October 3, 2022

Illegal Collusion Between Government plus Big Tech Exposed

Federal officials in the Biden administration have held private and illegal censorship group meetings with social media companies for you to suppress Americans’ First Escalator clause rights to free dialog

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

  • Federal officials in the Biden administration have held secret and illegal censorship conferences with social media companies to suppress Americans’ First Amendment rights to free speech, and to ban or deplatform those who share unauthorized views about COVID and vaccines
  • The evidence with this comes out of a lawsuit through the New Civil Liberties Alliance and the attorneys general of Missouri and Louisiana (Eric Schmitt and Jeff Landry) against President Biden, filed in May 2022
  • Monthly, a Unified Techniques Group (USG) meeting took place — and may still be taking place — between a wide variety of government agencies and Big Technology companies, during which topics to become censored and suppressed were/are discussed
  • Censored topics included stories regarding COVID jab refusal, especially those involving military refusals and consequences thereof, criticism against COVID restrictions plus their effects on mental health, posts talking about examining positive for COVID after getting the jab, personal stories of COVID jab negative effects, including menstrual irregularities, plus worries about vaccine passports becoming mandatory
  • Discovery documents obtained so far have identified more than 50 federal employees across fifteen federal agencies, engaged in illegal censorship activities. Emails from your strategic communications and advertising firm Reingold also shows outside consultants were employed to manage the government’s collusion with social media to break Americans’ Constitutional free talk rights

In a September 1, 2022, article, 1   the Post Millennial reveals how federal officials in the Biden administration possess held secret censorship meetings with social media companies to suppress Americans’ First Variation rights to free talk, and to ban or deplatform those who share unauthorized sights about COVID and vaccines.

The evidence for this comes out of a lawsuit 2   brought by the New Civil Liberties Alliance and the attorneys general associated with Missouri and Louisiana (Eric Schmitt and Jeff Landry) against President Biden, submitted in May 2022.

During the discovery process, the plaintiffs sought to identify “ all meetings with any kind of social media platform relating to content modulation and/or misinformation, ” which is how we now realize that such illegal meetings do, in fact , take place.

Illegal Collusion to Reduce Free Speech

Monthly, a Unified Methods Group (USG) meeting took place — and may still be occurring — between a wide variety of federal government agencies and Big Tech companies, during which topics to be censored and suppressed were/are discussed.

Censored topics included stories including COVID jab refusal, especially those involving military refusals and consequences thereof, criticism against COVID restrictions plus their effects on mental health, posts talking about examining positive for COVID after getting the jab, personal stories of COVID jab unwanted effects, including menstrual irregularities, and worries about vaccine given becoming mandatory. several   According to the Brand new Civil Liberties Alliance: 4

“ … scores of federal officials … have secretly communicated with social-media platforms to censor and suppress private conversation federal officials disfavor. This unlawful enterprise has been wildly successful.

Under the First Amendment, the federal government may not police private speech nor choose winners and losers in the market of ideas. But which is precisely what the government has done — and is still doing — on a massive scale not really previously divulged.

Multiple agencies’ communications demonstrate that this federal government has exerted remarkable pressure on social-media businesses — pressure to which businesses have repeatedly bowed …

Communications display these federal officials are usually fully aware that the stress they exert is an effective plus necessary way to induce social-media platforms to increase censorship. The top of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency even griped about the need to overcome social-media companies’ ‘ hesitation’ to work alongside the government …

This unlawful government disturbance violates the fundamental right of free speech for all Americans, if they are on social media. More discovery is needed to uncover the full degree of this regime — i actually. e., the identities associated with other White House plus agency officials involved and the nature and content of their communications with social-media companies. ”

Jenin Younes, lawsuit counsel for the New Municipal Liberties Alliance added: 5

“ In case there was ever any question the federal government was behind censorship of Americans who dared to dissent from standard COVID messaging, that question has been erased. The shocking extent of the government’s participation in silencing Americans, by means of coercing social-media companies, has been revealed … ”

Federal Agencies Involved in Totally free Speech Suppression

Documents obtained so far possess identified more than 50 government employees across 15 federal agencies, who participated in these censorship meetings or otherwise involved in illegal censorship activities. 6   Including officials from:

Emails from a strategic communications plus marketing firm called Reingold 7   also reveals that outdoors consultants were hired to control the government’s collusion along with social media to censor Americans. For example , Reingold set up the “ partner support portal” for the CDC so that CDC officials could link email messages to the portal for easier flagging of content it wanted censored by social media marketing companies linked to the portal.

Big Tech Businesses Involved in Government Censorship

On the private sector side, notable tech individuals in the censorship meetings consist of:

While some social media businesses may have “ hesitated” in order to censor on the government’s behalf at times, Facebook was certainly an eager beaver from the get-go. As early as February 2020, Fb CEO Mark Zuckerberg was in contact with the State Department, offering its services to help “ control information and false information related to coronavirus. ” 8

Biden Administration’s ‘ Executive Privilege’ Denied

As you might expect, the White House has not cooperated with discovery and have fought to keep communications secret — especially with regard to Dr . Anthony Fauci’s correspondence — claiming all White House communications as “ privileged. ”

However , executive privilege does NOT apply to external communications, so the plaintiffs known as on the U. S. Area Court for the Western District of Louisiana to “ overrule the government defendants’ objections and order them to supply this highly relevant, responsive and probative information immediately. ”

Sept 7, 2022, Judge Terry Doughty did just that. The particular Biden administration’s claim of executive privilege was turned down and Doughty ordered the particular White House to hand over any and all relevant records. 9   Which includes correspondence to and from Fauci, White-colored House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre and many others. According to the judge’s order, they have three days to comply.

Examples of Illegal Government Censorship

On Twitter, 10   Missouri AG Schmitt provides shared a long list of examples of federal government censorship, including one record in which Clarke Humphrey, COVID-19 response digital director at the White House, asked Fb to take down the Instagram accounts “ anthonyfauciofficial, ” the parody account dedicated to producing fun of Fauci. 11   Facebook complied.

Schmitt also shared emails 12, 13   between a senior Fb official and the surgeon common, stating, “ I know our own teams met today to higher understand the scope of what the White House expects from us on misinformation in the years ahead. ” This email came on the heels of the surgeon general’s July 2021 “ misinformation health advisory. ”

The CDC also coordinated with Facebook, providing them with talking factors to debunk various states, including the claim that spike proteins in the COVID shots is usually dangerous and cytotoxic. Within a July 28, 2021, email, a CDC official offered Facebook with the following counter-narrative, taken straight from the “ How mRNA Vaccines Work” section on the CDC website: 14

“ Messenger mRNA [sic] vaccines work simply by teaching our cells to generate a  harmless spike protein   … ”   (Emphasis in the original. )

Fast-forward in order to mid-June 2022, and the CDC was suddenly less sure about the harmlessness of the surge protein.

Up until then, the words “ harmless spike protein” had been bolded, but in this June revision, they removed the bolding, along with an entire area in which they’d previously stated that mRNA was rapidly broken down and spike protein did not last more than a few weeks in the body. 15   Clearly, the truth has been catching up to them plus certain lies were getting too risky to hold onto.

CISA also reached out to Google, Meta (Facebook’s parent company), Ms and Twitter for assist, shortly after the  DHS’s Disinformation Governance Board   was announced. 16   Thankfully, public outcry put an end to this particular Orwellian Ministry of Reality before it got started.

When Censorship Becomes Election Interference

According to The Washington Times: 17

“ Details about the Biden administration’s conduct raised the hackles of Republican lawmakers. ‘ Confirming that this is the most dangerously anti-free speech administration in United states history AND that Facebook … is nothing but an appendage of the deep state, ‘ Sen. Josh Hawley, Missouri Republican, said on Tweets as he shared news from the court filing. ”

Other lawmakers are also getting involved. In an August 29, 2022, notice 18, 19   to Attorney General Merrick Garland and F Director Christopher A. Wray, Republican Sens. Charles Electronic. Grassley of Iowa plus Ron Johnson of Wisconsin requested records of the government’s contacts with social media companies to ascertain whether the FBI and/or DOJ did, in fact , instruct them to censor information about the Hunter Biden laptop scandal by falsely referring to this as “ Russian disinformation. ” 20

Zuckerberg has also been asked 21   to provide any communication involving the censorship of the Seeker Biden laptop story, especially as it pertains to the FBI’s directions to censor this politics hot potato — some thing he openly admitted in the recent Joe Rogan interview (see video above). 22

Lawmakers Pursue Legislation in order to Penalize Gov’t Censorship

Three Republican Home Representatives on the House Oversight and Reform, Judiciary, together with Commerce committees — Reps. James Comer of Kentucky, Jim Jordan of Kentkucky, and Cathy McMorris Rodgers of Washington — have likewise introduced the Protecting Talk from Government Interference Turn 23   (HR. 8752), aimed at stopping federal employees from using their particular positions to influence censorship decisions by tech tools.

The bill would certainly create restrictions to prevent national employees from asking as well as encouraging private entities to censor private speech or else discourage free speech, in addition to impose penalties, including city fines and disciplinary things for government employees who all facilitate social media censorship.

While the U. Ersus. Constitution clearly forbids govt censoring and restricting no cost speech, HR. 8752 is actually a helpful enforcement tool, like people might tend to think again when they know there’s a tremendous and personal price to pay.

My latest publication, “ The Truth About COVID-19 , ” is an immediate best-seller. After thousands of ratings it has a nearly perfect 5-star rating, so grab your personal copy today before it’s got too late!


–   Solutions and References



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *