December 10, 2022

Was your Pandemic Orchestrated as a Test Run for Responding to the Biological Attack?

The evidence that the coronavirus originated in a lab is now  convincing, as is the evidence that the virus  was  spreading  undetected  all of the over  the world  by autumn 2019, with 1 blood sample from Lombardy  found  to be positive for both viral RNA  and antibodies as early as September 12th 2019. One crucial outstanding query is who knew what and when. In particular, what do the […]#@@#@!!

Evidence that the coronavirus originated in a lab is now  compelling , as is evidence that the virus  had been   growing   undetected   throughout   the world   by autumn 2019, with one blood sample from Lombardy  found   to be optimistic for both viral RNA  and antibodies as early as Sept 12th 2019.

One crucial excellent question is who knew what and when. In particular, what did the U. H. know about the virus before The month of january 2020 and what did the Chinese Government know, and what part did each therefore play in driving ahead the pandemic emergency?

Here I will believe both the U. S. as well as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) knew or suspected that an engineered virus was moving from mid-November 2019, and that while the CCP was initially not really worried about the virus, the U. S. biodefence network was much more concerned. The outbreak emergency was therefore mainly created by the U. H. biodefence network, which tried it as an opportunity to put into practice all of the emergency protocols it had been getting yourself ready for two decades to respond to a natural attack or pandemic. While the virus quickly turned out to be gentle, the emergency response continued largely because the train got already started running as well as the opportunity was too great to miss.

If the U. S. and it is allies did know something covertly before 2020, the most likely people who would are aware of it are members of the cleverness and security networks. Exactly what, then, can we surmise about what they knew from what they were saying plus doing in autumn and winter 2019-20 and from later reports?

Consider Dr . Michael Callahan, an ex-CIA agent who also now runs the Oughout. S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) and was the U. S. Government’s only  confirmed point of get in touch with   in Wuhan in January 2020. Out of the blue, Dr . Callahan  contacted mRNA vaccine expert Doctor Robert Malone   on January 4th 2020 to tell him that (to quote Dr . Malone): “ There was a novel coronavirus circulating in the Wuhan area, it was looking like a significant biothreat, and I should get ‘ my team’ engaged in searching for ways to mitigate the risk of this particular new agent. ”

Be aware that at this point nobody else has been spreading alarm about the new virus, which according to the public record had only been sequenced and confirmed to be a story SARS-like virus by the private Chinese company  Eyesight Medicals   upon December 27th. Certainly the particular CCP was not spreading alarm. Prior to the Wuhan lockdown on January 23rd 2020, the CCP was  actively playing down the threat   from the virus, suppressing news of it and not making any kind of concerted response. The videos supposedly showing people collapsing in the streets with the malware that went round social media at the time were promoted not by the CCP but simply by organisations  opposed to the CCP , aiming to uncover its cover-up of the pathogen. Most people in the West, too, are not treating the virus as a substantial threat and it was barely registering on government daily activities. Recall that in early January there were officially just a few individuals in hospital in Wuhan and no recorded deaths, so any notion that this pathogen was a major threat to global public health had been purely hypothetical – or even based on information not within the public domain.

However , Dr . Callahan was not alone in his early alarmism. Other people from the U. S. biodefence network were conspicuously alarmist and actively trying to raise a sense of alarm in these around them right from the start associated with January.

In the White House,   Mouthpiece National Security Advisor  Matt Pottinger   was stoking up the terror. As Michael Senger  notes : “ Throughout January 2020, Pottinger unilaterally called White House meetings unbeknownst to those in attendance and breached protocol to ratchet up alarm about the new coronavirus based on details from his own sources in China, despite having simply no official intelligence to online backup his alarmism. ”

It was Pottinger which brought in fellow alarmist  Deborah Birx   as White House Coronavirus Response Coordinator at the end of Feb 2020, who was herself a key component in pushing the alarmist agenda and bringing lockdowns to America.

The leaked  ‘ Red Dawn’ emails   among U. H. Government officials and others in early 2020 show long-time lockdown proponent Dr . Carter Mecher of the Department of Experienced Affairs also pushing for strong responses from quite early on. On January 28th, Mecher wrote: “ In whatever way you cut it, this is going to be bad. You guys made fun associated with me screaming to close the schools. Now I’m screaming, close the colleges and universities. ”

Dr . Mecher is an associate of Dr . Richard Hatchett, formerly from the National Institutes for Health (NIH) and now CEO of the Gates-funded pandemic vaccine organisation  CEPI , along with whom he  wrote a paper   in 2007 purporting to utilize the lessons of the 1918 pandemic to promote social removing. A sister  document , also funded by the NIH, was  created at the same time   by Imperial College’s Professor Neil Ferguson. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Director (then and now) Dr . Anthony Fauci  commented   in 2007 that  the two research underline that “ a primary lesson of the 1918 influenza pandemic is that it is critical in order to intervene early… Nonpharmaceutical interventions may buy valuable time at the beginning of a pandemic while a targeted vaccine is being produced”.

Richard Hatchett happened to be attending the World Economic Forum when China secured down Wuhan on The month of january 23rd 2020. The following time he gave a  press conference   with Jeremy Farrar, Movie director of the Wellcome Trust and a board member of CEPI, plus Moderna’s CEO Stephane Bancel, backing China’s draconian response and making clear it was straight out of his own playbook.

One thing that is important to understand, is the fact that when you don’t have treatments and also you don’t have vaccines, non-pharmaceutical interventions are literally the only thing that you have, and it’s a combination of isolation, hold, infection prevention and control and then these social isolating interventions.  

There is historical precedent for his or her use. We looked intensively and did an historic analysis of the use of non-pharmaceutical interventions in U. T. cities in 1918 and exactly what we found was that metropolitan areas that introduced multiple surgery, early in an epidemic, got much better outcomes.

The ‘ we’ of course here refers to Neil Ferguson and Carter Mecher, as per the above.

Further possible evidence of the particular involvement of the U. T. intelligence community and biodefence network is that the messages of the ‘ whistleblower’ doctor Li Wenliang in Wuhan were initially  promoted within English by an organisation  funded from the U. S. Government . The flooding of social networking with messages promoting lockdown in 2020 was also seen in 2014 with  Ebola in Sierra Leone , where it was clearly the job of outside agents. Additionally it is of significance that the same  New York Times   reporter, Donald McNeil, wrote almost identical content praising the extreme interventions in both  2014   and  2020 .  

Anywhere you try looking in early 2020, amidst the ocean of general calm, any kind of source of alarm will almost always be found connected with someone linked to the biodefence network of the U. S. and its allies – people such as Michael Callahan, Matt Pottinger, Deborah Birx, Richard Hatchett, Carter Mecher and Neil Ferguson.

It comes as not surprising then to learn that in the U. S. the virus was treated, not as a matter of general public health but of nationwide security. This approach, already apparent in the high level of action from the biodefence network, has been made official in March 2020 when the responsibility meant for policy in the pandemic was handed, as Debbie Lerman provides pointed out, not to the public health bodies but to the  National Security Council and its agencies . The policy document that the following policy decisions were based on has never been published.

Why would a virus that has as yet done hardly any be a national security matter? The most likely explanation is because it was known or thought to be a non-natural, engineered agent. This likely conclusion will be supported by other evidence, in particular by what intelligence reports suggest both the U. S i9000. and CCP knew in regards to the virus in November 2019.

A recent report from the U. S. Senate  showed   that the CCP made a significant safety intervention at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) on November 12th 2019 to address the “ complicated and grave situation dealing with [bio]security work”. The Senate report also implied that around the same time the WIV should have begun work on a shot for the new coronavirus – deduced from the fact that Yusen Zhou (who mysteriously passed away shortly afterwards) applied for a vaccine patent on February 24th 2020. These details indicate that the CCP grew to become aware that a leaked malware was circulating in mid-November, presumably because it noticed people falling ill and, through testing, traced it back to the WIV (while there is no direct evidence of this, U. T. intelligence reports have mentioned WIV workers falling ill with a Covid-like illness within November).  

The CCP’s response to discovering this appears to have been to address basic safety issues at the WIV and to begin working on a vaccine, but otherwise to suppress information about the virus and not treat it as a major threat. The particular CCP does not appear to have got alerted its health providers during November or Dec as medics in Wuhan had to discover it for themselves. This play-it-down plus suppress policy continued actually once doctors in Wuhan spotted the novel disease in their patients and obtained the near-complete sequence from the private lab on Dec 27th. The CCP after that continued to insist to get weeks that the virus was not spreading between humans, aggressively  suppressed   any suggestion it originated from a lab and pushed the scarcely plausible theory that it had jumped from animals in the wet marketplace. The sharing of the complete virus sequence on The month of january 11th only happened just because a Chinese scientist breached process to do so, and was disciplined for it. Even once the CCP abandoned its play-it-down plan and initiated aggressive non-pharmaceutical interventions on January 23rd it continued to  frustrate efforts to investigate the WIV and its virus information . It’s clear then, that up to January 23rd the CCP showed no sign of being worried about herpes, but every sign associated with worrying that the virus’s roots would be discovered.

Separately, the U. H. intelligence community has  let it be known   that it was aware of a brand new virus circulating in Cina from mid-November. As an Israeli news website  reported : “ In the second week of November, U. S. intelligence recognised that a disease with new characteristics was developing in Wuhan, China. They followed its spread, when at that will stage this classified info was not known to the press and did not come out of the Chinese regime either. ”

This cleverness is  said   to have come “ in the form of communications intercepts and overhead images showing improved activity at health facilities”. The U. S. army “ then alerted NATO and the [Israeli] IDF of the outbreak specifically at the end of November”.

So we know the U. Ersus. had intelligence on the malware circulating in mid-November. I think we have to assume this intel was linked to the CCP security intervention at the WIV via intercepted communications, and thus that will like the CCP, U. T. intelligence knew or suspected it was lab-engineered from that point. In case so , no one appears to have told Dr . Fauci great associates –   Fauci’s FOI emails   reveal him and his colleagues (Jeremy Farrar, Kristian Anderson etc . ) to be figuring out that it was likely engineered (and that they funded it) at the end of January. On Feb 1st, Fauci initiated a good urgent cover-up operation, made to discredit the idea of a laboratory leak as a baseless conspiracy theory theory, telling his co-workers: “ You will have tasks these days that must be done. ” It is far from clear whether Fauci orchestrated this cover-up on his own initiative or, more likely, after becoming instructed or pre-primed to do this by others in the biodefence network. The motive in any case was the same: to point the finger away from the particular U. S. ‘s financing of the implicated virus research and to avoid discrediting the field.

It therefore appears that from November 2019, both the CCP as well as the intelligence community of the Oughout. S. and its allies were watching the leaked break out to see what would happen and whether, as they hoped, it might fizzle out. Chinese President Xi Jinping and the CCP were keen to disregard it and suppress any alarm, as well as any touch of a lab leak. The biodefence network, on the other hand, appears to have been much more nervous about the brand new virus. As soon as word began to get out it amplified the news, spread alarm, pressed designed for strong interventions and activated biosecurity protocols, putting its members in charge wherever possible.  

Despite this alarmist mode, however , members from the biodefence network consistently backed the natural origins plus wet market theory plus suppressed the lab leak theory. This is very telling, as there is no way they could have got known at that early point it was not of lab origin, and as we know there was plenty of evidence in order to suggest it was, not least what we presume they understood about the Chinese intervention on the WIV. If we assume for any moment they did not believe it was lab-engineered it is very hard to account for their high degree of alarm about the new computer virus or activation of biodefence protocols and treating this as a national security issue at a time when officially it had not yet killed anybody and there were few hospital patients.

Moreover, publicly endorsing the lab leak theory or at least keeping it in play would clearly have been helpful to them as it would have added to the reason for alarm, reinforced their narrative of exposing the CCP’s virus cover-up plus unambiguously made it a national security matter. The choice instead to back the CCP’s implausible version of occasions and suppress the laboratory leak theory thus betrays that a lab leak must have been seriously inconvenient to them in another way, namely that it implicated them and risked discrediting their research.

It is also telling regarding this that when some in the Oughout. S. Government did start pushing the lab drip theory, the Chinese  responded   not by denying it yet by trying to  blame the U. Ersus.   for the leak. This feels like a caution shot: don’t expose all of us on this or we’ll uncover you.

As is well known, the CCP’s play-it-down strategy came to an immediate end on January 23rd 2020, when the CCP caved in to the alarmist calls for lockdowns and NPIs (which actually have a  long background in China ). Thereafter the country embraced its new policy with zeal, turning itself into a display for the extreme pandemic response measures, joining in the advertising of them around the world and really which makes them their own.

Therefore we find that the pandemic emergency was largely a creation of the U. S. biodefence network, with China coming on board after January 23rd. U. S. intelligence authorities had been following the virus (which they, like the CCP, knew or suspected was lab-engineered) from mid-November, and the biodefence network made sure news from the virus got out once doctors noticed it, growing alarm before there was something really to be alarmed about and treating it instantly as a biosecurity threat. I believe they did this at first, in part, out of genuine worry about the engineered virus, but also partly because they were itching to try out all the biosecurity methods they’d been preparing for years – not least the warp speed rollout of an mRNA vaccine. This second option motive also helps explain exactly why it all carried on once it was obvious the virus was not a significant threat to human living and the extreme responses are not justified. It was, in other words, a type of trial run for a biological attack orchestrated by the biodefence network of the U. S. and its allies, with the CCP playing a belated helping role.

In the event that true, this certainly helps you to make sense of it all. However it is hardly a comforting thought, because it reinforces that they are not done with us however, but are just getting ready to do it again, and who can stop them?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *