Influential elites are either in denial about the horrifying costs and consequences of Net Absolutely no – witness last Wednesday’s substantial vote against hydraulic fracing British gas in the House of Commons – or busy scooping up the almost limitless amounts of money currently on offer for promoting pseudoscience environment scares and investing in impracticable green technologies.
Until the lamps start to go out and heating system fails, they are unlikely to pay much attention to a recent 1, 000 page alternative energy investigation undertaken for a Finnish Government agency by Associate Professor Simon Michaux. Talking about the U. K. is actually 2050 Net Zero focus on, Michaux states there is “ simply not enough time, nor resources to do this by the current target”.
To report just one example of how un-costed Net Zero is, Michaux notes that “ in theory” there are enough global reserves of nickel and lithium if they are exclusively utilized to produce batteries for electric powered vehicles. But there is not enough cobalt, and more will need to be uncovered.
This gets much worse. All of the new batteries have a helpful working life of just 8-10 years, so replacements will need to be regularly produced. “ This is unlikely to be useful, which suggests the whole EV battery pack solution may need to be re-thought and a new solution is created that is not so mineral intense, ” he says.
All of these problems occur in locating a mass of lithium for ion batteries weighting 286. 6 million tonnes. But the “ power buffer” of another 2 . 5 billion dollars tonnes of batteries is also required to provide a four-week backing up for intermittent wind plus solar electricity power.
Of course , this really is simply not available from worldwide mineral reserves, but , states Michaux, it is not clear the way the buffer could be delivered with the alternative system.