The Director of the Oughout. S. Centers for Illness Control and Prevention (CDC) has acknowledged publicly initially that the agency gave fake information about its COVID-19 shot safety monitoring.
Dr . Rochelle Walensky admitted that her agency falsely claimed it was carrying out robust security monitoring in 2021 and that it only actually did so from March 2022 – but it still will not release the full data. The Epoch Times has the story .
Dr . Rochelle Walensky, the particular [CDC’s] Movie director, said in a letter made public on September twelfth that the CDC did not analyse certain types of adverse event reports whatsoever in 2021, despite the company previously saying it were only available in February 2021.
“ CDC performed PRR analysis between March 25th 2022, through July 31st 2022, ” Walensky mentioned. “ CDC also recently addressed a previous statement made to the Epoch Times in order to clarify PRR were not operate between February 26th 2021 to September 30th 2021. ”
Walensky’s agency had promised in several documents , beginning in early 2021, to perform a type of analysis called Proportional Confirming Ratio (PRR) on reviews submitted to the Vaccine Undesirable Event Reporting System, which it helps manage.
But the agency stated in June that it did not perform PRRs. It also said that performing all of them was “ outside th[e] agency’s purview”.
But just days later, the CDC mentioned Su was wrong.
Walensky’s new letter, dated Sept 2nd and sent on September 6th to Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis. ), shows that Walensky is aware that her agency gave fake information. Walensky’s letter integrated no explanation of exactly why that happened.
The Epoch Times reports that the CDC has “ still not really provided the results of the PRRs that were performed”, either in order to itself or to Senator Manley. The FDA, which has conducted “ Empirical Bayesian data mining on Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System reports” also refused to supply any of the leads to the Epoch Instances .
Dr . Walensky claimed in her letter that Empirical Bayesian (EB) data mining much more reliable, and that the PRR results “ were generally consistent with EB data exploration, revealing no additional unexpected safety signals”.
Senator Johnson replied that without the data “ the American people, the public cannot verify your assertion”.
Worth reading in full .