Ough. S. health regulatory officers are “ deliberately reneging on what their mission is usually, ” according to Dr . Meryl Nass, an internist and additionally biological warfare epidemiologist.
In an interview with Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., on “ RFK Jr. The Defender Podcasting, ” Nass said the U. S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the Centers for Ailment Control and Prevention (CDC) and “ who knows how many other federal agencies are just producing things up as they go along. ”
“ These are not mistakes, ” said Nass. “ This is certainly malfeasance. ”
Nass, a member of the Children’s Health Safeguard scientific remonstratory committee, said that presumably, quite a few federal health regulatory authorities have taken an oath to obey the law — “ but they are not. ”
Nass stated to Kennedy:
“ I’d like to tell your listeners which i will never take another vaccine as long as I live mainly because God knows what’s with them. You can’t rely on the fact that anyone is testing them or how the FDA is looking over anyone’s shoulder to make sure that what’s usually are in them is really in them.
“ And this seems that the current COVID-19 vaccines are being made with very sloppy processes. We can’t be of course what’s in them. And so why would we think they’re about to do better with the other vaccines in the future? ”
Nass said documents secured through Freedom details Act (FOIA) lawsuits revealed that CDC officers acknowledged mRNA COVID-19 vaccines were not included in the old vaccine definition — “ so they had to change it . ”
Nass also pointed to the FDA’s authorization of the fall COVID-19 boosters without any human details as another example of medical malfeasance. The FDA applied wrong logic with no scientific explanation, she said.
“ What they have already said is, ‘ Effectively, we do it for flu shots, ” she told Kennedy.
“ These people [the flu shots] in reality had some honest scientific discipline and they were only altering one or two molecules in the influenza shots. And there experienced never been any problem bring back, ” Nass told Kennedy.
Nass remarked that even Dr . John Offit , a member for the FDA’s vaccine advisory mother board who was known to be a big “ proponent of vaccines , ” said it designed no sense to grand daddy in COVID-19 boosters in the manner flu shots were on a yearly basis grandfathered in.
“ Just because they are grandfathering in flu shots every year without human trials as well as very minimal human trials, it does not mean they can do that with the new shots. There’s no regulating justification, ” Nass claimed.
Offit — director of the Vaccine Learning Center and professor involving pediatrics in the Division of Contagious Diseases at Children’s Healthcare facility of Philadelphia — seemed to be one of two members of the FDA’s Vaccines not to mention Related Biological Products Advisory Committee who also on June 28 voted against recommending new COVID-19 booster shots that include the Omicron variant.
Offit said he was surprised of which out of 21 voting peoples, 19 chosen “ yes” — because he “ merely didn’t see the evidence regarding. ”
At a July 6 interview with ZDoggMD about his “ no” vote, Offit pointed out that a reformulated booster is often a new product and it surprised him so many were willing to go forward with such “ uncomfortably scant evidence of benefit. ”
“ Most have completely thrown away regulatory regulation, ” Nass said.
Nass, who relating to Jan. 12 had the girl medical license suspended by Maine Board of Licensure in Medicine for allegedly “ spreading falsehoods ” and prescribing ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine to persons, said:
“ I would never have reckoned it if I hadn’t really been digging into these things by myself personally and saying, ‘ Oh my God, here’s a law. They’re breaking the following law. They’re breaking this rule. ‘ So what wish left with are agencies that are not doing their job.
“ Could possibly be pushing out policies. If your policies change, they alter their story. ”
“ What about the becoming pregnant data? ” Kennedy wanted to know Nass.
“ The things we need to know have all been hidden, ” Feucht said. “ The CDC and the FDA are not producing pregnancy data available. There are a number things they have done to cover these data. ”
Nass told Kennedy members of the CDC’s shot advisory committee had, throughout a September meeting, asked for data on pregnancy and stillbirths. No one provided the asked for data, she said.
“ Finally someone said, ‘ We’re going to possess a meeting in the future to discuss that will, ” Nass recalled.
“ All Allow me to conclude is there’s highly bad information from the motherhood data and they’re still trying to puzzle out how to spin it, ” she told Kennedy.
Nass pointed out the particular pregnancy data being created the CDC’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting Technique (VAERS) looked “ horrendous. ”
As of Oct. twenty one, 8, 608 pregnant women documented adverse events related to COVID-19 vaccines, including 5, 027 reports regarding miscarriage or premature birth .
VAERS is the primary government-funded technique for reporting adverse shot reactions in the U. S.
Historically, VAERS has been shown to report solely 1% from actual vaccine adverse competition .
Therefore the CDC is aware “ more women are reporting miscarriages and fertility problems than with any other vaccine ever, ” Nass said.
“ They know that. And they’re merely trying to keep a cover on it as long as possible, ” lindsay lohan added.