The particular world’s leading medical diary has conceded that the Covid pandemic could have been sparked with a laboratory leak and admits that the virus may have been engineered by scientists.
It might seem a statement of the obvious within calling on global bodies to intensify efforts to determine if Covid-19 came from a lab in the Chinese city of Wuhan or crossed over from animals infected with a softball bat virus.
Yet this is a remarkable turnaround for the 199-year-old Lancet, which printed an infamous article condemning suggestions of a lab leak as ‘ conspiracy theories’.
However , the particular journal – which states the world should take ‘ seriously’ both main ideas – has also suggested the virus could be linked to laboratories in america, provoking fears it is still promoting China’s cause instead of good science.
Certainly the landmark report of the Lancet commission into Covid-19 increases many issues, including the supposed stifling of scientific controversy, the role of experts and the disturbing fear the West may be kowtowing to China’s dictatorship.
This inquiry – which concludes that the World Wellness Organisation and many world market leaders reacted too slowly – was intended to be the authoritative probe into the pandemic. It points out there are two ‘ pathways of emergence’ for that strange coronavirus that made an appearance in late 2019: through a ‘ natural spillover event’ through nature, or from ‘ research-related activities’.
It is known some diseases, such as the 2003 Sars crisis, were traced to ‘ zoonotic’ transmission (from creatures to humans), although no proven animal host continues to be found for Sars-CoV-2, herpes that causes Covid -19.
We also know that China covered up early cases, silenced doctors, ignored outside inquiries, hid essential data and was executing high-risk experiments in optimum bio-security laboratories that specialist in research into bat coronaviruses in Wuhan.
Yet this query by The Lancet – right now attacked by the strangely intense zoonotic lobby that dismisses any suggestion of a lab leak – has been dogged by controversy.
Soon after the virus emerged, the journal published one of the most well known scientific statements in current history: a note by twenty-seven experts attacking ‘ conspiracy theory theories suggesting that Covid-19 does not have a natural origin’.
This influential letter played a critical role in silencing scientific, political plus media discussion of any kind of idea that the pandemic might have begun with a lab occurrence.