The particular Supreme Court says a team has been unable to find the person responsible for the outflow of a draft majority viewpoint overturning Roe v. Sort:
They have carried out 126 formal interviews of 97 employees, all of who denied disclosing the opinion.
Despite these efforts, investigators have been unable to determine at this time, using a preponderance of the evidence standard, the identity of the person(s) whom disclosed the draft majority opinion in Dobbs sixth is v. Jackson Women’s Health Org. or how the draft viewpoint was provided to Politico.
Investigators continue to evaluation and process some digital data that has been collected and some other inquiries remain pending.
To the extent that extra investigation yields new evidence or leads, the investigators will pursue them.
This finding is somewhat odd considering not more than a week ago, The Wall Street Journal reported that Supreme Courtroom investigators probing the Might leak of Justice Samuel Alito’s draft opinion overruling Roe v. Wade have narrowed their inquiry to a small number of suspects which includes law clerks , yet officials have yet to conclusively identify the supposed culprit, people familiar with the matter said.
Congressional Republicans have complained concerning the lack of information regarding the source of the leak.
“ For some reason this individual has definitely been sheltered and there is absolutely evidence that there are particular people who know who this person is, ” Rep. Scott Fitzgerald (R., Wis. ) said at a House Judiciary Committee hearing in December, when Democrats controlled the chamber at this point under Republican leadership.
Exact same hearing, Rep. Jim Jordan (R., Ohio), now the House Judiciary Committee chairman, stated the committee should by itself investigate the leak.
As a reminder, the leak came amid rumors that Chief Justice Roberts was seeking to persuade some members of the court’s conservative majority to join your pet in a half-step that would partly curb entry to abortion, rather than fully removing the right, which women had held since the 1973 Roe decision, to end unwanted pregnancy before fetal viability.
Could the leaker have been Roberts? That would explain precisely why they can’t disclose the ‘ leaker’, since it would eliminate any trust left within the nation’s most sacred organization.
Read the full statement below: