October 6, 2022

Untested Bivalent COVID Jab Becoming Rolled Out

Last week, U. K. became first country to approve Moderna’s new bivalent COVID booster — Spikevax bivalent — which contains mRNA codes for original Wuhan strain spike protein and Omicron BA. 1 subvariant.


  • Aug 15, 2022, the U. K. became the first nation to approve Moderna’s new bivalent COVID booster — Spikevax bivalent — which contains mRNA that unique codes for the original Wuhan stress spike protein and the Omicron BA. 1 subvariant
  • The approval from the new booster comes on the heels of complaints about insufficient demand for the shots. Moderna recently threw away 30 million doses of its authentic COVID jab, as no one wanted them, and the Oughout. S., has tossed 82. 1 million COVID jab doses in the trash for the same reason
  • The particular Spikevax bivalent shot has already been out of date, as both pressures included are no longer in circulation anywhere in the world
  • In the U. S., infections are currently caused by the BA. four, BA. 5 and PURSE. 2 . 12. 1 variants of Omicron. In Europe, Omicron BA. 2, BA. 4 and BA. five are the current “ versions of concern. ” BA. one is on the list of “ de-escalated variants, ” meaning it might be of no concern either because it’s either not in circulation, or since it doesn’t cause severe sickness
  • Coronaviruses mutate very rapidly, and when a person vaccinate against a rapidly mutating virus, you encourage it to mutate actually faster, and to develop immune-evading properties. This is what we’ve been witnessing since the beginning of the COVID jab campaign, and outdated, leaky bivalent boosters may get worse the situation further

August 15, 2022, the U. K. grew to become the first country to say yes to Moderna’s new bivalent COVID booster, which contains both the original concoction and mRNA to target Omicron variants. The booster has also been submitted just for approval with authorities in Australia, Canada and the EU, and there’s every reason in order to suspect it’ll be submitted to the U. S. Food and Medication Administration as well. As reported by Sky News: 1

“ The booster dose, known as ‘ Spikevax bivalent Original/Omicron, ‘ contains 25 micrograms of Omicron vaccine and twenty five micrograms of original coronavirus vaccine …

The Shared Committee on Vaccination and Immunization (JCVI) has said the vaccine will be available to these aged 18 and over as part of the UK’s autumn booster program. Health Secretary Steve Barclay said those qualified will be contacted from earlier September. ”

More Than 100 Million Doses Have Been Removed

The authorization of the new booster comes right on the heels associated with widespread complaints about lack of requirement for the shots. Moderna lately had to throw away 30 mil doses of its original COVID jab, as there was simply no demand for them. 2

“ We have a big demand issue, ” Moderna CEO Sté phane Bancel said in May 2022 during a panel debate at the World Economic Forum’s meeting in Davos, Swiss. 3   Similarly, in the U. S., pharmacies, states and federal government agencies have tossed 82. 1 million COVID jab doses in the trash, as well as for the same reason. 4

Bivalent Booster Is Already Out of Date

Moderna’s bivalent booster is said to “ give a strong immune response against the Omicron BA. 1 version as well as the original 2020 Wuhan strain, ” which, for the record, is extinct with no longer in circulation all over the world. BA. 1 is now rarely ever found, either.

The graph 5, 6   below, from the U. T. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, shows the problem ratios of common versions. As you can see, in the U. Ersus., infections are now caused by the BA. 4, BA. 5 and BA. 2 . 12. 1 variants of Omicron. 7   So , this booster includes two strains that not necessarily even relevant anymore.

The situation is exactly the same in Europe, where Omicron BA. 2, BA. 4 plus BA. 5 are the present “ variants of concern. ” BA. 1 isn’t a “ variant of interest, ” which is the next-lower categorization. It’s on the list of “ de-escalated variants, ” which is depending on a variant meeting a number of of the following criteria: 8

“ (1) the variant is no longer circulating, (2) the variant continues to be circulating for a long time without any effect on the overall epidemiological situation, (3) scientific evidence demonstrates how the variant is not associated with any concerning properties. ”

In short, BA. 1 is of no concern in Europe possibly, as it’s not in blood flow and/or because it doesn’t result in severe illness. The same applies to the original Wuhan strain, that has long since mutated out of existence.

Vaccinating Against Rapidly Mutating Infections Is a Bad Idea

Coronaviruses mutate quite rapidly in general, and the mRNA jabs are based on a surface area protein (the spike protein), which is the most rapidly mutating portion of the entire virus. What happens when you vaccinate against a rapidly mutating virus? You encourage it to mutate even faster, and to develop immune-evading properties.

This is what we’ve been witnessing since the beginning of the COVID jab campaign, and at this point, there’s no hope of ever catching plan the virus. What’s worse, whilst variants have so far progressed into milder strains, these are in fact gaining the ability to avoid antibodies, and could theoretically change course to become more pathogenic. 9

This is particularly genuine when a vaccine is “ leaky, ” meaning keep in mind that fully prevent infection (which none of the COVID shots do). Just like when you overuse an antibiotic that fails to eradicate the bacteria, that allows antibiotic-resistant bacteria to grow, overuse of a leaky vaccine can pressure a malware to become more lethal. 10, 11

BA. 4 and BA. 5 are the most resistant to date, with HANDBAG. 5 circumventing the immune systems even of those with natural immunity. twelve   Fortunately, it will not appear to cause severe disease in most people.

The take-home here is that will had natural immunity been allowed to take place without these jabs, the pandemic would be as well as reinfections near-nonexistent. Instead, we are going to now in a pandemic of the vaccinated, with the vast majority associated with serious COVID infections happening among those who have been jabbed. 13, 14

We know that Pfizer had been aware of this possibility, because “ vaccine-associated enhanced disease (VAED)” is listed as an “ Important Potential Risk” in Table 5 upon page 11 of a document called “ 5. 3 or more. 6 Cumulative Analysis of Post-Authorization Adverse Event Reports. ” 15   This document had been part of the FOIA required plus court-ordered batch released with the FDA April 1, 2022.

How Long May the Bivalent Booster Guard You?

According to Moderna, the bivalent Spikevax “ demonstrates potent normalizing antibody response against Omicron subvariants BA. 4 plus BA. 5. ” 16   They will made the same claim for your original COVID jab, back in January 2021, seventeen   and by Aug 2021, they admitted the neutralizing antibodies generated survived only six months after the 2nd dose. 18

How long can the bivalent jab “ be effective” (and I personally use that term loosely)? To know, but the way things are usually trending, six months would probably become the max. In Germany, residents must now get a booster every three months to meet the criteria as “ fully vaccinated, ” 19   as rapidly waning immunity has become accepted reality, and that’s probably where we’ve headed.

Germans who haven’t received all their boosters will be subject to cover up mandates and other COVID limitations this fall. This, despite deep criticism from companies tasked with confirming their customers’ status. As reported by the Rise Align Ignite Reclaim (RAIR) foundation: 20

“ Businesses have voiced great concern about further regulatory turmoil in the struggling economy. ‘ The plans are simply not feasible, ‘ said the general manager of the German Resort and Restaurant Association (Dehoga), Ingrid Hartges, the Handelsblatt. ‘ We cannot constantly check whether our visitors are vaccinated, recovered, or even tested. ‘

These people are free from the obligation to wear masks in restaurants or occasions under certain circumstances — if the vaccination, for example , is within the last three months. ‘ However, you can’t tell from the guest in the restaurant what standing they have, ‘ says Hartges. ‘ Like when he or she goes to the bathroom — should the staff always ask if your dog is vaccinated? ‘ she mentioned. ‘ That’s nonsense. ‘”

Bivalent Jab Will Not Go through Additional Testing

It’s important to realize that these “ next-gen” boosters will not undergo any additional safety testing. 21, 22   They’re being rolled away under a new fast-track regular where ingredients can be substituted without additional testing.

This is the standard protocol for seasonal flu vaccines. However , we’re now using an entirely new type plus essentially untested technology. There’s no telling whether variations within the spike mRNA being injected might produce vastly different side effects. They could potentially have got differing toxicities, but that isn’t being investigated.

Also, remember that the “ efficacy” they’re referring to is just based on measurements of antibody titers, which tells us absolutely nothing, really, about its capability to prevent infection, severity associated with illness or death. Exactly why?

Because antibodies form only a part of your immune response, and they’re not even the most important. It is far more most likely that your innate immune system — your first line of defense — will destroy a pathogen before your adaptive defense mechanisms even has a chance to respond and create antibodies. 23

It is important to understand that no vaccine improves your innate immune reaction. All vaccines are ever able to do is address your adaptive humoral immune system and create antibodies. Your innate immune system has T tissues that can directly kill viruses. If you happen to have a vigorous Capital t cell response, you’ll be safeguarded even if your antibodies are low. So , antibodies are certainly not a necessary measure of immunity.

Antibody titer levels are what’s called a “ surrogate outcome. ” It’s a substitute for actual medical outcome. But it’s suggests equivalent, no matter how much the powers in control want it to become. Antibody titers may be higher, but in the real world, more individuals may end up in the hospital plus die — either through the infection or from the chance. In short, high antibody titer is not a guarantee of performance — and it tells us absolutely nothing about safety.

CIA-Backed Upstart to Produce Moderna’s Bivalent mRNA

The complete absence of testing continuing to move forward is all the more concerning considering who’s manufacturing the RNA for Moderna’s now-bivalent enhancer. In a recent Unlimited Hangout article, 24   investigative journalist Whitney Webb reveals the hereditary material for the reformulated enhancer is being exclusively manufactured by Nationwide Resilience, a relative newcomer along with significant ties to Oughout. S. intelligence agencies.

Its board associated with directors include In-Q-Tel CEO Chris Darby, who is also on the board of directors of the CIA Officers Memorial Foundation, and former FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION commissioner and Pfizer panel member Dr . Scott Gottlieb. Not surprisingly, National Resilience guarantees to successfully lead its customers through the government regulatory process. As reported by Webb: 25

“ National Resilience started … in November 2020, and … plans to ‘ reinvent biomanufacturing’ and democratize access to medicines, ‘ namely gene therapies, fresh vaccines and other ‘ medications of tomorrow’ …

Within April 2021, National Resilience  acquired   Ology Bioservices Inc., which usually had received a $37 million contract from the US military the previous November to build up an advanced anti-COVID-19 monoclonal antibody treatment. This acquisition furthermore provided National Resilience using its first Biosafety Level three or more (BSL-3) laboratory and the ability to manufacture cell and gene therapies, live viral vaccines and vectors and oncolytic viruses.

Despite being in the earliest stages of developing its ‘ revolutionary’ manufacturing features, National Resilience entered into  a partnership   with the Government associated with Canada in July associated with last year. Per that agreement, the Canadian government programs to invest CAD 199. two million (about $154. nine million) into National Resilience’s Ontario-based subsidiary, Resilience Biotechnologies Inc.

Most of those money are destined for use in expanding the Ontario facility that Resilience acquired last March and which is now manufacturing the mRNA for Moderna’s COVID-19 products … Recently, in 2022, the company provides announced a  couple of new clients   – Takeda, Opus Genetics and the US Department of Defense …

Considering Moderna’s history and Resilience’s connections, there might be more to this partnership that meets the eye and worried members of the public would do well to keep a very close eye upon Resilience, its partnerships, and the products it is manufacturing.

Given that we now live in a world where government regulatory decisions over the approval of medicines are usually increasingly influenced by business press releases and normal regulatory procedures have fallen with the wayside for being too ‘ slow, ‘ there is probably little scrutiny of the hereditary material that Resilience produces for the ‘ medicines associated with tomorrow. ‘

This seems to be already true for Moderna’s recently retooled COVID-19 shot, as there has been no indie examination of the new genetic sequence of mRNA used in the Omicron-specific vaccine candidate or its effects on the body of a human in the short, medium or even long term.

For those who are skeptical from the outsized role that intelligence-linked companies are playing in the attempted technological ‘ revolution’ within the medical field, it is best to consider Resilience’s role in the upcoming drop vaccination campaign and in long term pandemic and public wellness scenarios before trying the ‘ futuristic’ products. ”

Was COVID Jab Intentionally Flawed?

Video Link

In a June 2022 interview with British stereo presenter Maajid Nawaz, Erina Yeadon, Ph. D., a former vice-president and chief scientific adviser for Pfizer plus founder/CEO of the biotech firm Ziarco (now owned simply by Novartis), explained why he believes the COVID jabs were intentionally made to end up being harmful and to prolong the pandemic.

First of all, it’s been known for more than 10 years that spike protein causes adverse effects in humans, 26   which means this could not be a design error. It must have been intentional.

“ By choosing the particular spike protein on which in order to base COVID-19 shots, researchers picked a protein that a) was known to be toxic to humans and b) produced an inferior immune reaction (compared to other parts of the virus). On top of that, spike protein mutates rapidly, which destroys any protection the shot provides shortly after it’s given. ”

As Yeadon described, when making a vaccine, you need to be very careful about which section of the virus you use, as certain parts are more toxic and a few provoke better immune reactions than others. “ What you will do is ask, ‘ What’s the toxicity of the bit I’m going to give a person? ‘” he said.

Seeing how scientists have known for at least 10 years that spike protein from related viruses causes blood clots through at least 2 different mechanism, the choice to make use of mRNA that programs your cells to make spike protein raised a warning flag from the start.

Absolutely nothing About the COVID Jabs Is practical

In addition to that, 90% of the immune response you receive from natural COVID an infection is in response to other parts of the virus, not the spike protein. Put another way, contact with spike protein mounts a substandard immune response. If you’re seeking to make an effective vaccine, didn’t you choose a part of the virus that mounts the best and most powerful immune response?

By choosing the spike protein on which to base COVID-19 shots, scientists picked a protein that a) was known to be toxic in order to humans and b) created an inferior immune response (compared to other parts of the virus).

On top of that, spike protein mutates rapidly, which usually destroys any protection the particular shot provides shortly after that it is given. As noted by Yeadon, 27   “ What you should do is pick the bits of the virus that’s genetically most stable, ” but they didn’t do that. Perhaps you should? The end result is a seemingly never-ending series of boosters, and according to Yeadon, that may have been the master plan from the start.

As though all of that weren’t enough, the particular spike protein is also much like a variety of human proteins, which can trigger your body to attach an inappropriate immune reaction against your own proteins. To put it differently, it can cause autoimmune illness. Yet, scientists chose the spike protein anyway — though it violated all of the accepted guidelines for creating a safe and effective item.

Collusion to Cause Harm

Yeadon believes the decision to make use of spike protein was not an error at all. He believes it had been intentionally chosen because it has all of those ill effects. He informed Nawaz:

“ Again, you deselect things that are poisonous in their own right, you select things that are genetically steady, and you pick things that are usually most different from humans …

But guess what? Moderna recommendations spike protein and so will Pfizer, and AstraZeneca, plus Johnson & Johnson. So , I put it to you, colleagues, any scientists out there or simply logical people. How the terrible would they pick [the spike protein]?

No team I had been ever part of would ever have picked bloody spike protein for this vaccine. And you know what? If we did, and have competing groups, we would not, all four of us, associated with same mistake. Not possible. They have collusion and malfeasance. The particular did it on purpose, knowing it will hurt you. ”

Sources for Those Injured by the COVID Jabs

In case you got one or more jabs plus suffered an injury, first and foremost, never ever take another COVID enhancer, another mRNA gene treatment shot or regular vaccine. You need to end the assault on your system. The same applies to anyone who has taken one or more COVID jabs and had the good fortune of not experiencing debilitating side effects.

Your health may still be impacted long lasting, so don’t take any more shots. When it comes to treatment, there are still more questions than solutions, and most doctors are naive about what to do — in part because they never bothered to provide early treatment for COVID and therefore don’t understand how various medicines and supplements effect the spike protein.

So far, it seems like many of the treatments that worked towards severe COVID-19 infection furthermore help ameliorate adverse effects from the jab. This makes sense, since the toxic, most damaging section of the virus is the spike protein, and that’s what your whole is producing if you got the particular jab.

2 doctors who have started tackling the treatment of COVID jab injuries in earnest include Dr . Michelle Perro ( DrMichellePerro. com ), whom  I’ve interviewed on this topic , plus Dr . Pierre Kory ( DrPierreKory. com ).

Both agree that eliminating the spike protein your body is now continuously producing is a major task. Perro’s preferred fix for this is hydroxychloroquine, while Kory typically uses ivermectin. These two drugs bind and therefore facilitate the removal of spike protein.

Kory furthermore believes there may be ways to boost the immune system to allow it to degrade and eventually remove the surge from your cells naturally, as time passes. One of the strategies he recommends for this is  TRE (time restricted eating) , which stimulates  autophagy , a natural cleaning procedure that eliminates damaged, misfolded and toxic proteins. An additional strategy that can do the same would be sauna therapy.

As a member of the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Treatment Alliance (FLCCC), Kory assisted develop the FLCCC’s post-vaccine treatment protocol called  I-RECOVER . Since the process is continuously updated as more data become available, your best bet is to download the latest version straight from the FLCCC website in covid19criticalcare. com 28   (hyperlink to the correct page provided above).

Other Helpful Treatments and Remedies

In previous posts, I’ve also covered numerous treatments and remedies that can be helpful for COVID jab accidental injuries, such as:

• Hyperbaric oxygen therapy, specially in cases involving stroke, heart attack, autoimmune diseases and/or neurodegenerative disorders. To learn more, see “ Hyperbaric Therapy — A Vastly Underused Therapy Modality . ”

• Lower your Omega-6 intake. Linoleic acid is usually consumed in amounts ten times of ideal in well over 95% of the populace, and contributes to massive oxidative stress that impairs your own immune response. Seed natural oils and processed foods have to be diligently avoided. You can review my  previous posting   for more information.

• Time Restricted Eating will go a long way to diminish insulin resistance and improve metabolic flexibility. Most people consume more than 12 hours a day. The ideal window for most most people are 16 to 18 hours associated with continuous fasting with minimum meal at least three hrs before bed. If you are obese, it’s best to shoot for 18 hours; if you’re of normal bodyweight, 16 hours.

• Pharmaceutical grade methylene blue, which improves mitochondrial respiration and aid in mitochondrial repair. At 15 to 80 milligrams a day for all those suffering from long-haul COVID could go a long way toward solving some of the fatigue many suffer post-jab. Methylene blue is actually the parent molecule to get hydroxychloroquine and has been utilized to treat malaria since 1890.

It may also be helpful in acute strokes. The main contraindication is if you have a G6PD deficiency (a hereditary genetic condition), in which case you should not make use of methylene blue at all. To find out more, see “ The Surprising Health Benefits of Methylene Blue . ”

• Near-infrared lighting, as it triggers production associated with melatonin in your mitochondria 29   to need it most. By wetmopping up reactive oxygen species, it too helps improve mitochondrial function and restoration. Natural sunlight is 54. 3% infrared radiation, 30   which means this treatment is available for free. For additional information, see “ What you ought to Know About Melatonin . ”

–   Sources plus References

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *