Undercover footage from the Entire world Health Summit 2022 within Berlin, Germany shows a participant admitting that global lockdowns recommended by the top notch were rooted in politics, not science.
The World Health Summit, in partnership with the World Health Organization, held a three-day conference in October featuring 300 speakers and 3000 participants to discuss the global response to COVID-19 and future pandemic reactions.
A member the German-West Africa Center with regard to Pandemic Prevention ( G-WAC ), financed by Germany’s Federal Foreign Office, explained to an undercover Rebel Information reporter that many of the policy decisions suggested by the World Health Corporation (WHO) during the COVID pandemic were not scientifically sound.
“ In the heat of the pandemic, most of the decisions were not based on science like I said. They were just reactionary. Anything that would help, ” the G-WAC member mentioned.
“ Today, with the benefit of hindsight, we can tell that some of those decisions is not backed by technology. ”
“ The vaccines do not prevent the spread of the condition. But now we know, ” he or she added.
The particular G-WAC member went on in order to claim that ordering people to adhere to arbitrary lockdown orders was obviously a good decision, but most likely wouldn’t happen again in light of new evidence that the lockdowns did virtually nothing in order to slow the spread of COVID-19.
“ At first, nobody knew so it was political, yes, yet we think it helped in flattening the curve too, ” he said. “ So a decision had to be made. Although we didn’t know the scientific basis of those choices, people had to comply and think it worked. ”
“ A lot of things that happened during COVID wouldn’t have happened, from what we know now. People are much more prepared than they were before, ” he added.
He furthermore admitted that “ a few scientific processes may have been sidestepped or overlooked” by the pharmaceutic companies “ so we might have vaccines. ”
Despite the many speakers plus topics, the negative outcomes or ethical implications associated with imposing global lockdowns are not discussed at the summit.
These remarks, even though maddening, are not surprising provided the WHO and Globe Economic Forum’s stated objectives for the world coming out of the COVID pandemic are not based on science, but control: vaccine passports , and main bank digital currencies as part of a interpersonal credit score system.