August 19, 2022

EL, World Economic Forum Behind Global ‘War On Farmers’: Experts

If left uncontrolled, the U. N. -backed sustainability policies on agriculture and food production might lead to economic devastation, disadvantages of critical goods, widespread famine, and a dramatic loss of individual freedoms, multiple professionals said.

The increasing regulatory attack on agricultural producers from Holland and the United States to Sri Lanka and beyond is closely associated with the United Nations’ “ Agenda 2030” Sustainable Growth Goals and the U. And. ‘s partners at the World Economic Forum (WEF), many experts told The Epoch Times.

Indeed, several of the U. N. ‘s 17 Eco friendly Development Goals (SDGs) are directly implicated in policies that are squeezing farmers, ranchers, and food supplies all over the world.

High-level Chinese Communist Party (CCP) people within the U. N. system  helped create the SDGs and are currently helping   lead the organization’s implementation of the global plan, The Epoch Periods has previously documented.

If left uncontrolled, multiple experts said, the particular U. N. -backed sustainability policies on agriculture plus food production would lead to economic devastation, shortages associated with critical goods, widespread famine, and a dramatic loss of individual freedoms.

Klaus Schwab, founder and executive chairman of the World Economic Discussion board (WEF), is seen at the starting of the WEF Davos Agenda in Cologny, Switzerland, upon Jan. 17, 2022. (FABRICE COFFRINI/AFP via Getty Images)

Already, millions of people worldwide are usually facing dangerous food shortages, and officials around the world say those are set to get worse as the year goes on.

There is an agenda at the rear of it all, experts told The particular Epoch Times.

Even private land ownership is in the crosshairs, as global food production and the world economy are transformed to meet the global sustainability objectives, U. N. documents reviewed by The Epoch Times display.

As described by the U. N.   on its SDG website , the objectives adopted in 2015 “ build on decades of work by countries and the Oughout. N. ”

One of the earliest meetings determining the “ sustainability” agenda was the U. N. Conference on Human Settlements known as Habitat I, which adopted the  Vancouver Announcement .

The agreement stated that “ land cannot be treated as an ordinary asset controlled simply by individuals” and that private property ownership is “ a principal instrument of deposition and concentration of wealth, therefore contributes to social injustice. ”

“ Public control of land make use of is therefore indispensable, ” the U. N. announcement said, a prelude to the World Economic Forum’s right now infamous “ prediction” that by 2030, “ you may own nothing. ”

Numerous U. And. agencies and officials possess outlined their vision of “ sustainability” since then, which includes calls for drastic restrictions on energy, meat consumption, journey, living space, and material prosperity.

Experts interviewed by The Epoch Times declare some of the world’s wealthiest and many powerful corporate leaders are working with communists in China and elsewhere in an effort to focus control over food production and crush independent farmers and ranchers.

Tractors drive by Dutch police officers position guard as police shut access to Apeldoorn on the A2 highway to block maqui berry farmers from demonstrating against the Nederlander government’s plans to cut nitrogen emissions, on June 29, 2022. (JEROEN JUMELET/ANP/AFP through Getty Images)

According to experts of the policies, though, the particular goal isn’t to preserve environmental surroundings or fight climate change at all.   Instead, professionals warn that the “ sustainability” narrative and the other justifications are a tool to gain control over food, agriculture, and people.

“ The end objective of these efforts is to reduce sovereignty on both individual countries and people, ” said Craig Rucker, president of the Panel for a Constructive Tomorrow (CFACT), a public policy firm specializing in environmental and growth issues.

“ The intent for those pressing this agenda is not in order to save the planet, as they purport, yet to increase control over people, ” he told The Epoch Times, adding that the goal is to centralize power on the national and even international degree.

UN Sustainable Development Goals— Agenda 2030 

The U. N. Environmentally friendly Development Goals, often referred to as Agenda 2030, were adopted within 2015 by the organization and its particular member states as a facts “ transforming our world. ”   Hailed as a “ master plan for humanity” and a global “ declaration associated with interdependence” by top U. N. officials, the 17 goals include 169 goals involving every facet of the particular economy and life.

“ All nations and all stakeholders, acting in collaborative partnership, will put into action this plan, ” declares the particular preamble to the document, repeatedly noting that “ no one will be left behind. ”

Among other components, the U. N. plan calls for national and international wealth redistribution in Goal 10, as well as “ basic changes in the way that our communities produce and consume goods and services. ”

Making use of government to transform most of economic activity is a vital part of the SDGs, with Goal 12 demanding “ sustainable consumption and production designs. ”

Among the specific targets outlined within Goal 12 are several straight linked to agricultural policies that undermine food production. These include “ sustainable management plus efficient use of natural assets. ”

Perhaps more importantly, the document needs “ environmentally sound administration of chemicals and all waste materials throughout their life routine, in accordance with agreed international frameworks. ”

Because of this, people and especially farmers should “ significantly reduce their release to air, drinking water, and soil in order to reduce their adverse impacts on human health and the environment. ”

Other SDGs that are directly tied to what critics have called the “ war on farmers” consist of Goal 14, which contact information “ marine pollution of kinds, in particular from land-based activities, including … nutritional pollution. ” The U. N. regularly describes agriculture and food production as a threat to the ocean.

The U. In. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), led by former CCP Vice Minister of Agriculture and Rural Affairs Qu Dongyu, is helping to direct the charge.

In its 2014 report “ Building a Common Eyesight for Sustainable Food and Agriculture: Principles and Approaches , ” the U. N. agency calls for drastic limitations on the use of fertilizers, insect sprays, emissions, and water within the agricultural sector.

As an example of how agriculture should be reformed to be considered sustainable by the U. N., the FAO report declares that “ excessive use of nitrogen fertilizer is a major reason for water pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. ”

The Rome-based FAO didn’t respond to a request for comment.

Then-French President Nicolas Sarkozy (L) provides a speech during a three-day summit on food security in U. N. Food and Farming Organisation (FAO) in Ancient rome on June 3, 2008. (CHRISTOPHE SIMON/AFP via Getty Images)

Another of the seventeen SDGs with a direct impact on agriculture and food creation is Goal 2, using its calls for “ sustainable agriculture” and “ sustainable meals production. ”

Goal 6, meanwhile, demands “ sustainable management of water, ” which includes different targets involving agricultural drinking water use and runoff.

Because U. In. leaders see agriculture and food production as crucial contributors to what they contact manmade climate change, Goal 13 is important, too. It calls for governments to “ integrate climate change procedures into national policies, methods, and planning. ”

Goal 15, which usually deals with sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems, also has multiple focuses on that affect agriculture and food production.

All over the world, national and regional governments are working with Oughout. N. agencies to put into action these sustainability goals within agriculture and other sectors.

For instance, responding to U. N. biodiversity agreements, the European Union has  enacted numerous U. N. -backed biodiversity programs   like Natura 2000 and the EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030, that have been cited by the Dutch govt and others in their agricultural guidelines.

The U. N. also  features publicly   regarding its role in impacting the SDGs in Sri Lanka and other nations suffering from food shortages and economic calamities linked to the very same global durability programs.

Around the world, almost every national government states it’s incorporating the SDGs into its own laws and regulations.

World Economic Forum ‘ Partnership’ 

Alongside the U. N. are various “ stakeholders” that are crucial to implementing sustainable advancement policies through “ public-private partnerships. ”

At the heart of that effort is the WEF, which since 2020 has been pushing a total change for better of society known as the “ Great Reset. ”   In 2019, the WEF signed a “ tactical partnership” with the U. And. to advance Agenda 2030 within the global business community.

Epoch Times Photo
Logo of the World Economic Forum taken at the Congress Centre 24 January 2007. (JOEL SAGET/AFP via Getty Images)

The official agreement defined “ areas of cooperation to deepen institutional engagement and jointly accelerate the execution of the 2030 Agenda with regard to Sustainable Development. ”

Many of the key officials behind Agenda 2030, which includes top U. N. market leaders such as current Secretary-General Antó nio Guterres— a self-proclaimed socialist— have also been working with the particular WEF for decades.

Meanwhile, the WEF continues to be explicit with its goals. This recently launched a “ Food Action Alliance” (FAA) that acknowledges on the website that Agenda 2030 “ informs the end goal of the FAA to provide an enduring and long-term platform to get multi-stakeholder action on meals systems to meet the SDGs. ”

Alongside the U. N. is “ Food Systems Summit” in September 2021, the particular WEF’s FAA released a written report outlining its own “ leadership agenda for multi-stakeholder collaboration to transform food systems . ”

Among other components, the document summarizes the FAA’s insights on “ supporting transformative food system partnerships, and its value proposition beyond the UN Foods Systems Summit 2021 towards achieving the UN Environmentally friendly Development Goals. ”

The WEF’s community concern with transforming agriculture as well as the food supply goes back over a decade, at least.

Together with various companies, the WEF released a 2010  report   setting out a “ new eyesight for agriculture” that integrated a “ roadmap with regard to stakeholders. ” Many of the planet’s largest food companies that will dominate the market and own countless popular brands are involved.

The WEF’s website is packed with info purporting to justify a total transformation of the food supply by “ stakeholders. ”

“ As global food systems become progressively interconnected, effective coordination amongst a diverse set of stakeholders will be required, ” WEF says on its “ Strategic Intelligence ” platform, frequently citing the FAO as its supply.

“ The to craft new, systemic approaches to food systems that include a diverse array of stakeholders presents opportunities to help sustainably feed the world well to the future. ”

The organization’s frequent sources to “ stakeholders” describes governments, companies, and alleged nongovernmental organizations that are frequently funded by those same companies and governments. All of them are working together on the issue.

For instance, the WEF boasts that it has brought business giants such as Coca-Cola plus Unilever into the fold toward promoting a “ more sustainable future. ”

The Rockefeller Foundation, which recently  released a report on how to “ Totally reset the Table” and “ Transform the U. H. Food System, ”   is also a key gamer.

The WEF’s “ Food Innovation Hubs” around the world are set to become a major part of this global change for better.

Speaking to the World Economic Forum on “ transforming food systems plus land use” at last year’s Davos Agenda Week, Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte  announced   that the Netherlands would web host the “ Global Choosing Secretariat of the World Economic Food Innovation Hubs. ”

The secretariat, he said, “ will certainly connect all other Food Development Hubs” in order to facilitate generating “ the partnerships we need. ”

Neither the WEF nor the particular Rockefeller Foundation responded to requests for comment on their role in Agenda 2030 and on the agricultural policies being pursued around the world.

Other organizations and organizations involved in the push include effective tax-exempt foundations such as the Gates Foundation, the EU-style regional governments proliferating around the world, and various groups funded by them.

Squeezing Farmers— and the Meals Supply 

All over the globe, U. N. SDG-aligned government policies are squeezing farmers— especially smaller, independent producers unable to absorb the added costs of additional regulation and control.

Celebrating U. N. sustainability ideas, recently ousted Sri Lankan President Gotabaya Rajapaksa  announced   at the U. And. COP26 climate summit in 2021 that his government was banning chemical manures and pesticides.

Epoch Times Photo
Law enforcement use water cannons in order to disperse farmers taking part in a good anti-government protest demanding the resignation of Sri Lanka’s President Gotabaya Rajapaksa over the country’s economic crisis in Colombo on July 6, 2022. (-/AFP via Getty Images)

“ Sri Lanka recently restricted the imports of chemical fertilizers, pesticides, and weedicides due to public health concerns, drinking water contamination, soil degradation, and biodiversity impacts, ” Rajapaksa told world leaders, to widespread acclaim.

“ Although opposed simply by entrenched lobbies, this has created opportunities for innovation plus investment into organic farming that will be healthier and more eco friendly in future. ”

In reality, even though they were promptly rolled back, the particular policies produced catastrophic foods shortages, widespread hunger, and eventually a popular revolt that ousted the president and his federal government.

In 2019, the socialist Sri Lankan government also partnered with the U. N. Environment Program to  establish the particular U. N. Global Nitrogen Campaign , which promotes the U. N. -backed policies on nitrogen that are now proliferating worldwide.

In the Netherlands, headquarters for the WEF’s “ Meals Innovation Hub” secretariat, government bodies are imposing nitrogen plans that are expected to decimate the nation’s highly productive agricultural industry. The plans also include common expropriation of farms.

“ The expropriation plans of the cabinet are a downright declaration of battle on the agricultural sector, ” said Dutch Member of Parliament Gideon van Meijeren, of the Forum for Democracy celebration, as cited by Sobre Dagelijkse Standaard. “ Below false pretenses, farmers are being robbed of their land, centuries-old farms are being demolished plus farmers’ families are being totally destroyed. ”

Experts warned of harmful consequences stemming from this kind of sustainability policies including food shortages, skyrocketing prices, interpersonal unrest, and more.

“ You can glimpse the green, sustainable future simply by beholding Holland and Sri Lanka now, ” Bonner Cohen, a senior fellow in the National Center for Open public Policy Research, told The Epoch Times.

And yet, the agenda can be spreading rapidly. Canadian federal government authorities last week announced comparable restrictions on fertilizers and nitrogen after restrictions on energy production were put in place, sparking outrage from provincial officials and farmers.

In Ireland, the uk, and other European nations, various government entities are also working to slash agricultural production below sustainability programs.

Meanwhile, aside from continuing along with policies that pay farmers not to grow food, the Biden administration is wanting to impose WEF-backed “ Environmental, Social, Governance” metrics and reporting on companies with the U. S. Securities plus Exchange Commission.

Farm associations and more than 100 members of Our elected representatives argue that the plan would bankrupt owners of small plus medium-size farms unable to adhere to climate reporting requirements to perform business with public firms, even as the world moves towards widespread food shortages.

In part, experts say the insistence on these sorts of policies is because those impacting them are largely insulated through the damage they are causing.

“ Global elites in government, transnational companies, corporate boardrooms— well symbolized in the WEF— are so swept up in their climate virtue signaling, from which many hope to benefit financially through investments within green energy, that they are gradual to notice that they are completely unattached from reality, ” stated National Center for Public Policy Research’s Cohen, that specializes in environmental issues.

“ Few of those imposing regulations on maqui berry farmers have ever set feet on a farm. By advantage of the power and prosperity these people already have, they are protected from the consequences of the misdirected policies they impose over the rest of the world. That burden is borne by ordinary people around the world, about whom the particular Davos crowd and their own partners in crime know nothing. ”

Small, Independent Farms at Risk: Experts 

Sri Lanka’s disaster offers a preview of what will happen to the United States and European countries if policymakers continue to follow the U. N. sustainability plan, according to  Sterling Burnett, who holds a doctorate in environmental ethics and leads the nonprofit Heartland Institute’s Arthur B. Brown Center on Climate and Environmental Policy.

“ It’s not a war on farming; it’s a war upon small farming and independent farmers, ” he told The Epoch Times. “ It’s a war in support of elite, large-scale agricultural industries. ”

Epoch Times Photo
Farmers gather using their vehicles next to a Germany/Netherlands border sign during a protest on the A1 highway, near Rijssen, on June 29, 2022, against the Dutch Government’s nitrogen plans. (VINCENT JANNINK/ANP/AFP via Getty Images)

However the U. N. SDGs talk about helping “ small-scale food producers, ” Burnett contended that independent farms and ranches are in the Oughout. N. ‘s crosshairs to assist consolidate control over the food provide.

Policymakers are usually “ in the pocket” of major corporate interests which includes Conagra, BlackRock, State Street, Vanguard, and others, he mentioned.

“ They will just as soon have all their small competitors put out associated with business, ” he mentioned, echoing concerns expressed by numerous other experts.

BlackRock CEO Lewis Fink, whose firm manages more money than any other organization in the world, “ wants to enforce his values on businesses using other people’s money, ” Burnett said.

Fink, who serves within the board of the powerful Council on Foreign Relations plus works closely with the WEF, is a key architect of the push to impose “ environmental, social, governance” metrics on U. S. businesses.

“ This is actually the super-rich foisting their ideals on the rest of us, ” said Burnett, pointing to people he says are happy to work with communists on the effort.

“ As far as the planet Economic Forum is concerned, on the phone to have a Great Reset if you don’t reset the food supply, mainly because food is necessary to everybody, ” he said. “ Stalin recognized this: Whoever controls the food controls the people. Like energy. ”

As prices soar plus farmers go bankrupt, major corporations, in league with governments and international agencies, will pick up the pieces.

In the meantime, because seen recently in Sri Lanka, hungry people pushed towards the brink are likely to react.

“ People were not really starving on January six, ” said Burnett, referring to the Jan. 6, 2021, protest and breach in the U. S. Capitol. “ The supply chain problems is happening, shelves are already heading empty, and when people are starving, they will not sit around and do nothing. ”

American Policy Center founder and President Tom DeWeese, a leading expert on and critic of U. In. notions of sustainability, cautioned that the war on farmers was part of a wider agenda to strip people of freedom.

“ Always in the past, when tyrannical forces wanted to rule the world, they built armies and invaded, broke points, killed people, and pressured subjugation, ” DeWeese told The Epoch Times. “ We are now dealing with the diabolical force that has identified a way to get us to voluntarily surrender our protections and help them subjugate us.

“ What could be such a powerful tool? The threat of Environmental Armageddon, ” this individual said, pointing to the climate-change narrative as the prime example.

Citing several U. N. officials and documents, DeWeese says the agenda isn’t to save the climate, but to transform the planet and centralize control of the populace.

Aside from the U. N. as well as the WEF, major companies like Vanguard and BlackRock are working to take over and control the meals supply, he said.

Already, a handful of companies in which those two investment decision firms are top shareholders dominate the global food and drink industry. By taking over the gardening, they will control it all.

“ The objective is to have total control over food production, ” he said, noting that they seek to own all seeds and even grow synthetic meat within facilities already being supported financially by Bill Entrance and other billionaires.

Epoch Times Photo
Bill Gates at an event within New York City, on Nov. 6, 2019. (Mike Cohen/Getty Pictures for The New York Times)

Genetically engineered crops are at the top of the agenda, too.

The U. In., the WEF, and others are usually moving forward with promoting bugs and weeds as meals. Across the Western world, insect protein production facilities are popping up rapidly.

However it gets even darker, DeWeese says.

“ If people are starving, these are much easier to subjugate, ” this individual said, adding that depopulation and control over humanity are on the agenda of global elites for decades.

The “ war upon farmers” also comes among what critics have referred to as a government-backed “ battle on energy” that’s influencing agriculture and virtually every other sector.

This consists of limiting energy exploration, closing down power plants, charging special fees and fees, and other policies that have led to rapidly rising costs throughout the Western world, although not in places such as China.

The experts interviewed by The Epoch Times urged Americans to resist the war on farmers and the U. N. -backed sustainability policies utilizing a variety of means. These include getting involved politically, adopting different shopping habits, finding alternative causes of food such as local maqui berry farmers, and other measures.

Officials at the U. And. didn’t respond to requests designed for comment.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *