The fight for political supremacy on the western part of the country has been decided.
The so-called progressives have won; very conservative and libertarians have lost. The particular “ march through the establishments, ” started by the misdirected 1968 generation, has been productive, and their children and grandchildren are now at the helm. Eco-socialist, cultural Marxist, in short: bolshewoke ideas prevail in politics and tradition, public administration, media, universities, universities, and increasingly even in business. At accelerating rate. If you have kept the same center-left viewpoint over the remaining twenty years, you are considered far correct today.
Within virtually all Democratic states, there is a tendency for larger companies to drift to the left as time passes. This applies equally to television stations, newspapers, politics parties, state authorities, educational institutions, and other associations.
Why is this so? The reason is twofold:
First, if you like to create details or projects on your own, or even prefer to work for making a living and enjoying private life with your family, you are probably less likely to join any of these institutions. However, if you like to manipulate other people and control them, you are completely inclined to join these organizations.
The first position correlates rather with conventional positions, the second rather along with progressive positions. And specifically because the most fundamental feature of Progressive ideas is they do not work, Progressives focus in institutions where ideas do not have to work in order to outlive. That is why Progressives are disproportionately found in professions where financially measurable results do not have to be achieved.
Thus, Progressives are often media people, instructors, professors, politicians, or otherwise employed in government service or tax-funded nongovernmental governmental organizations. It has the additional effect that they can after that use this position to agrivate and discredit permanently, while their victims are active proving themselves on the market, gaining their own living and also supporting their Progressive opponents through taxes.
2nd, conservatives and libertarians tend to be tolerant toward differing political positions. If someone is actually a leftie in their organization, mainly they would allow this individual to stay. Not so with the Progressives: They want to missionize and drive all nonprogressive fellow residents, whom they consider possibly unenlightened or bribed, to some happiness defined by them. Progressives only give a placement in an organization to those who have the same world view and kick out dissenters go ahead and.
And this is how it has been going on for decades in newsrooms, broadcasting stations, universities, and authorities. Whomever is not of their opinion can be defamed, suppressed, slandered. Consequently, most of these institutions have been irreparably destroyed and can no longer be converted with reasonable effort.
If one can mobilize $50 billion like Elon Musk, then one can take more than Twitter. But it will still be difficult to turn the platform into a beacon of freedom of speech since planned. That’s because virtually the entire workforce tends politically to the left (relation of donations of Twitter employees in the Biden-Trump presidential campaign: 98: 2). Since the majority of this type of person convinced they are in the right and fighting for a good cause, Musk’s attempts to permit dissent will be sabotaged. Musk will have to replace large parts of the workforce to change this in the long term.
Equivalent things apply to newspapers, TELEVISION stations, administrations, including the management of the armed forces and police, the courts, and virtually all educational institutions. Reforms or in other words of a freedom-oriented policy are certainly not impossible but extremely difficult, and they will probably be watered down, due to the fact existing sensitivities have to be taken into consideration.
Not Forcing People to Be Happy
We have also to keep in mind that every new generation of students is released to the voting age even more firmly ideologized, thus producing more and more streamlined voters, who are no more reachable by argumentation and who are not even willing to expose themselves to competing fights. They learn that the state solves all their problems. Only a minority is able to break out of this framework by own attempts of thought.
Why force these people to become happy against their may? This only makes you unpopular and them angry. Rather, those who refuse for life to become adults, and thus self-responsible individuals, should bear the consequences by themselves, And the consequences will be serious. One only has to reveal that almost almost everything that the woke mainstream claims and that is more or less absorbed by the people, can be wrong and the politics depending on it will therefore inevitably fail.
For example , take the concept that an industrialized country could be supplied with wind power plus solar energy only, or the conviction that the world’s population can be fed with organic foods without any fertilizers and insect sprays, the idea that one can impose all kinds of planned economic requirements over the economy without any major lack of prosperity, or the idea that one can increase the money supply whenever without triggering massive inflation sooner or later.
Or take the complete refusal in order to subject drastic measures to some harm-benefit analysis, for example steps against covid, against climate change, or against The ussr. Take the idea that man and woman are social constructs and that there are more than two genders, or the conviction that people are exactly the same and can perform all tasks equally nicely with the appropriate education, or the idea of preventing or sanctioning free speech for an claimed good cause, and so on. Mistakes accumulated over decades, today add up to a veritable delusion and inevitably to a downfall.
Learning through Pain
The message is that the small number of promoters of freedom should not waste their energy trying to alter systems from within that can not be repaired. The drastic cure, rather, is to allow complete and irrevocable failure of such systems, learning through pain. Only this will drive the particular eco-socialist insanity out of householder’s minds to some extent. This cup must now be finished towards the end.
This is simply not an easy medicine, as many individuals will suffer as a result, including people who saw the disaster coming and warned in time. Yet this is the only way to achieve a sustainable change in considering and thus a turning away from statist collectivism and towards personal responsibility, which by all means also includes caring for other people. The opposite of political collectivism is not selfish individualism, it really is self-determination. And this is a idea beyond left or correct.
The main understanding is this: there is no right to reside at the expense of others. Of course , we can and should feel morally obliged to help people who can not help themselves, especially among family and friends. And we can take more than respective contractual obligations, similar to a marriage. But there is no human right to sue unrelated others for providing you a full time income.
This insight is crucial for a peaceful long term beyond an all-powerful condition, so let us work it out a bit.
Over time, instead of limiting individual rights to liberty, the well intentioned have added more and more so-called participation legal rights. These include rights such as the directly to work, the right to free education, the right to a gentle existence with housing, clothing, medical care, “ satisfactory remuneration” and so on. Sounds good, yet what is completely lacking is the understanding that these rights can only be asserted at the expenditure of third parties and only by an all-powerful state. They are in direct conflict with the human rights to liberty.
Merely cannot afford a “ humane” apartment, then someone else has to pay for it. Who enforces this against whom and who decides what constitutes a humane existence? As elements stand, this can only function as the state, which thereby intervenes in the property rights and freedom of action of its citizens.
Basically, the fundamental liberty rights initially conceived as a right associated with defense against the state, are usually transformed now into power of intervention which the condition has against its residents and which cannot or even must not defend themselves towards them. It is therefore not surprising which the existence of particpation legal rights has become a constant cause of challenges for distribution. Endless political struggles.
The recent idea of an universal basic income is only the reasonable consequence of believing you have the right to live at the expense of others without having to pay anything in return. This doesn’t add up, obviously. Ultimately, it can only be at the expense of those whom generate surpluses that can after that be taken away from them. This particular discourages them. Finally, the state will have to force them to operate order to earn the essential income for the others. In another context, this configuration is called slavery.
Rights at the expense of third parties are in reality privileges. They are an incohérence that causes considerable discord. Correctly understood, there is only one essential human right— namely, the best to be left alone, in order to be able to lead one’s self-determined life. All other human rights are either legitimate derivatives thereof or illegitimate liberties at the expense of 3rd parties.
Only if these insight has been internalized can a new era dawn.
Otherwise, following the downfall, there will be only a lukewarm reform by “ moderate” professional politicians, which will result in the fact that a few years later, the very forces that caused the mess will be in charge once again.
Room intended for Maneuver for Freedom Searchers
The good news is that will freedom-oriented persons, be these people libertarian, classical liberal, conventional, or whatever, do not have to wait idly for this collapse, which could also mean a long drop instead of a big bang. Rather, parallel structures can be setup immediately. The big advantage is that you simply don’t need a majority to do it and that you can make an immediate difference by yourself. After all, successful parallel structures have a role design effect that will come to complete fruition when the existing systems fail more and more.
Admittedly, there is a catch. You actually have to do something about it— namely, get out of your rut. It won’t be enough just to create know-it-all articles or responses in the online media or participate in petitions and demonstrations. You have to create something new based on your own actions. That is stressful.
But in come back a meaningful existence beckons, creating the seed for any better and above all freer world. Even if it is not completely successful in our lifetime, the particular seed is sown to get future generations. And really everyone can participate and many people are needed.
In contrast to the other side, such undertakings occur at one’s own expense and in recognition of reality, instead of delusional narratives. They may be accompanied by a willingness to face competition of ideas and techniques. Only through this stress of competition can completely stable and antifragile buildings be established.
Whoever relentlessly evaluates himself or herself and their own situation, gains sovereignty on the present, which, as hard as it may be, nevertheless confronts one with selectable options for action. Conversely, those who usually do not want to make this cognitive energy, deserve only the status quo.
The progressive regime angles its power primarily on absolute domination of the media, the cultural sector, central banks, and educational institutions. These types of areas in particular are for that reason candidates for the creation associated with parallel structures, along with alternate systems of living with each other.
What they have got in common is not to focus on reforming existing systems, but to produce them obsolete through better models. What is at stake is nothing less than the creation of parallel societies plus parallel elites.
The media domination has of course not gone unnoticed simply by critical minds and so, because of the internet, countless new media have got emerged, with widely varying quality. This includes alternatives in order to social media.
You can find journalists who have managed to attract an audience of hundreds of thousands just on the strength of the quality and impartiality of their work, such as Joe Rogan in the USA or Boris Reitschuster in Germany. They are flanked by numerous bloggers whom tirelessly bring new factors of view and details to light.
The former gatekeepers are now impressive back with attempts associated with technical and legal censorship, but the genie will not return into the bottle. That’s good.
New libertarian heroic figures in books such as Charles Knight or Carl Brun have what it takes to reach broad audiences. In the case of a movie adaptation, you could even develop new cult series. In the film and music field, so many artists have been canceled recently that it is becoming simpler by the day to find one who actively participates in the construction of an alternative counterculture instead of reverentially crawling back into the woke herd.
Education and learning
In order to defend our children from brainwashing, we urgently need parallel structures in education. Keep in mind that in lots of countries, homeschooling is forbidden.
Luckily, home schooling always has promoted alternative offerings and numerous educational possibilities are emerging, including brand-new, “ nonwoke” universities like the University of Austin in Texas.
With this sector, too, many techniques are likely to fail, especially the ones that dispense with knowledge exchange and performance measurements. This kind of selection process is something quite normal in brand new markets. Only through learning from mistakes, and imitation and copying of successful models, may a better system be produced. This is how evolution works. There is nothing wrong with that.
As everywhere, competition encourages business. Here is my offer: For an alternative school education, historic human development ought to be taken as a yardstick— in addition to the classical curriculum— and children be taught not only the knowledge but also the appropriate skills, a minimum of in the basics. Staggered according to age group, with increasing level of difficulty, starting with making open fire, building a wall, sewing clothes up to metallurgical and computer-based processes.
Teenagers with the appropriate education would not only be capable of survival plus self-confidence on the basis of the work of their own hands, but were furthermore able to understand from their personal experience why the world is where it is today, especially in technical and economic terms.
The litmus check for true education should be: Suppose you were transported by time machine back to the Stone Age or the Ancient, could you teach people right now there anything meaningful?
In finance, parallel structures are the most advanced. The monopoly associated with state money and central banks has already been broken simply by bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. The significance of this cannot be overstated. Generally, this fulfills Hayek’s call to take the monopoly of money away from governments so that we don’t keep running into currency disasters every couple of years.
Anyone who will pay directly from person to person without having to ask permission from intermediaries such as banks is naturally a hazard to the regime. This is especially true in times when unwelcome critics regularly have their bank accounts terminated.
Therefore , we can still expect a fierce battle here, with efforts to ban bitcoin under the guise of saving energy. It is precisely the energy crisis which you can use by the very establishment accountable for it, to ban unwelcome parallel currencies like bitcoin. Sadly, probably to the applause of the masses.
But this genie is out of the bottle too and can not be pushed back totally. Even if bitcoin will be prohibited in many countries, it will not be prohibited everywhere and there are enough successors and variants, which includes gold-backed payment systems.
Politics and Interpersonal Systems
One of the most difficult issue is the development of new systems of living together— that is, new politics or social orders. Present political systems are characterized by false incentives for both the rulers and the governed. The rulers are not liable and have no economic disadvantages if they create bad decisions. The governed are led to believe that they could vote “ free” advantages into their pockets. This politicizes the state’s monopoly over the use of force and results in constant changes in the “ interpersonal contract. ” The result is really a constant struggle to influence these changes in a particular direction.
Penetration of the market is particularly difficult since it usually requires secession, revolution, or at least the winning of the absolute majority in elections. Again, however , there are seite an seite structures that are easier to accomplish.
Free Private Cities
I have already proposed a peaceful and voluntary alternative: free private cities . A free private town is characterized by the fact that it really is organized by a for-profit firm, the city operator, who provides a “ government service provider. ” This operator may also be partly or wholly owned simply by citizens.
On this capacity, the operator guarantees its citizens the protection of life, liberty, plus property. The services provided by the particular operator include internal and external security, a predefined legal plus regulatory framework, and an independent dispute resolution system. Participation is 100 percent voluntary.
Interested individuals plus companies enter into a “ citizen contract” with it and pay a fixed annual charge for these services in lieu of fees. Within this framework, a “ spontaneous order” can develop, caused by the voluntary activities plus decisions of citizens.
The operator are not able to later unilaterally change the resident contract without the consent of the citizen concerned. Disputes among citizens and the operator are heard by external arbitration tribunals, as is common within international commercial law. If the operator ignores the settlement awards or abuses the power, its customers depart and it faces insolvency.
Since all property is currently controlled by governments, the establishment of a free of charge private city requires the operator to enter into a contractual agreement with an current state. In this agreement, the particular “ host nation” scholarships the operator the right to determine the free private town on a certain territory under certain conditions, which include legal autonomy in various areas.
States may be willing to relinquish some of their power in return for promised benefits. Included in this are, for example , job creation, foreign investment, and a share from the profits generated by the operator. The existence of a large number of special financial zones around the world demonstrates the basic willingness of countries to visit down this path.
Free Private Towns do have a chance. That’s since people don’t want to be subjugated by rules and regulations that they have not really consented to. People avoid want to pay for things they have not ordered. And sensible people don’t need hundreds or thousands of laws to reside peacefully together. People need a safe space where they can congregate and cooperate peacefully, but are otherwise left alone by coercive professionals. Free Private Cities can deliver these human wishes. The existing political systems are not able to. It is for this reason that Free Private Cities have a chance to succeed. Since eventually, individuals will go where they are treated best.
Of course, it is not an easy path, as well as countries open to it, it needs years of negotiations and legislative changes. Nevertheless, it must be taken; me and others are working on it or comparable models, as well as the first emerging economies, for example Honduras, have embarked on it. Further projects in Africa and Central America are usually in the pipeline. However , within Honduras, the empire is usually striking back already after a socialist election victory. The irony is that the very political figures who want to get rid of the most innovative forms of governance in the world, the Honduran zones for economic development and employment (ZEDEs), contact themselves “ Progressives. ”
Be it as it is, the momentum is there, plus there is now a Free City movement around the world that desires to try out alternative forms of federal government. Be it free private metropolitan areas, prosperity zones, charter cities, bitcoin cities, and the like.
However , in most places, governments are not willing to grant even a limited autonomy. What to do? Inside my view, the best thing is what Prussian military strategist Carl vonseiten Clausewitz advised: “ 1st create a secure base. ”
Small and smallest units by the citizens themselves can be created within the existing system, by taking benefit of the remaining niches of independence in contract law plus cooperative law. It is also simpler to rally a critical mass of like-minded people than to win nationwide elections. Cooperation in between many small units on a contractual basis can also be more efficient organizationally and financially, politically conflict-free, and culturally autonomous, especially in the digital age. This approach can be institutionalized— namely, by founding an intentional community, on the contractual basis or like a cooperative on a defined lot.
There are currently purely idealistic value towns and settlements that often have collectivist and egalitarian ideals (community ownership, veganism, equal pay for all, etc . ). They are usually attached to a single strong leader. Their main problem is that they usually fall apart relatively quickly due to the undeniable diversity of individuals and their interests.
Therefore , successful intentional communities should intervene as little as possible in the way their members shape their lives, yet should rather have “ reside and let live” as their motto. They should merely presuppose certain common values that protect voluntariness, freedom, but additionally cohesion in the community.
In this respect, guiding ideas of the intentional community can be: independence of contract, private real estate, self-determination, and market economy, as well as willingness to help, fascination with the welfare of other human beings, as well as in certain locations, the desire to preserve and give one’s own language plus culture.
Naturally , in such cases all state laws and regulations are still applicable; but at least in the area of security, dispute quality, and social harmony, a more pleasant coexistence can be set up through this design. In addition, the intentional community can try to gradually establish its parallel systems in the regions of energy supply, education, plus social security, in order to avoid the existing systems as much as possible within the limits of legal possibilities. The particular creation of its own (crypto)currency or the use of an existing one is also conceivable. By permitting the intentional community in order to reject applicants and terminate those who break the rules, positive selection is possible.
We ought to try to start parallel structures immediately in order not to remain isolated in the coming turbulent times. It’s a good thing. New communities of values could be created. People get to know one another and help each other. The way along the way gives confidence, is frequently even fun, and by performing instead of talking, the wheat is separated from the chaff.
It always goes on somehow. It’s as much as us how.
Let’s spit on our hands and get to work.