Anti-Lockdown Stanford Professor: “Academic Freedom Is Dead”
“They systematically attempted to make it seem like everyone agreed with their ideas about COVID policy, when in fact there is deep disagreement among scientists”
The Stanford Professor who challenged the orthodoxy of lockdowns has warned that “ academic freedom is deceased, ” and that all those who have stood up to the routine narrative now face “ a deeply hostile work place. ”
Dr . Jay Bhattacharya, a writer of the Great Barrington Declaration in which thousands of scientists required a policy of herd immunity over lockdowns, warned that “ When you take a place that is at odds with all the scientific clerisy, your life becomes a living hell. ”
Speaking in the Academic Freedom Conference at Stanford’s Graduate School of Business recently, Bhattacharya, which previously described lockdowns as the most catastrophically harmful policy in “ all of history, ” and “ the single most severe public health mistake within the last 100 years, ” noted “ we have a high clerisy that declares from on high what is real and what is not true. ”
Watch:
In a further interview with Fox News , Bhattacharya noted “ The basic premise is that if you don’t have protection and academic independence in the hard cases, any time a faculty member has an concept that’s unpopular among a few of the other faculty – powerful faculty, or even the administration … If they don’t protect it in that case, then you don’t have academic freedom at all. ”
Bhattacharya and thousands of other academics and scientists were initially vilified designed for damning lockdowns, but have since been vindicated as the societal and medical toll of the shutdowns has been exposed.
Bhattacharya mentioned of the declaration, “ The purpose of the one-page document had been aimed at telling the public that there was not a scientific consensus in favor of lockdown, that in fact many epidemiologists, many doctors, many other people – notable people – disagreed using the consensus. ”
The professor then referred to how proponents of the declaration were systematically frozen from discussions and debates.
“ If Stanford really truly were devoted to academic freedom, they would have… worked to make sure that there were arguments and discussions, seminars, exactly where these ideas were talked about among faculty, ” he urged, adding that “ power replaced the idea of truth as the guiding lighting. ”
“ So you have somebody like Tony Fauci who says unironically, that if you query me, you’re not simply questioning a man, that you simply questioning science itself, ” Bhattacharya further mentioned, adding “ That is a workout of raw power, where he places himself effectively as the pope of science rather than a genuine desire to learn the reality. ”
“ They systematically tried to make it seem like everyone agreed using their ideas about COVID policy, when in fact there was serious disagreement among scientists plus epidemiologists about the right strategy, ” the professor asserted.
Bhattacharya has additionally called on new Twitter owner Elon Musk to “ expose the government censorship regime, ”:
Bhattacharya’s comments come like a new analysis of federal government and state data uncovered that for the first time a majority of Americans dying from COVID were at least partially vaccinated.
“ Fifty-eight percent of coronavirus deaths within August were people who were vaccinated or boosted, ” the Washington Post reports in a piece headlined ‘ Covid is no longer mainly a pandemic of the unvaccinated’.
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
ALERT! In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that individuals stay in touch.
We need you to subscribe to our free newsletter here .
Support our own sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged enhance of clean energy without the comedown.
Also, we urgently require your financial support here . — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
