90-year-old biologist and Ecoscience author Paul Ehrlich fearmongered about global warming during a latest appearance on CBS ‘ h “ 60 Minutes. ”
Ehrlich, a known eugenicist who seem to incorrectly expected millions of deaths from famine by the 1980s, warned “ humanity is not sustainable” and that “ The following few decades will be the finish of the kind of civilization jooxie is used to. ”
CBS News anchor Scott Pelley added, “ The five mass extinctions of the historic past were caused by natural calamities. Volcanos and a good asteroid. Today, if the technology is right, humanity may have to endure a 6th mass extinction in a world of its very own making. ”
Despite the biologist’s poor record of predicting grim outcomes for the future of mankind dating back to over fifty years, mainstream networks such as CBS News continue citing him as an expert.
On Monday, Twitter CEO Elon Musk stated Ehrlich’s 1968 book The Population Bomb “ might [be] the most harming anti-human thing ever written. ”
Musk also stated, “ Absolutely nothing he says should be given the slightest credibility, ” mainly because “ Ehrlich despises mankind. ”
Journalist Tom Elliot pointed out on Tweets that Ehrlich incorrectly recommended in 1971 the UK will be a “ small group of impoverished islands inhabited by seventy million hungry people” from the year 2000.
As usual, Alex Jones and Infowars have been ahead of the curve when it comes to revealing the pro-death globalists that help groups like the UN and WEF craft their Great Reset agenda.
Watch the following yr clip from “ The particular Alex Jones Show” discussing the forced vaccination and depopulation scheme dreamt up by Paul Ehrlich and President Obama’s science czar John Holdren.
For a look into the horrifying future envisioned by Ehrlich and Holdren, look at the following excerpt from their book “ Ecoscience. ”
“ Incorporating a sterilant to moving water or staple foods is really a suggestion that seems to horrify people more than most proposals for involuntary fertility manage. Indeed, this would pose some very difficult political, legal, plus social questions, to say absolutely nothing of the technical problems. Simply no such sterilant exists nowadays, nor does one look like under development. To become acceptable, such a substance would need to meet some rather rigid requirements: it must be uniformly effective, despite widely varying doses received by individuals, and despite different degrees of fertility and awareness among individuals; it must be free of dangerous or even unpleasant side effects; and it should have no effect on members from the opposite sex, children, old people, pets, or even livestock. ”
Or, how about this doozy?
“ … Perhaps those agencies, combined with UNEP and the United Nations population agencies , might eventually be developed into a Planetary Regime— sort of an international superagency for people, resources, and environment. This kind of comprehensive Planetary Regime could control the development, management, conservation, and distribution of all natural resources, renewable or even nonrenewable, at least insofar because international implications exist. ”
In a 1995 article , Ehrlich wrote “ a little net increase in deaths” will be “ a reasonable price in order to pay” in order to allegedly conserve the planet from Global Heating.
“ Physicians by instinct and training focus on the health of individuals; they must learn to pay more attention to the health of whole societies and also to deal with the difficult issues of interest that often arise between two. One physician, Jeffrey Fisher (1994), recommends that will physicians be required to take regular recertification exams in which these are tested on antibiotic knowledge. If antibiotics had been utilized more judiciously over the past few decades, there doubtless would have been more deaths from bacterial infections misdiagnosed as virus-like, and fewer deaths from allergic reactions to antibiotics. But a small net increase in deaths would probably have been a reasonable price to pay to avoid the current situation, which portends a positive return to the pre-antibiotic era and far higher death rates. ”
This year, Ehrlich told The Protector the particular elite should reduce the global population to at least two billion… there are currently an estimated 8 billion humans residing on the planet.
This implies he supports wiping out there around 75% of humanity.
“ We came up with 1 . five to 2 billion because you can have big active towns and wilderness. If you want a battery pack chicken world where everyone has minimum space and food and everyone is kept just about still living you might be able to support in the long run about 4 or 5 billion people. But you already have 7 billion dollars. So we have to humanely and as rapidly as possible move to populace shrinkage. ”
One of the key methods the eugenicist hopes to avoid the population from increasing is usually by producing abortions more accessible and common.
“ The easiest way, in our view, to achieve (… ) population shrinkage is to give full rights and opportunities to women, and to make modern contraception and back-up abortion accessible to all physically active people. While the degree to which these steps would decrease total fertility rates is really a matter of controversy, they might deliver significant social and economic benefits by making large reservoirs of fresh mental ability available to solve our difficulties, while saving hundreds of thousands of lives by reducing the number of unsafe abortions. ”
This evil sentiment is not uncommon among the global elite as Alex Jones has been warning for decades, only now Jones alerts the New World Order offers officially gone live with its depopulation agenda.