A Romanian person in the European Parliament kept Big Pharma executives’ ft to the fire regarding their faulty Covid vaccines throughout a meeting with the EU’s Covid Commission Monday.
Addressing numerous issues with the EU’s rushed Covid vaccine approval, Romanian MEP Cristian Terhes questioned regardless of whether AstraZeneca and Moderna depended on data from the Chinese government when decoding the full DNA sequence of the trojan, as well as whether anyone died during phase three clinical trials involving human check subjects.
Must Watch: Romanian MEP Cristian Terhes blasts Noua and AstraZeneca in Western Parliament COVID Commission.
Bombshell revelations made by Moderna and AstraZeneca in the European Parliament’s COVID Commission after questions asked by Cristian Terheș. pic. twitter. com/TzwK9T07W4
— The Canadian Independent (@canindependent) September 7, 2022
“ Have you tested if the vaccines are stopping the spread of the virus or not? ” Terhes pointedly asked.
“ Because the data clearly shows that your products are not stopping the particular spread of this virus, ” he added.
The MEP also instructed questions specifically to Moderna CEO Stephane Bancel, inquiring how the company was able to test their vaccines several years before the Covid crisis began, and why the vaccines had been forced on EU residents despite an apparent coordinated lack of transparency.
“ You mentioned right here that there are some secrets, or some confidential information in these contracts that should protect your own interests, ” Terhes informed Bancel. “ Now the question that I addressed to you: what about the interests of us and the interests of the European citizens? Because this is how a few of the pages from the contract among Moderna and the European fee is showing. [Holds up a series of documents with large portions redacted from public view.]”
“ Therefore I’m asking you, do you think this is fair to all of us to talk about these vaccines, to talk about boosters, to talk about medical products when all of us don’t know the clauses of those contracts? ” Terhes requested.
He furthermore asked the Moderna TOP DOG, “ When are you going to completely publish the contracts they had both with the European commission rate and with the member states of the European Union? ”
“ Another question, the issue of liabilities, ” Terhes continuing, additionally touching on the lack of liability and compensation for reported vaccine side effects. “ You had been asked by our colleague here about the liabilities and also you avoided to answer this question, so my issue to you is: why are a person pushing the liabilities around the states and on the people who also receive these vaccines and might have, and I’m stating ‘ might have’ negative effects, while you get all the income? Nevertheless the bivalent boosters. ”
Terhes furthermore inquired if Bancel thought it was fair to EUROPEAN citizens “ to be vaccinated with some medical products which were not properly tested, delete word at all tested in human beings? ”
Bancel replied that Moderna had indeed relied on information from the Chinese government.
Here’s his reaction to the question of liability:
“ Regarding the liability designed for adverse effects, as all the producers did, we wanted, the particular governments wanted the fast approval of a vaccine. And therefore, for a conditional approval, it had been important that we were given several guarantees in terms of damages, due to the fact we couldn’t have no guarantees. They wanted the shot quickly. They didn’t give manufacturers time to have extensive studies because of the nature of a pandemic. “
AstraZeneca Executive Vice President Iskra Reic also responded that EU states signed on to the liability and indemnity clause in order to speed vaccine approval:
“ When it comes to liability with regard to adverse effects I think… I’m sorry to hear that you’re not happy with all the answers you’re getting, but I think we’re here to become as transparent as possible.
“ The liability and indemnity clause was discussed plus agreed with many governments around the world because everyone wanted to observe how we could speed up the production and delivery of vaccines.
“ And again, as I pointed out earlier, this is considered regular practice in emergency circumstances, and equally the [practice] that protects and supports everyone to advance forward with the greatest velocity and to do the best we are able to in terms of producing and production [vaccines].
“ In addition , liability and compensation are usually included in a clause which is valid/applicable only for doses contracted during the pandemic. ”
In February, Terhes also lambasted Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau over his authoritarian response to the Freedom Convoy, calling him a “ tyrant” and a “ dictator. ”
He or she was also an outspoken earlier advocate against Covid lockdowns .