YouTube regularly censors videos, demonetizes creators, and introduces new censorship rules. Yet inside a recent interview, YouTube TOP DOG Susan Wojcicki claimed the fact that platform wants to enable “ as much free speech even as we possibly can have. ”
Wojcicki produced the comments during an interview with Indonesian journalist Najwa Shihab whenever she was asked for YouTube’s view on governments using rules to curtail free conversation. In her response, Wojcicki framed YouTube as a free of charge speech champion.
“ In general, we want to enable political speech. So… when we do get requests that will involve suppression of politics speech, that’s a place where… we’re very… hesitant or resistant to removing it, ” Wojcicki said.
She continued by adding the caveat that “ every case depends on what’s happening” before making an even bolder claim about YouTube’s supposed free conversation values:
“ We want to enable people to express their own points of view plus enable as much free conversation as we possibly can have. ”
Wojcicki followed up by claiming that YouTube also compares for free speech against non-democratically elected governments.
“ If you, for example , have a non-democratically elected government and they’re asking us to remove content material that would be suppressing free speech of people who are being persecuted in some way, that’s a place… where it would be harder for us to… remove that content, ” Wojcicki said. “ We would keep it up. ”
Shihab pressed Wojcicki on her purported free speech stance by asking the Youtube . com CEO whether she feels in censorship. Shihab recommended that censorship could be counterproductive when it comes to fighting “ misinformation” and that having a free movement of information rather than censorship is actually a better solution.
Despite claiming that YouTube wants to enable as much free of charge speech as possible earlier within the interview, Wojcicki responded to this question by saying: “ There are lines that we draw that we think… don’t seem sensible for us to have on our system. ”
The particular YouTube CEO said that adult content was one of the first types that YouTube banned since allowing it would have transformed the nature of YouTube. However , she continued by describing other vaguer categories of articles that are banned to conciliate advertisers:
“ If we have a wide range of content that is seen as unwanted or not supporting society or not being responsible, we’ll also see pullback from our advertising community. So… we want to do the right thing yet we also as a company, I believe, operate very differently than say the internet in general where people can go plus post their information. ”
That isn’t the first time Wojcicki and other high-ranking YouTube executives have attemptedto frame YouTube as a free of charge speech platform.
Last year, Wojcicki was given a free expression prize from a pro-First Amendment group at an honours ceremony sponsored by Youtube . com. She also previously said that celebrating freedom of speech is a “ core value” at YouTube . And earlier this year, YouTube’s Main Product Officer, Neal Mohan, claimed that will YouTube is an “ open up platform” where anyone can share ideas “ with no gatekeepers. ”
Despite these states from its executives, YouTube’s actions tell a different story. In Q2 2022, YouTube removed more than a million video clips for violating its far-reaching rules close to “ hate speech, ” “ harassment, ” “ harmful” content, and “ misinformation. ” This quarter, YouTube has continued in order to censor popular makers and journalists and update its censorship rules .