Conservatives and lawful experts are warning how the ongoing show trial against Alex Jones is meant to create the precedent to power down any opinions or comments that counters establishment narratives .
Revolver News founder Darrin J. Beattie, constitutional lawyer Robert Barnes, lawyer Mike Cernovich, Human Events editor Jack Posobiec, and others all warned which the Texas defamation trial towards Jones is the first legal salvo against free speech and dissenting views.
“ Regime is certainly thirsting for a precedent in Alex Jones case therefore no one can question official narratives on the internet again, ” Beattie tweeted Wednesday.
Regime is thirsting for a precedent in Alex Jones case so no one can question official narratives on the internet again
— Darren J. Beattie 🌐 (@DarrenJBeattie) August 3, 2022
If they can’t Whilst gary Webb you, they’ll Assange you– and if they can’t Assange you, they’ll Alex Jones you
Genuinely free press is incompatible with the Globalist American Empire
— Darren J. Beattie 🌐 (@DarrenJBeattie) August a few, 2022
“ Alex Jones precedent indicates if you don’t accept the Las vegas shooting explanation, then FBI agents can sue you because you’re calling them liars by implication, ” Cernovich noted. “ Conventional media doesn’t seem to care. They aren’t saying the word on the due process violations in Jones situation. ”
Alex Jones precedent indicates if you don’t accept the Las vegas shooting explanation, then F agents can sue you because you’re calling all of them liars by implication. Traditional media doesn’t seem to treatment. They aren’t saying a word on the due procedure violations in Jones case.
— Cernovich (@Cernovich) Aug 2, 2022
“ The Alex Jones show trial is a examine of what the regime hopes to do to anyone and everyone who doesn’t adapt with The Narratives, ” journalist Jordan Schachtel said.
The Alex Jones show trial is a preview of what the routine intends to do to anybody and everyone who is not going to conform with The Narratives
— Jordan Schachtel @ dossier. substack. com (@JordanSchachtel) Aug 3, 2022
A juror query from #AlexJones trial today: “can we use legal cases like these to stop election deniers”? See where this is going yet?
— Robert Barnes (@barnes_law) July 30, 2022
“ Alex Jones case is to use this as precedent to go after those who contest 2020 political election & any other government disfavored ‘ conspiracy minded’ folks, like everyone who questioned lockdowns, mandates, Covid roots, lies to get us into war, ” Barnes mentioned after noting a juror asked the court if the lawsuit against Jones may “ stop election deniers” in future cases.
New York Times explicity saying it: objective of #AlexJones case is by using it as precedent to visit after those who contest 2020 election & any other government disfavored “conspiracy minded” folks, like everyone who questioned lockdowns, mandates, Covid roots, lies to get us into war. https://t.co/TxBvNJ7IIi
— Robert Barnes (@barnes_law) August 1, 2022
The particular precedent they seek in #AlexJones trial goes way beyond him. As they stated in opening, they look for to establish precedent to drag into court those who discuss topics “important to people” that they think about “misinformation”, creating safe spaces they enforce through bankrupting lawsuits.
— Robert Barnes (@barnes_law) July 26, 2022
The particular left would execute Alex Jones in public if they may find a way to do it. And they’d cheer
— Jack Posobiec 🇺 🇸 (@JackPosobiec) Aug 3, 2022
They didn’t prohibit Alex Jones because of exactly what he got wrong. They will banned him because of what he got right.
— Chase Geiser (@realchasegeiser) Aug 2, 2022
Jan 6 tests, MTG trial, Steve Bannon, Alex Jones, etc we have been no different then the the majority of corrupt countries in the world. No branch has failed more then the judicial branch https://t.co/L64pxQXcGA
— Steven Kolln (@stevenkolln) August two, 2022
Everyone needs to understand that this isn’t about Alex Jones. This is about setting a precedent where you can be personally plus financially ruined by a court of law for not parroting official narratives. https://t.co/8Sixnz6TI4
— Matty (@marvin_gardens) August 3, 2022
In fact , the New York Moments this week confirmed the alarming hypothesis, admitting that the establishment’s goal would be to “ send a sign to other conspiracy purveyors about the cost of online lies ” using the legal program.
Keep in mind, the NYT didn’t consider the Russia collusion hoax , Jussie Smollett’s hate criminal offense hoax , the Nick Sandmann incident, the Kyle Rittenhouse case , or Hunter Biden’s laptop because “ Russian disinformation” to be media-driven lies at all — though all of them demonstrably were at the time.
A verdict in Jones’ Texas defamation show trial is expected later this week.
Truth Social: @WhiteIsTheFury