October 3, 2022

The reason why the “New World Order” Is Impossible to Carry out without Creating Mass Damage

Having acquired all the cash one can spend and all the ability one can wield, the global elite remains capable of deriving perverse psychological satisfaction from doing large-scale acts of wanton destruction.

The events of the last few years have resurrected a recurring worry amongst people mindful of their liberty, property, and personal dignity.

This worry centers around the potential clients of the emergence of the notorious “ new world order, ” a worldwide totalitarian plot hatched by globalist “ elites” intent on destroying the particular surviving remains of free talk, free enterprise, and free of charge thought.

Before asking how justified this kind of worries are, let us note that the “ new world order” narrative typically contains a “ negative” and a “ positive” element. The “ negative” element describes how the global conspirators intend to bring about a worldwide socioeconomic collapse— i. electronic., eliminate the “ old world order” — whereas the particular “ positive” counterpart focuses on the nature of the global totalitarianism will be built on the ashes of destruction. In this connection, it is essential to note that ” new world ” order theorists almost always show the totalitarianism under consideration as being a form of technocratic feudalism with communist undertones, most carefully reminiscent of present-day China along with Western-style “ political correctness” and Malthusian eugenics.

When it comes to the “ negative” part of the narrative involved, one can plausibly argue that definately not consisting of conspiratorial speculation, it really is blatantly unfolding before our eyes. Long-term coordinated global inflationism, persistent “ stimulation spending, ” the energy sector’s “ environmentalist” strangulation, the destructive madness of lockdowns, and the relentless promotion associated with “ woke” insanity obviously seem to be forming a perfect thunderstorm of worldwide planned damage.

Obviously, none of these phenomena are natural, and it does not take a guru to grasp the utterly ruinous consequences of their implementation. Hence, the ongoing devastation from the “ old world order” — today most often referred to as the “ Great Reset” or “ building back better” — smacks of coordinated malevolence, giving rise to well-justified concerns.

The “ positive” part of the new world order task, on the other hand, appears to be more of a bogeyman. This is because the kind of worldwide totalitarianism that theorists usually envision is a praxeological impracticality.

First, comprehensive depopulation, far from centralizing nearly all productive resources in the fingers of the parasitic “ elite, ” would vastly undercut its power by eliminating the majority of the global economy’s productive possible. After all, as noted simply by Julian Simon, it is human beings, with their inventiveness and entrepreneurialism, that constitute the extremely important driving force of financial development. Hence, by performing their Malthusian plans, elite globalists would saw off the branch on which they are seated and eliminate themselves along with their victims.

Second, if the subjugated global population were to be actually enslaved rather than culled within a vast eugenic scheme, then the new world order would collapse in no time as well. This is because a reliable, well-functioning international totalitarianism would have to rely on exceedingly complex technological solutions and massive levels of high-quality capital goods.

However , armies of literal slaves cannot generate or maintain such products, nor devise and carry out such solutions. After all, slaves are notoriously unproductive people, since they have no means and no incentive to invest in their abilities, skills, contacts, and contrasting resources. Furthermore, it is impossible that the masters would carry out these tasks, since they would certainly constitute a very small upper crust.

Third, if one were to claim that the new world order can successfully operate based on highly advanced artificial intelligence options, then, once again, the organic question is who would devise and oversee the relevant infrastructure. The elite puppet masters, regardless of their cunning, would be too few to accomplish this task. Masses of slaves, as pointed out previously, would be singularly ill-equipped to handle this feat.

Finally, a potential group of “ semielite” middle management would certainly also be of no use in this context. If today we are viewing how a full-blooded totalitarianism of the sort could look, people of this caste would have to become even more thoroughly indoctrinated in the “ woke” ideology under such a system. And given that this ideology can be summed up as a particularly deranged revolt against the nature of truth, it is a uniquely bad fit for technologically demanding environments.

Lastly, it ought to be pointed out that the new world purchase would be even more vulnerable to the Misesian calculation problem compared to its “ classical” totalitarian predecessors. After all, political energy and economic decision-making capacity would have to be much more seriously concentrated in the hands of the minuscule oligarchy than it had been in the former Soviet bloc.

And while for some time, these countries’ rulers could maintain a semblance associated with economic rationality by determining in terms of external prices and by tolerating the existence of internal black markets, no such solutions would be available in a global dictatorship of technocratic omnisurveillance. Hence, it turns out that such a dictatorship is a praxeological absurdity— a system that might look very menacing on paper but that is nothing more than a psychopathic pipe dream.

Thus, one has to wonder about the motives behind the globalist clique’s crazy destruction of the present socioeconomic order. Surely, its members are cunning enough to realize the insurmountable nature of the challenges mentioned above. What, then, inspires their ruinous mania, if there is no additional money plus power to be gained?

The only satisfactory solution is thoroughly chilling: it seems that having acquired all the cash one can spend and all the strength one can wield, the global top notch remains capable of deriving perverse psychological satisfaction from engaging in large-scale acts of wanton destruction. In other words, its representatives do not seem to mind doing a spectacular suicide so long as this is a side effect of a vastly a lot more spectacular democide.

While the realization that the ” new world ” order is a logically incoherent phantasmagoria might be soothing, the particular corollary awareness that the correct goal of the ongoing worldwide ruination is no less crazy should keep all right-minded people sober and watchful. Hence, even if one is not  an enthusiast of the rapidly disintegrating “ old world order, ” one can steadfastly oppose the evil machinations of those responsible for that order’s dissolution.

Ludwig von Mises’s personal slogan (also adopted by the Mises Institute) is instructive: “ Do not give in to bad but proceed ever more boldly against it. ”

Alex Jones: The Human Supremacist

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *