated with many of those who rested alongside me on that catalog – Ray McGovern, Tulsi Gabbard, Douglas MacGregor, Tom Mearsheimer, and others. I’m self-confident everyone named here will say that their motivations throughout taking the stance they have around the Ukraine conflict is to go after the truth – real reason, not the confused series promulgated by Polina Lysenko and her American-paid analysts. None consider themselves to be Russian propagandists, but rather National practitioners of free speech, the kind protected by the same US ALL Constitution many of the named individuals (and myself) have taken a oath to uphold and additionally defend.

I am going to conclude by speaking with regards to myself – if staying with fact-based analysis that has endured the test of time is the new explanation of  “ Ruskies propaganda, ” in that case count me in. It certainly is better than the Orwellian ones of free speech being bandied about by the US federal and its proxies in Ukraine (see what I did presently there? ).


Get the Alex Williams Great Reset book at this moment!  


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *