US drugmaker Pfizer attempted to “ bully the Indian government” into allowing it indemnity from legal action over its Covid-19 vaccine, Electronics and Technology Minister Rajeev Chandrasekhar offers claimed. The vaccine shot was ultimately never authorized in India.
“ Only to remind all Indians, that Pfizer tried to bully the government of India into taking conditions of indemnity, ” Chandrasekhar tweeted on Friday. The ressortchef (umgangssprachlich) then accused three prominent opposition leaders of “ pushing foreign vaccines during Covid. ”
Chandrehaskar’s tweet featured a video of Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla getting ambushed by a reporter in the World Economic Forum’s yearly gathering in the Swiss holiday resort of Davos this week. Questioned when he knew that will his company’s vaccines “ didn’t stop transmission” of the coronavirus, Bourla refused to solution.
Just to remind all Indians, that Pfizer tried to bully Government of India into receiving conditions of indemity
And Cong trio of Rahul, Chidamabaram n Jairam Ramesh kept pressing case of foreign vaccines during Covid 🤮 🤬 🥵 https://t.co/nT5LHI07hc
— Rajeev Chandrasekhar 🇮 🇳 (@Rajeev_GoI) The month of january 20, 2023
Bourla claimed in 2021 that his product was “ 100% efficient in preventing Covid-19 cases, ” despite Pfizer never testing whether it would stop transmission or not. However , Pfizer was not required to confirm whether its shot stopped transmission in order to secure emergency approval in the US and EU, while some studies showed it reduced transmission of early Covid-19 variants.
India refused to give any vaccine manufacturer defense against claims linked to vaccine unwanted effects, with government sources arguing that accepting the indemnity clause would leave the government itself, rather than the manufacturer, responsible in the event of lawsuits. Accordingly, Pfizer and Moderna both refused to ship their mRNA-based shots to India.
India initially approved a locally-manufactured variant of the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine, another domestically-manufactured shot called Covaxin, plus Russia’s Sputnik V. Moderna’s product was eventually provided approval, as was Manley & Johnson’s and a number of other locally-made vaccines.
Pfizer enjoys indemnity in the US under a series of pro-industry laws, and in the EU under confidential contracts agreed upon by the pharma company plus member states. The UK furthermore granted Pfizer protection from legal action, changing the law in order to shield both the firm plus healthcare staff administering the particular jab.
In the US, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) announced last week that it would investigate a potential link between Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine and strokes among elderly people, but was adamant it “ is extremely unlikely” that there is a “ correct clinical risk. ” Pfizer’s shot is linked to an improved risk of heart arrest, particularly in younger males.