November 26, 2022

Cancel Culture’s War on History, Heritage & the Independence to Think for Yourself

We are being infantilized ad nauseum, dictated to incessantly, and forcefully protected from “dangerous” sights and sounds plus ideas that we are apparently too fragile, too susceptible, too susceptible, or as well ignorant to be exposed to without protection from the so-called elite.

“ All the time— this kind of is the tragi-comedy of our situation— we continue to clamour for all those very qualities we are object rendering impossible… In a sort of ghastly simplicity we remove the body organ and demand the function.   We make men without chests plus expect of them virtue plus enterprise.   We all laugh at honour and are also shocked to find traitors in our midst. We castrate and bid the geldings be fruitful. ” — C. S. Lewis,   The Abolition of Man

There will come a moment in the not-so-distant future once the very act of thinking for ourselves is not just outlawed but unthinkable.

We are being shunted down the road to that dystopian upcoming right now, propelled along simply by politically correct forces that will, while they  may   have began with the best of intentions, have fallen prey to the authoritarian siren song of the Childcare professional State, which has promised to save the populace from evils that only a select couple of are wise enough to recognize as such.

As a result, we are being infantilized ad nauseum, dictated to continuously, and forcefully insulated from “ dangerous” sights and sounds and ideas that we are apparently too fragile, too susceptible, too susceptible, or too ignorant to be exposed to without protection from the so-called top notch.

Having figured “ we the people” cannot be trusted to think pertaining to ourselves, the powers-that-be took it upon themselves in order to re-order our world into one by which they do the thinking for all of us, and all we have to do can be fall is line.

Those who do not along with line with this government-sanctioned team think— who resist, who else dare to think for them selves, who dare to adopt sights that are different, or possibly wrong or hateful— are branded as extremists, belligerents, and deplorables, and shunned, censored and silenced.

The fallout is as one would expect.

Cancel culture— political correctness amped up on steroids, the self-righteousness of a narcissistic age, along with a mass-marketed pseudo-morality that is little more than fascism disguised because tolerance— has shifted us into an Age of Intolerance, policed by techno-censors, social media bullies, and government watchdogs.

Everything is currently fair game for censorship if it can be construed since hateful, hurtful, bigoted or even offensive provided that it operates counter to the established point of view.

In this way, one of the most controversial issues of our day— race, religion, sex, libido, politics, science, health, authorities corruption, police brutality, etc . — have become battlegrounds for individuals who claim to believe in freedom (of religion, speech, assembly, press, redress, privacy, bodily honesty, etc . ) but only if it favors the sights and positions they assistance.

The latest target of this rigid re-ordering from the world into one in which vestiges of past mistakes are scrubbed from existence comes from the New York Department of Education, which has  ordered schools to stop using Native American references in mascots, team names and logos   by the end of the current school calendar year or face penalties including a loss of state aid.

Citing concerns about racism and a  need to comply with the particular state’s Dignity for All College students Act , which requires schools to create environments free from harassment or discrimination, Nyc officials are telling communities— many of which are named right after Native American tribes— that longstanding cultural associations with their towns’ Indian namesakes are  offensive   and shameful.

More than 100 schools in 60 school districts across New York State have nicknames or mascots that research Native Americans. The cost to divest their communities of this kind of branded names and pictures will be significant. One school district estimates that the cost to remove its Indians imagery from the gym floor on your own will be  up to $60, 000 .

This drive to sanitize New York schools of “ offensive” Native American logos and imagery comes on the heels of iconoclastic campaigns to rid the country of anything and anyone who may offend modern-day sensibilities.

Monuments have got been  torn down , schools and roads have been  renamed , and the names of benefactors  stripped   from prominent signage in the quest for a more enlightened age.

They are not new tactics.

Since the days of the Byzantine Empire, when “ Emperor Leo III  ordered the destruction of Christian images   on the grounds that they symbolized idolatry and were heretical, ” political movements have got resorted to destroying typical monuments, statues and imagery of the day as a visual means of making their power and vanquishing their enemies.

We have been caught in this intolerant, self-righteous, destructive,   mob-driven cycle of book-burning, statue-toppling, history-erasing iconoclasm   ever since.

As art critic Alexander Adams  explains :

“ Iconoclasm is an activity equally distributed between both right and left of the political spectrum, generally at the extreme ends… The particular intolerant ideology, which will not accept the co-existence associated with alternative views, takes the particular stance that… the values within the art are no longer utterable or supportable: they are actually injurious and dangerous to the vulnerable… The political activist reserves to himself the proper to retrospectively edit the history for his fulfillment by removing monuments, those people fixtures of civic lifetime, embedded in the memories associated with generations… Iconoclasm is an appearance of domination and a demonstration of willingness to act— illegally and unethically— to impose the will of one group over an entire inhabitants. It asserts control over most aspects of society… The campaigner argues that public art, accumulated piecemeal over 1, 000 years of history, should reflect our society plus values today— even if that means altering or erasing stories of the values our past society expressed via its monuments, or suppressing evidence of how we arrived at our current situation… The iconoclast believes that it is only the values of today that count— that it is only  her   values that count. She takes it upon their self to  correct   history through gigantic acts of egotism. That  correction , in order to involves destruction, permanently changes the cultural legacy. It shrinks the breadth associated with human experience available to the generations which follow ours. ”

In such a world, there can be simply no debate, no journey in order to understanding, no chance to study from one’s mistakes or even make some mistakes that are uniquely your own; there is certainly only obedience and compliance to the government, its corporate overlords and the prevailing mob mindset.

Censorship, cancel culture, political correctness, woke-ism, hate speech, intolerance: whatever label you give to this overzealous drive in order to sanitize the culture associated with anything that might be deemed unpleasant or disturbing or challenging, be assured they are sign blogposts on a one-way road in order to graver dangers marked simply by “ suppression, persecution, expulsion and the massacring of individuals . ”

Whether those smashing ancient monuments and erasing history performing so for noble reasons or more diabolical reasons,   the end results are the same : criminalization, confiscation, imprisonment, exile and genocide.

“ Look at mobs which gather to smash ancient monuments, ” says Adams. “ These monuments may be the figurines of deposed dictators whom terrorized populations, causing lots of death and suffering. They might be monuments to fallen soldiers who died defending causes that are no longer fashionable. The particular mob’s anger is the exact same. The viciousness and triumphal celebrations are the same. Only the leads to differ in seriousness, topicality and justification. ”

Adams continues:

“ The Civil War statue destroyers think they are assaulting the posterity of slave proprietors, but  they themselves are in the grip of ideological fervor . They are unaware that they are running a biological code, hardwired in their brains by evolution and activated simply by political extremists. The active supporters and workers of today heedlessly erase history they haven’t yet discovered to read. They act as the particular hammer that extremists use to deface the cathedrals and museums our ancestors constructed. ”

What’s different about this existing age, however , is the usage of technology to censor, silence, delete, label as “ hateful, ” demonize plus destroy those whose opinions run counter to the cultural elite.

“ In the last few years, ” produces Nina Powers for  Art Review , “ what is understood to be contentious has become increasingly broadly defined…   The range of exactly what counts as acceptable will get smaller and smaller … [W]e thus find ourselves… in the middle of a new culture war in which the freedom to think, feel and communicate ourselves comes at the danger of economic impoverishment, social ostracism and mob justice. ”

Exactly where this leads is the stuff of dystopian nightmares: communities that value conformity and group-think over individuality; the populace so adept from self-censorship and compliance they are capable only of obeying the government’s dictates with no ability to parse out whether those dictates should be followed; and a language limited to government-speak.

This is what occurs the voices of the vast majority are allowed to eliminate these in the minority, and it is exactly why James Madison, the author of the Bill of Rights, fought against for a First Amendment that will protected the “ minority” against the majority, ensuring that during the face of overwhelming pressure, a minority of one— even one who espouses horrible viewpoints— would still have the right to speak freely, pray freely, assemble freely, challenge the government freely, and transmit his views in the press freely.

Independence for those in the unpopular minority constitutes the ultimate tolerance in a free society.

The alternative, as depicted in Ayn Rand’s novella  Anthem , is a world in which individuality and the ability to think for oneself in addition to the government and the populace are eradicated, where even the phrase “ I” has been eliminated from the vocabulary,   replaced by the collective “ we. ”

As  Anthem ‘s narrator Equality 7-2521 explains, “ This is a sin to think words simply no others think and to force them down upon a papers no others are to see…. And well we know that there is no criminal offense blacker than to do or even think alone. ”

As I make clear in  Battlefield America: The War on the American People   and in its fictional counterpart  The Erik Blair Diaries , we are not merely losing the  ability   to think critically for ourselves and, in turn, to govern our inner and external worlds, we are also at risk to losing the  right   to do so.

The government’s war on thought crimes and truth-tellers is just the beginning.

Pfizer CEO Reports Alex Jones Enemy #1 – Learn Why

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *