October 2, 2022

Serious State Slams Free Talk Pioneer Alex Jones

In prosecuting Jones, the Deep State delivered a good unadulterated message to people who dare question standard narratives: no longer will we all simply cancel and deplatform you, we’ll sue you into bankruptcy and poverty

I have been asked in comments and emails to share our thoughts on the crippling judgement rendered against Infowars owner and free speech master Alex Jones.

In  Silence of the Lambs , Hannibal Lector asks Clarice Starling of the killer Buffalo Expenses, “ What does he perform, this man you seek? ” to which Starling solutions ascertainably, “ He kills women. ”

“ No! ” Lector replies emphatically. “ Which is incidental. ” And highlights that Bill’s killings are simply just a byproduct of their true yearning— to covet.

Alex Jones was incidental, an incidental casualty in the Deep State’s war on free conversation, its covetous desire to quiet all discussion that contradicts White House talking factors and the dogmatic view associated with mainstream media. The farcical trial was never regarding Alex Jones, not really, and certainly not Sandy Hook. This could’ve been you or me. But Jones, the greatest and wealthiest kid in the room, made an delicious target— his fame and influence in the free conversation community put crosshairs in the back, of which he was aware.

In prosecuting Jones, the Strong State delivered an unadulterated message to persons who else dare question official narratives: no longer will we simply cancel and deplatform you, we’ll sue you into bankruptcy and poverty.

The Deep California’s case against Jones has been open and shut. He was found guilty prior to setting foot in court room. He wasn’t leaving courtroom unscathed. Even if Jones’ horrible legal representation had amazingly produced evidence, a cigarette smoking gun, that plainly plus unequivocally proved beyond other exclusions that crisis actors were used at Sandy Hook, the court would certainly still have found him responsible for damages.

We have seen articles trouncing Jones’ defense team, and, indeed, his lawyers were among the most incompetent lawyers imaginable. Exactly what defense attorney worth his salt “ accidentally” sends the prosecution privileged information? In the end, though, Jones might have hired OJ’s ‘ fantasy team’ and still been found guilty, not because he committed a crime but because of the cacophonous message that today reverberates through the free speech community. The Deep Condition, the liberal lunatics, and the “ woke” masses will certainly tolerate no dissension. Conform or else. Don’t question the particular authority.

Regarding Jones the most immediate authorities were a slanderous prosecutor as well as the most biased judge in the history of the American legal system. They worked together, playing off each other while overruling almost every objection raised by Jones’ lawyers. The prosecution was allowed to enter evidence statements Jones made opposing Covid-19 lockdowns. Just how exactly does Covid relate to Sandy Hook? Jones’ lawyers asked that question but were shutdown by a Strong State judge.

In short, Jones was mistakenly maligned for practicing his constitutionally protected right to totally free speech. He expressed opinions and views, and he certainly didn’t kill anyone within Sandy Hook.

I hope a court associated with appeals nullifies the common sense against him, but I am not holding my breath, and neither should Alex.


RRN is an independent publisher that relies on reader support.   Help us achieve our Annual goal.   We fight for reality and freedom of the press in an oppressed society. We use GiveSendGo, a Christian-based fundraising company, through which to collect donations. Please do not give your hard-earned money to sites or channels that copy/paste our intellectual property or home. We spend countless hours vetting, researching, and writing. Thank you. Every dollar helps.
GiveSendGo Fundraising Hyperlink .

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *