Massive Peer-Reviewed Mask Study Shows ‘Little To No Difference’ In Preventing COVID, Flu Infection
A massive international research collaboration that analyzed several dozen rigorous studies focusing on “ physical interventions” against COVID-19 and influenza found which they provide little to no protection against infection or illness rates. The study, released in the peer-reviewed Cochrane Database of Systematic Evaluations, is the strongest technology to date refuting the basis for mask mandates worldwide. Nearly 60% of South Korea’s population […]#@@#@!!
A massive international research collaboration that analyzed several dozen rigorous research focusing on “ physical interventions” against COVID-19 and influenza found that they provide little to no protection against infection or illness rates.
The study , published in the peer-reviewed Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews , is the strongest science to date refuting the foundation for mask mandates globally .
And of course, the CDC still recommends masking in areas along with “ high” rates of transmission (fewer than 4% of US counties, as Just the News notes), along with indoor masking in locations with “ medium” rates of transmission (27%).
Masks are still required in educational institutions in Democratic strongholds such as New York, New Jersey, Ma, Pennsylvania, Washington and Ca , according to the Daily Mail . Birkenstock boston Public Schools denied its “ temporary masking protocol” in early January was a “ require, ” following a public letter against the policy by college student Enrique Abud Evereteze.
South Korea is still requiring masks on public transport and in medical facilities after dropping COVID mandates in most indoor settings, including gyms, Monday, Reuters reported . -Just the News
According to the Cochrane study, which included the work of researchers at institutions in the U. K., North america, Australia, Italy and Saudi Arabia, an overall total of 78 studies had been analyzed . Most recent additions to the meta-analysis were 11 new randomized controlled trials .
As unlisted study author Carl Heneghan – who seem to directs the Centre designed for Evidence-Based Medicine at the College of Oxford noted on Twitter: “ Wearing masks in the community probably makes little if any difference to the outcome of influenza‐ like illness (ILI)/COVID‐ nineteen like illness compared to not wearing masks. ”
The Danish research had trouble finding a major journal ready to publish its controversial results that wearing surgical masks had no statistically significant effect on infection rates, also among those who claimed to wear them “ exactly as advised. ”
Mainstream mass media overlooked red flags in the Bangladeshi mask study, which found no effect meant for surgical masks under age group 50 and also a difference of only 20 infections between manage and treatment groups among 342, 000 adults. -JTN
Bottom line, mask wearing “ probably makes little to no difference, ” when it comes to influenza-like or even COVID-like illnesses, regardless of type of mask used.
We’re sure the cult of Fauci will start insisting peer-reviewed meta-analyses aren’t ‘ the technology. ‘
