Shouldn’t the alarm bells be ringing? Why haven’t the authorities long since swung into action to assure the public that a full independent public investigation is properly underway?
To a critical ear, the particular silence is as deafening as it is worrying. After 11 several weeks of official reports of a sustained fall in the birth rate, the Swedish mainstream media have reacted . However , news reviews omit any reference to a possible involvement of the elephant within the room: mRNA vaccines. Therefore , what is the evidence that we really should have an opportunity to consider?
The number of children created in Sweden has reduced by an average of 8. 6% over the period from The month of january to November 2022. The largest percentage decreases occurred on the most recent three months of reporting (September-November 2022). Over this era, 11. 7% fewer children were born in Sweden to women aged eighteen to 45 years, in line with the figure expected from regression analysis of data from the previous 10 years.
Although data are released monthly, opinion from official sources is as absent as investigative confirming from the mainstream media. The German Government functioning paper has noted the correlation between the drop in fertility plus birth rate in both Sweden and Germany and the COVID-19 vaccine rollout. However , the particular paper blamed behaviour modify and drew no link with the exposure of women of childbearing age to story mRNA vaccines.
Data represented in the bar chart above are based on data through Statistics Sweden and using the number of births per calendar month per 100, 000 women elderly 18 to 45 yrs from October 2011 to November 2022, to estimate expected and observed figures. Births per month were separated by the number of women in the population on December 31st of the preceding year, portrayed as a percentage.
Swedish birth rates have got followed a declining tendency over the last century. Exceptional adverse or positive changes (plus or minus 6% within the birth rate from the previous year) have occurred, one example is following the significant peak in the 1920s and after baby booms in the 1940s, 1960s plus 1990s. Except for 1922, however , there has never been such a sharp decline in delivery rate over a single season as occurred in 2022.
In previous cycles of birth price boom and bust, the notable peak has always preceded a notable decline – until now. The drop in 2022 has been preceded by 20 years of relatively stable birth rates. No matter the explanation, there is little wish that December’s data will certainly prevent this ominous report from descending into the background books. The question that needs to be tackled, why is 2022 an outlier?
A similar pattern had not been observed after the H1N1 swine flu epidemic in 2009, exactly where about 60% of the Swedish population received the recently developed protein-based vaccine Pandemrix . The publicity of most women of having children age (18-45 years) to experimental COVID-19 mRNA vaccination started in May 2021 , when rolled to persons under 65 years without a risk factor.
On average, 4. 6% of all births in Sweden are premature (under 37 days or 8. 3 months associated with pregnancy from 2016-2021). Therefore, an effect on birth rate due to mRNA vaccines will be expected from January 2022; the observed drop coincides unerringly with a possible side effect of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines.
If a stark correlation with an atypical decline within birth rate was the just signal, it should warrant an immediate halt to mRNA vaccination. However , both Pfizer as well as the regulators, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in the EUROPEAN, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the U. H., and the Medicines and Health care products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) in the U. K., amongst other national agencies, were aware that mRNA vaccines could lead to effects on male fertility. So how did the government bodies miss this signal and even more significantly, how did the regulators authorise these products without having appropriate safety testing?
Pfizer’s application to the Japanese Patent Office in 2020 showed that intramuscular injection of modified mRNA using the same lipid nanoparticle provider formulation as their COVID-19 candidate, dispersed widely through the body and away from the site associated with injection. The mRNA gathered and was expressed in organs, including the ovaries of female rats.
This mRNA distribution plus expression profile far surpasses that expected of a typical protein-based vaccine. Despite this, the EMA classified Pfizer/BioNTech’s mRNA item BNT162B2 as a “ vaccine against an infectious agent”. Under regulatory laws enacted in 2009 , this particular enabled Pfizer/BioNTech to circumvent the more stringent regulatory framework of a Gene or Advanced Medical Therapy Product (GTMP/ATMP), which one may argue should have applied to all mRNA, DNA or even viral vector vaccines articulating an intact, membrane-anchored spike protein, for which the full repertoire of biological functions is not understood.
Moreover, the EMA never widely considered these products via its Committee on Sophisticated Therapies (CAT), which may normally deliberate over GTMP/ATMP status.
Reduced fertility due to negative effects upon sperm may also contribute to the observed drop in birth rate. A research of sperm donors in Israel demonstrated that the number and motility of sperm were considerably reduced five months right after receiving Pfizer’s mRNA vaccine. The effect of further booster doses has not been reported on either male or female fertility.
It is unknown when or how mRNA vaccination is connected to the decline within birth rates seen considering that 2021, not just in Sweden but throughout the world . It is equally unknown what the long-term safety effects of mRNA vaccines are – they are only now being examined on a population. Correlation will not prove causation. However , by no means in modern history provides such a synchronised decline within birth rate been noticed across the developed world, specifically aligned with the massive roll out of a new and experimental medical treatment.
Sven Romá n MARYLAND is a child and teenagers psychiatrist and one of the founders of Lä karuppropet (‘ Physicians’ Appeal’). Jonathan Gilthorpe PhD is a cellular and developmental biologist and it has been a member of Lä karuppropet since 2021.