January 29, 2023

Ex-Intel Official Who Signed Hunter Laptop ‘Disinfo’ Letter Makes Shocking Admission

He or she knew a “significant portion” of Hunter Biden’s laptop computer “had to be real. “

An ex deputy director for the Protection Intelligence Agency (DIA) admitted that  he knew the “ significant portion” associated with Hunter Biden’s laptop  “ had to be real, ”   but signed an October 2020 letter attacking the  NY Post ‘ s bombshell report anyway, the  Post   reports.

The official, Douglas Wise, was one of 51 former cleverness officials who said the  Post ‘ s report had the look of a Russian disinformation strategy.

All of us figured that a significant portion of that content needed to be real to make any Russian disinformation credibl electronic, ” in a comment to  The Australian . “ The particular letter said it got the earmarks of Russian deceit and we should consider that as a possibility, ” he continued.

“ It did not say Hunter Biden was a good guy, it didn’t say what he did was correct and it wasn’t exculpatory, it had been just a cautionary letter. ”

Except, the letter concluded that “ It really is high time that Russia prevents interfering in our democracy, ” and referenced “[o]ur view that the Russians are involved in the Hunter Biden email issue. ”

The Oct. 19 letter — whose signatories included former Defense Secretary  Leon Panetta, former Director of National intelligence  James Clapper, and former CIA Director Bob Brennan —   went out of its way to toss doubt on the legitimacy from the Post’s scoop , dedicating five paragraphs to explaining “ factors that make all of us suspicious of Russian involvement” while slipping in the stipulation that “ we do not know if the emails … are usually genuine or not and … we do not have evidence of Ruskies involvement. ” -NY Article

And as  Jonathan Turley   notes,

The infamous letter from the former intel officials (including such Democratic statistics like John Brennan, Wayne Clapper, Leon Panetta and  Jeremy Bash ) was used by the particular media to assure the public that there was nothing to see within the scandal.   It was the perfect deflection in offering a cooperative media cover to bury the story of how the Biden family involved in influence peddling worth millions with foreign figures, which includes some with foreign intelligence connections.

It worked beautifully.   It was not until two years later that NPR, the brand new York Times, and other press outlets got around to telling the public the truth.

Now some of the signatories are trying to rehabilitate them selves. It is not hard. Figures like  Bash have been rewarded for their loyalty . Other people like Brennan and Clapper have become regulars on CNN to continue to give their assumes intelligence.

Wise, however , has tried to find some redeemable part in the letter.   He told The Australian that “ Most of us figured that a significant part of that content had to be real to make any Russian disinformation credible . ” So the emails and photos showing criminal acts with prostitutes and thousands of emails on influence peddling was most likely true, but that reality only made them a lot more dangerous forms of Russian disinformation.

It is that simple. True or not, the story was dangerous in detailing the corruption of the Biden household before the election. Done plus done.

It also means that,   under this dubious logic, you are able to spike any true story that is embarrassing to the Leader or the party as presumptive disinformation.

Indeed, Wise says that it was  “ not surprising ” to learn which the emails that he helped spike were actually genuine.

He is not alone. Wa Post columnist Thomas Rid  wrote   that    “ We must treat the Seeker Biden leaks as if they were a foreign intelligence procedure — even if they probably aren’t. ”

Let that sink in for a second . It does not matter if these are true emails and not Russian disinformation. They probably are true but should be treated because disinformation even though  American intelligence has frequently r ebutted that claim.   It does not also matter that the computer was seized as evidence in a criminal fraud investigation or that a Biden confidant is now giving his allegations to the FBI under threat associated with criminal charges if he or she lies to investigators.

Yet, they still wanted the media to deal with the story before the election as part of “ Russian overt and covert activities that weaken US national security” being a story with “ all of the classic earmarks of a Ruskies information operation. ”

Keep in mind that these “ experts” literally had nothing beyond a potentially harmful story against the Bidens prior to an election. That was everything it took for these specialists to rush out their particular letter.

Wise does not address that American intelligence reached the precise opposite conclusion and discovered no evidence — none — of Russian involvement or some foreign disinformation conspiracy.

Wise and the other signatories did not want to wait for any kind of facts to support their declare. They rushed out the letter to an eagerly waiting for media to spike the storyplot before the election. Now, they may be seeking plausible deniability which they were political operatives delivered on a political hit job. It is as implausible as calling a presumed real story “ disinformation. ”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *