August 7, 2022

Very conservative Warn Alex Jones Show Trial Sets Precedent Designed for Silencing Dissent Against Institution

“Alex Jones precedent means if you don’t accept the Vegas shooting explanation, then F agents can sue you because you’re calling them liars by implication, inch says Mike Cernovich.

Conservatives and lawful experts are warning how the ongoing show trial against Alex Jones is meant to create the precedent to power down any opinions or comments that counters establishment narratives .

Revolver News founder Darrin J. Beattie, constitutional lawyer Robert Barnes, lawyer Mike Cernovich, Human Events editor Jack Posobiec, and others all warned which the Texas defamation trial towards Jones is the first legal salvo against free speech and dissenting views.

“ Regime is certainly thirsting for a precedent in Alex Jones case therefore no one can question official narratives on the internet again, ” Beattie tweeted Wednesday.

“ Alex Jones precedent indicates if you don’t accept the Las vegas shooting explanation, then FBI agents can sue you because you’re calling them liars by implication, ” Cernovich noted. “ Conventional media doesn’t seem to care. They aren’t saying the word on the due process violations in Jones situation. ”

“ The Alex Jones show trial is a examine of what the regime hopes to do to anyone and everyone who doesn’t adapt with The Narratives, ” journalist Jordan Schachtel said.

“ Alex Jones case is to use this as precedent to go after those who contest 2020 political election & any other government disfavored ‘ conspiracy minded’ folks, like everyone who questioned lockdowns, mandates, Covid roots, lies to get us into war, ” Barnes mentioned after noting a juror asked the court if the lawsuit against Jones may “ stop election deniers” in future cases.

In fact , the New York Moments this week confirmed the alarming hypothesis, admitting that the establishment’s goal would be to “ send a sign to other conspiracy purveyors about the cost of online lies ” using the legal program.

Keep in mind, the NYT didn’t consider the Russia collusion hoax , Jussie Smollett’s hate criminal offense hoax , the Nick Sandmann incident, the Kyle Rittenhouse case , or Hunter Biden’s laptop because “ Russian disinformation” to be media-driven lies at all — though all of them demonstrably were at the time.

A verdict in Jones’ Texas defamation  show trial   is expected later this week.


Twitter: @WhiteIsTheFury

Truth Social: @WhiteIsTheFury

Gettr: @WhiteIsTheFury

Gab: @WhiteIsTheFury

Minds: @WhiteIsTheFury

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *